Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill
Summary
What this is
The Railways Bill 2024-26 is the Government's primary structural rail-reform vehicle, creating Great British Railways (GBR) as a publicly-owned 'directing mind' that brings track and train into a single entity, alongside a strengthened passenger watchdog, a new access regime on GBR's network, and statutory roles for devolved governments and mayoral authorities.
Why it matters
It is the most significant rewrite of the Railways Act 1993 architecture since privatisation: it ends the ORR's role as access decision-maker on the GBR network (replacing it with an appeals function), reshapes the periodic review funding cycle, gives the Secretary of State power to amend existing track access contracts retrospectively, and consolidates passenger-protection functions currently split across ORR, Transport Focus and the Rail Ombudsman.
Current status
Introduced as Bill 325 on 5 November 2025, the Bill completed Commons Public Bill Committee on 10 February 2026 (reprinted as Bill 373 as amended in Committee) and remains at Report stage with daily amendment papers running through April-May 2026; the Scottish Parliament agreed an LCM on 24 March 2026 and DfTO began absorbing operator staff from 1 April 2026.
What changed recently
- 24 Apr 2026 — Government published its formal response to the Transport Committee's 8th Report on the Railways Bill (4th Special Report). →
- 1 Apr 2026 — First TOC staff transfers into DfT Operator Ltd ahead of GBR designation, prompting written questions from MPs about sequencing relative to Bill passage. →
- 25 Mar 2026 — DfT published the framework Memorandum of Understanding with Scottish Ministers and the full MoU with Welsh Ministers on applying the Bill in the devolved nations. →
- 24 Mar 2026 — Scottish Parliament agreed a Legislative Consent Motion for the Railways Bill. →
- 17 Mar 2026 — DfT announced Delay Repay reform and published the Government response to the ORR's independent review of train-operator revenue-protection practices. →
Key documents
Framework
-
Railways Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee)
The current operative text following Public Bill Committee; 99 clauses and 4 Schedules including a new Schedule 3 on transfer schemes and the renumbered access-regime provisions.
-
Railways Bill 325 2024-26 (as introduced)
The introduction print of 5 November 2025 — 93 clauses and 3 Schedules establishing GBR, the funding regime, designation of services, the Passengers' Council and the new access framework.
-
A railway fit for Britain's future — government response
Government's November 2025 response to the rail reform consultation, setting the policy frame the Bill operationalises (passenger watchdog, integrated track and train, devolved roles).
Operationalising
-
Explanatory Notes (Bill 325 EN)
DfT's clause-by-clause explanatory notes; sets out the policy intent for GBR as a 'directing mind', the periodic-review-replacement business-plan funding cycle, and the access-regime appeals architecture.
-
ECHR Memorandum
Department's Convention-compatibility analysis flagging Article 6(1) (ORR's dual statutory roles in access appeals) and A1P1 (retrospective amendment of existing track access contracts under clause 71).
-
Delegated Powers Memorandum
Memorandum to the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee setting out and justifying the Bill's delegated powers, including the designation power in clause 1 and the access-contract amendment power in clause 71.
-
DfT Impact Assessment
Final-stage IA setting out the rationale: information/coordination failure, principal-agent issues, externalities and productive inefficiency in the post-privatisation structure; subsequently rated Green by the RPC.
-
Railways Bill equalities impact assessment
DfT's analysis of how Bill measures affect protected characteristics — informs the disabled-passenger duties in clause 18 and the accessibility roadmap commitments.
-
Railways Bill landing page (gov.uk)
DfT's published collection of factsheets, IAs and supporting documents to accompany the Bill's introduction.
Implementation
-
Framework MoU with Scottish Ministers
DfT/Scottish Government framework for how the Bill's track-and-train integration will apply in Scotland, including the GBR subsidiary/joint-company option.
-
MoU with Welsh Ministers
DfT/Welsh Government MoU on applying the Bill in Wales and the Borders, partnering Transport for Wales with GBR and addressing Core Valley Lines.
-
Scottish Parliament Legislative Consent Motion
LCM agreed by the Scottish Parliament on 24 March 2026 — necessary devolution underpinning for clauses bearing on Scottish railway activities.
-
Railway Byelaws Amendment Order 2025 (SI 2025/1258)
Discrete secondary legislation modernising railway byelaws under the existing Transport Act 2000 framework, alongside Bill passage.
-
Accessible railways roadmap
DfT roadmap of actions to make railways more accessible in the run-up to GBR establishment — operationalises the disability-related duties in clauses 18 and 33-34.
Scrutiny
-
Transport Committee 8th Report — Railways Bill
The select committee's pre-legislative-style scrutiny report on the Bill, addressing freight, accessibility, devolution interface and the design of the access regime.
-
Transport Committee 4th Special Report — Government Response
Government's formal response (April 2026) to the Transport Committee's 8th Report.
-
Commons Library Briefing CBP-10386 — Railways Bill 2024-26
Independent Commons Library overview of the Bill's contents, policy background and parliamentary progress.
-
RPC opinion: Railways Bill impact assessment (Green-rated)
Regulatory Policy Committee opinion confirming the DfT's IA is fit for purpose.
-
RPC opinion on Bill IA (Green-rated)
Confirmatory RPC opinion published alongside introduction.
-
Second Reading debate (9 December 2025)
Commons Second Reading — the principal stage at which Members tested the policy frame before Committee.
Evidence
-
A railway fit for Britain's future — executive summary
Government response executive summary distilling consultation themes into Bill design choices.
-
A railway fit for Britain's future (consultation)
Original DfT consultation seeking views on proposals to reform Great Britain's railways, prior to the Bill.
-
Draft Rail Reform Bill (February 2024)
The previous administration's draft Rail Reform Bill — predecessor text scrutinised by the Transport Committee in 2024 that informed the structure of the present Bill.
-
Ministers set out blueprint for future of the railways through draft Rail Reform Bill (Feb 2024)
Conservative-era launch of the draft Rail Reform Bill, identifying continuity in the track-and-train integration policy direction.
Consultations
-
A railway fit for Britain's future
The originating consultation whose response shaped the Bill as introduced.
-
A railway fit for Britain's future: government response
Sets out which consultation positions were carried into the Bill text.
-
A railway fit for Britain's future: government response – executive summary
Companion to the full response.
-
Independent review of train operator revenue protection practices: government response
Adjacent operational consultation closing alongside Bill passage — relevant to the Passengers' Council standards framework.
Stakeholders
Sponsoring department 1
-
Department for Transport
→ src
Sponsoring minister 4
Lead committee 3
Witnesses & evidence-givers 12
-
Office of Rail and Road
→ src
-
Transport Focus
→ src
-
RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers)
→ src
-
ASLEF (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen)
→ src
-
Rail Freight Group
→ src
-
Railway Industry Association
→ src
-
ALLRAIL (Alliance of Passenger Rail New Entrants)
→ src
-
Lumo and Hull Trains
→ src
-
Trainline
→ src
-
Independent Rail Retailers
→ src
-
Andy Burnham (Mayor of Greater Manchester)
→ src
-
Urban Transport Group
→ src
Political commitments
-
commitment Manifesto pledge
Reform the railways and bring them into public ownership
Why linked: The 2024 Labour manifesto commitment is the foundational political driver; the IA explicitly states the Bill 'delivers on the government's commitment to create a unified and simplified rail sector'.
-
commitment Manifesto pledge
Establish a new passenger watchdog
Why linked: The Bill's Part 2 Chapter 2 (the Passengers' Council) implements this manifesto commitment by consolidating consumer functions from ORR, Transport Focus and the Rail Ombudsman.
-
commitment King's Speech announcement
Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill
Why linked: The King's Speech 2026 dedicated section on the Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill positions structural reform plus passenger-rights reform as a single legislative package.
-
commitment Ministerial statement
Bringing track and train together under a new Great British Railways
Draft bill sets out blueprint for bringing track and train together under a new Great British Railways, leveraging private sector innovation
Why linked: Predecessor commitment carried forward — the previous administration's February 2024 Draft Rail Reform Bill identified track-and-train integration as the structural target.
Open questions & gaps
Pending in the lifecycle
- Commons Report and Third Reading following the run of daily amendment papers through April-May 2026.
- Lords stages, including likely scrutiny of clause 71 (retrospective amendment of access contracts) on A1P1 grounds.
- Welsh Senedd LCM (Scottish LCM already secured; Welsh equivalent not yet recorded in events).
- Royal Assent expected within the 2024-26 session; commencement regulations for designation of the GBR body corporate under clause 1.
Beyond the corpus
- MISSING Government Response to Transport Committee on freight target and access-regime competition concerns — published 24 April 2026 but text not in body corpus —
- MISSING Welsh Senedd Legislative Consent Motion text —
- MISSING Draft regulations under clause 1 designating GBR —
- MISSING Draft Long-Term Rail Strategy under clause 15 —
Confidence gaps
- Whether the daily amendment papers from late February to late April 2026 represent Report-stage marshalling or further Committee revisits is not unambiguously visible from titles alone.
- The interplay between DfTO's operational consolidation from 1 April 2026 and the statutory designation of GBR under clause 1 — i.e. how long DfTO remains the operating vehicle before GBR is designated.
Full timeline
3862026
Letter from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Lord Strathclyde, Chair of the Constitution Committee, responding to the Committee's letter on the Railways Bill
Letter from Lord Strathclyde, Chair of the Constitution Committee to Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill regarding the Railways Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has considered alternatives to the staff travel pass for Brighton and Hove Buses and Metrobus staff for use on the GTR network.
Why linked: Question about staff travel pass alternatives for bus and rail operators (GTR network); relates to passenger-focused rail service operations during GBR implementation
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has considered alternatives to the staff travel pass for Brighton and Hove Buses and Metrobus staff for use on the GTR network.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, on what grounds was the decision taken to terminate staff rail pass, the reciprocal travel arrangement between Govia Thameslink Railway and the local bus…
Why linked: Question about staff rail pass termination affecting Govia Thameslink Railway operations; relevant to passenger rail franchise and operational reform under GBR transition
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, on what grounds was the decision taken to terminate staff rail pass, the reciprocal travel arrangement between Govia Thameslink Railway and the local bus operators Brighton & Hove Buses and Metrobus, when …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department is taking under GBR to increase cross border rail connections, such as the Wrexham-Shropshire-Midlands Railway.
Why linked: Direct question about GBR (Great British Railways) implementation regarding cross-border rail connections, explicitly within the interpreted scope of the Bill's structural and regulatory reform
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department is taking under GBR to increase cross border rail connections, such as the Wrexham-Shropshire-Midlands Railway.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how competition regulations on state aid are applied by the Office of Rail and Road when assessing applications for Open Access rail services; and what changes are expected following the ORR's move into her Dep
Why linked: PQ on how competition regulations and state aid are applied by ORR under GBR — directly on regulator-Bill interface
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how competition regulations on state aid are applied by the Office of Rail and Road when assessing applications for Open Access rail services; and what changes are expected following the ORR's move …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what expenditure has Network Rail undertaken on public affairs companies, and for what purposes, since 4 July 2024.
Why linked: Written question on Network Rail public affairs spending (April 2026) - scrutiny of key public body (Network Rail) involved in Great British Railways transition
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what expenditure has Network Rail undertaken on public affairs companies, and for what purposes, since 4 July 2024.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the future role of the Railway Benefit Fund under Great British Railways.
Why linked: Written question on future role of Railway Benefit Fund under Great British Railways, directly relevant to GBR governance and transition
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the future role of the Railway Benefit Fund under Great British Railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the opportunities presented by Great British Railways to improve access to rail-side infrastructure for mobile connectivity, including by addressing historic barriers related to
Why linked: Written question on GBR opportunities to improve access to rail-side infrastructure, relevant to passenger accessibility and service standards
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the opportunities presented by Great British Railways to improve access to rail-side infrastructure for mobile connectivity, including by addressing historic barriers related to
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the current shortage of train drivers, broken down by Department for Transport Operator area, in terms of a) total number of drivers required, and b) percentage shortfal
Why linked: PQ on train driver shortage by region — directly on operational backdrop to the Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the current shortage of train drivers, broken down by Department for Transport Operator area, in terms of a) total number of drivers required, and b) …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason she plans to transfer staff to Department of Transport Operator Ltd prior to the completion of the Railways Bill.
Why linked: PQ on staff transfer to Department for Transport Operator Ltd prior to completion of the Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason she plans to transfer staff to Department of Transport Operator Ltd prior to the completion of the Railways Bill.
Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the Shadow Great British Railways, dated 23 March 2026
Why linked: Letter from Secretary of State on the Shadow Great British Railways (March 2026) — directly on transition arrangements
Direction: to_committee
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to protect transport workers a) jobs b) pay c) pensions d) conditions and e) travel facilities in the context of the transition to Great British Railways.
Why linked: PQ on transport workers' jobs, pay, pensions and conditions during transition — directly on Bill staff-transfer issues
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to protect transport workers a) jobs b) pay c) pensions d) conditions and e) travel facilities in the context of the transition to Great British Railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the levels of challenges for transport workers in the transition to Great British Railways.
Why linked: PQ on challenges for transport workers in the GBR transition — directly on Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the levels of challenges for transport workers in the transition to Great British Railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the establishment of Great British Railways on the statutory duty to consult with the public on any significant change to Schedule 17 of the Ticketing and
Why linked: PQ on impact of GBR establishment on transport workers — directly on Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the establishment of Great British Railways on the statutory duty to consult with the public on any significant change to Schedule 17 …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with (a) Ministers and (b) officials on the (i) the transfer of workers from private Train Operating Companies into the Department for Transport Operator and (ii) the transfer of wo
Why linked: PQ on transfer of workers from TOCs into Department for Transport Operator Ltd.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with (a) Ministers and (b) officials on the (i) the transfer of workers from private Train Operating Companies into the Department for Transport Operator and (ii) the …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of including provisions for the protection of transport workers’ pensions during the transition to Great British Railways in the Railways Bill.
Why linked: PQ on transport workers' pensions during transition under the Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of including provisions for the protection of transport workers’ pensions during the transition to Great British Railways in the Railways Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to protect transport workers a) jobs b) pay c) pensions d) conditions and e) travel facilities in the transition to Great British Railways.
Why linked: PQ on protection of transport workers' pay, pensions, conditions during transition — directly on Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to protect transport workers a) jobs b) pay c) pensions d) conditions and e) travel facilities in the transition to Great British Railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to help ensure that all future Great British Railways workers are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Why linked: PQ on ensuring all future GBR workers are covered by sectoral arrangements — directly on Bill
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking to help ensure that all future Great British Railways workers are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 11 March 2026 to Question 117438 on Great British Railways: Finance, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of publishing details of the modelling, business case develo
Why linked: Written question directly on Great British Railways finance and policy
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 11 March 2026 to Question 117438 on Great British Railways: Finance, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of publishing details of the modelling, …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with trade unions regarding on the establishment of collective bargaining arrangements under Great British Railways.
Why linked: Written question on collective bargaining under GBR - structural reform of rail operations
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with trade unions regarding on the establishment of collective bargaining arrangements under Great British Railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 2 March 2026 to Question 115554 on Great British Railways: Finance, whether she plans to publish the (a) internal modelling, (b) business case documentation and (c) analytical assessme
Why linked: Written question on GBR finance and implementation plans publication
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 2 March 2026 to Question 115554 on Great British Railways: Finance, whether she plans to publish the (a) internal modelling, (b) business case documentation and (c) analytical …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the proposed Great British Railways ticketing website and mobile application will be (a) built upon existing industry retail systems and (b) a newly developed retail platform owned and operated by Great
Why linked: Written question on GBR ticketing website/app - passenger-facing reform
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the proposed Great British Railways ticketing website and mobile application will be (a) built upon existing industry retail systems and (b) a newly developed retail platform owned and operated by Great
Letter from Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP, Secretary of State, Department for Transport on publication of four Common Frameworks, dated 23.2.26
Why linked: Letter from SoS for Transport on publication of four Common Frameworks, relevant to devolved aspects of the Bill.
Direction: to_committee
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what statutory role combined authorities will have under the Railways Bill in relation to service levels, timetabling and rolling stock deployment; what mechanisms will exist for regional leaders to challenge o
Why linked: PQ on combined authorities' statutory role under the Railways Bill (March 2026).
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what statutory role combined authorities will have under the Railways Bill in relation to service levels, timetabling and rolling stock deployment; what mechanisms will exist for regional leaders to challenge o
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 February 2026 to Question 108456 on Great British Railways: Finance, whether (a) internal modelling, (b) business case documentation and (c) analytical assessment underpins the comm
Why linked: Written question on GBR finance modelling and assessment
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 February 2026 to Question 108456 on Great British Railways: Finance, whether (a) internal modelling, (b) business case documentation and (c) analytical assessment underpins the comm
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the Office of Rail and Road’s decision not to extend the Rail Transparency Order to cover rail maintenance costs.
Why linked: Written question on ORR decision implications for GBR policy
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the Office of Rail and Road’s decision not to extend the Rail Transparency Order to cover rail maintenance costs.
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to lowering the minimum age to be a train driver, dated 10 February 2026
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on lowering the minimum age to be a train driver, an amendment area on the Bill.
Direction: to_committee
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the answer of 29 January 2026, to Question 107278, on Department for Transport: Official Hospitality, whether the Cabinet Office has issued any guidance on Arm's Length Bodies using public funds to h
Why linked: PQ correspondence with DfT relating to Railways Bill.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the answer of 29 January 2026, to Question 107278, on Department for Transport: Official Hospitality, whether the Cabinet Office has issued any guidance on Arm's Length Bodies using public funds …
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to transfer of train operating companies into public ownership, dated 30 January 2026
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on TOC transfer into public ownership (Feb 2026).
Direction: to_committee
The RNEP should not become an unfunded wishlist: there must be a high bar of viability for projects to be included, and a commensurately high bar for any subsequent decision to remove them from the pipeline. The inclusion and status of projects should be regularly reviewed by the Secretary of State, the Office of Rail and Road and, when established, Great British Railways and the Passenger Watchdog. (Recommendation, Paragraph 71)
Why linked: Committee finding on the Rail Network Enhancements Pipeline — relevant to GBR's infrastructure-management functions.
The RNEP should not become an unfunded wishlist: there must be a high bar of viability for projects to be included, and a commensurately high bar for any subsequent decision to remove them from the pipeline. The inclusion and status …
While the Government insists that the intended relationship between clause 60 and clause 63 is clear, multiple stakeholders disagree. The Bill should be amended to make it clear that the capacity duty does not apply until after an infrastructure capacity plan has been developed. (Recommendation, Paragraph 72)
Why linked: Direct substantive scrutiny material on the Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill itself, raising stakeholder concerns about specific clauses (60 and 63) that require amendment—core legislative scrutiny content.
While the Government insists that the intended relationship between clause 60 and clause 63 is clear, multiple stakeholders disagree. The Bill should be amended to make it clear that the capacity duty does not apply until after an infrastructure capacity …
The UK rail network is a core national asset, supporting its own industrial ecosystem and underpinning broader economic growth and employment. The message from the rail industry has been clear: investment in that asset has too often been characterised by cycles of ‘boom and bust’, with uneven and uncertain funding and procurement putting the viability of employers (including SMEs) at risk and delaying much-needed improvements to the network. The capacity of the railway to flourish under Great...
Why linked: Committee transcript fragment positioning rail as 'core national asset' supporting Bill scrutiny
The UK rail network is a core national asset, supporting its own industrial ecosystem and underpinning broader economic growth and employment. The message from the rail industry has been clear: investment in that asset has too often been characterised by …
We recommend that the Government commission an independent review of the beginning of Control Period 7 in comparison to the beginning of previous Control Periods. The review should also survey the volatility of spend within Control Periods, identify whether this is systemic, and consider whether they could be better managed to smooth the flow of work. It should seek early lessons from the new partnership model being pursued in the Southern region, and consider whether more certainty could be ...
Why linked: Transport Committee findings on Control Period 7 and GBR transition
We recommend that the Government commission an independent review of the beginning of Control Period 7 in comparison to the beginning of previous Control Periods. The review should also survey the volatility of spend within Control Periods, identify whether this …
The RNEP should also be a tool for promoting rail infrastructure investment from sources other than central government. We urge the Government to implement the findings of the Office of Rail and Road’s review of the Rail Network Investment Framework, and in the next iteration of the RNEP, identify projects where private sector investment would be welcome, or could be decisive. (Recommendation, Paragraph 71)
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry on RNEP and infrastructure investment alongside GBR
The RNEP should also be a tool for promoting rail infrastructure investment from sources other than central government. We urge the Government to implement the findings of the Office of Rail and Road’s review of the Rail Network Investment Framework, …
The Department should set out in the Long Term Rail Strategy a clear policy statement on its intention to limit the proliferation of rolling stock types. Within two years, the Department and Great British Railways should define a small number of standard train families for use across the national network, to achieve better value for money and an improved experience for passengers, including through more widespread level boarding. These should be deployed and refreshed over successive procurem...
Why linked: Transport Committee recommendation on rolling stock policy within GBR
The Department should set out in the Long Term Rail Strategy a clear policy statement on its intention to limit the proliferation of rolling stock types. Within two years, the Department and Great British Railways should define a small number …
The advent of Great British Railways provides a golden opportunity for decision-makers on the railway to approach investment planning differently. Successive governments must be prepared to commit to reaching a long-term consensus on which investments should be prioritised, and to following through on those decisions. While we accept the legitimacy of different political choices about how to allocate public resources, chopping and changing decisions on infrastructure investment is almost alwa...
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry findings on GBR establishment and industry fragmentation - directly on governance reform
The advent of Great British Railways provides a golden opportunity for decision-makers on the railway to approach investment planning differently. Successive governments must be prepared to commit to reaching a long-term consensus on which investments should be prioritised, and to …
The Long Term Rail Strategy guiding Great British Railways needs to have a timescale of at least 30 years to provide the necessary vision for underpinning shorter-term decisions on specific projects and funding. It also needs to be protected from unnecessary or radical changes of direction that would undermine its value. Significant amendments to the LTRS should require formal consultation with industry and with Parliament. We recommend that the Secretary of State be required to lay the Strat...
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry on Long Term Rail Strategy for GBR
The Long Term Rail Strategy guiding Great British Railways needs to have a timescale of at least 30 years to provide the necessary vision for underpinning shorter-term decisions on specific projects and funding. It also needs to be protected from …
We want Great British Railways to reach its potential for making unified decisions over track and train informed by expertise in railway systems. We expect political leaders to set its strategic direction and hold it accountable for delivery, but micromanagement would work against the best interests of passengers and industry. The Department must be clear about the level of autonomy it expects GBR to exercise in enhancements planning, and how ministerial oversight will be exercised in a way t...
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry on GBR unified decision-making between track and train
We want Great British Railways to reach its potential for making unified decisions over track and train informed by expertise in railway systems. We expect political leaders to set its strategic direction and hold it accountable for delivery, but micromanagement …
The Government intends that Great British Railways should be a responsible guiding mind: to achieve this, it requires independence and protection from political interference in its day-to-day operations. Clause 7 as currently drafted would permit a future Secretary of State, if so minded, to micromanage GBR through directions. The intention of the current Government that the power only be used sparingly could be reflected in the legislation. (Conclusion, Paragraph 20)
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry on GBR independence and governance structure
The Government intends that Great British Railways should be a responsible guiding mind: to achieve this, it requires independence and protection from political interference in its day-to-day operations. Clause 7 as currently drafted would permit a future Secretary of State, …
There are benefits to unified duties but the Bill is insufficiently clear on how they will operate in decision-making, in particular the weighting to be assigned to each factor. The Office of Rail and Road will enforce GBR’s business plan but is not bound by it. If the Government intends ORR to have regard to detail on how to balance duties that is contained in the business plan, it must put that detail into statutory guidance. (Conclusion, Paragraph 38)
Why linked: Transport Committee scrutiny of unified duties in the Bill
There are benefits to unified duties but the Bill is insufficiently clear on how they will operate in decision-making, in particular the weighting to be assigned to each factor. The Office of Rail and Road will enforce GBR’s business plan …
The reliance of the Passengers’ Council on the Office of Rail and Road to take enforcement action could add complexity and delay to an already complicated system for complaints, enforcement and remedies, and we are concerned that an opportunity to streamline these elements of the railway could be missed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 54)
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry on Passengers' Council enforcement and ORR coordination - passenger protection reform
The reliance of the Passengers’ Council on the Office of Rail and Road to take enforcement action could add complexity and delay to an already complicated system for complaints, enforcement and remedies, and we are concerned that an opportunity to …
The clause 18 duty on Great British Railways, the Office of Rail and Road and the Secretary of State, and the clause 36 duty on the Passengers’ Council, should be amended to require these bodies to exercise their functions in a way that improves accessibility of the rail network. (Recommendation, Paragraph 61)
Why linked: Direct parliamentary query referencing specific clauses 18 and 36 of the Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill relating to duties on Great British Railways, ORR, and the Passengers' Council
The clause 18 duty on Great British Railways, the Office of Rail and Road and the Secretary of State, and the clause 36 duty on the Passengers’ Council, should be amended to require these bodies to exercise their functions in …
While the role of open access passenger services is a matter for debate, we note that it is the Government’s clear intention to promote greater freight use of the railway. The appeal mechanism for open access decisions set out in the Bill—applying judicial review principles—is overly narrow and jeopardises this aim. The Bill should be amended to give freight operators the ability to appeal access decisions to the Office of Rail and Road on additional grounds that reflect the outcomes the Gove...
Why linked: Transport Committee inquiry findings on open access and freight within GBR context
While the role of open access passenger services is a matter for debate, we note that it is the Government’s clear intention to promote greater freight use of the railway. The appeal mechanism for open access decisions set out in …
While we recognise the fledging status of the UK Infrastructure Pipeline, we are unconvinced of its current usefulness to stakeholders in the rail industry because of its lack of detail at the necessary scale. We ask the Department for Transport to set out how the UK Infrastructure Pipeline will relate to the RNEP, the purpose of each, and where industry should look for the latest and most detailed information. Wherever there are overlapping sources of information, care is needed to ensure th...
Why linked: Transport Committee observation on the UK Infrastructure Pipeline as it relates to rail.
While we recognise the fledging status of the UK Infrastructure Pipeline, we are unconvinced of its current usefulness to stakeholders in the rail industry because of its lack of detail at the necessary scale. We ask the Department for Transport …
We welcome the provision made in the Railways Bill for a Long Term Rail Strategy: it is long past time that such a vision is set out for the railways. The Strategy must provide a basis for consensus and certainty about long- term investment priorities. If it puts in place stable scaffolding for practical plans and pipelines, the LTRS has the potential to insulate those plans from unnecessary changes of direction or delay, to convey confidence to industry and to bring improvements to the netwo...
Why linked: Transport Committee welcome of the Long-Term Rail Strategy provisions.
We welcome the provision made in the Railways Bill for a Long Term Rail Strategy: it is long past time that such a vision is set out for the railways. The Strategy must provide a basis for consensus and certainty …
The Department for Transport has previously accepted the need to update and streamline the complex and confusing legal framework for transport accessibility. It would be unhelpful were the Railways Bill to add more complexity to this situation, especially if it did not meaningfully add to practical opportunities for enforcement action while doing so. (Conclusion, Paragraph 67)
Why linked: Transport Committee recommendation on transport accessibility law and the Railways Bill.
The Department for Transport has previously accepted the need to update and streamline the complex and confusing legal framework for transport accessibility. It would be unhelpful were the Railways Bill to add more complexity to this situation, especially if it …
We recognise the need for structural change on the railways. We support the main purpose of the Railways Bill: to establish Great British Railways as a single organisation overseeing both track and train, and capable of acting as a ‘directing mind’ for the railway. (Conclusion, Paragraph 3)
Why linked: Transport Committee statement on supporting the main purpose of the Bill.
We recognise the need for structural change on the railways. We support the main purpose of the Railways Bill: to establish Great British Railways as a single organisation overseeing both track and train, and capable of acting as a ‘directing …
Understandably, and as with previous railways legislation, the Railways Bill gives a partial picture of the framework for a new regime under Great British Railways. The Bill is designed to last a long time and is accompanied by various additional documentation. The unpublished documents are important not just for scrutiny, but for confidence throughout the industry. This inquiry has picked up on issues that may be addressed in future documentation, such as issues of accountability and enforce...
Why linked: Transport Committee observation on the Bill providing a partial picture of the GBR framework.
Understandably, and as with previous railways legislation, the Railways Bill gives a partial picture of the framework for a new regime under Great British Railways. The Bill is designed to last a long time and is accompanied by various additional …
Before the Bill reaches Report Stage in the House of Commons the Department for Transport should publish a comprehensive list, with target dates, of decisions, key documents and planned consultations leading up to the establishment of Great British Railways and in its first year of operation. This should include milestones for consultation and negotiation with the affected workforce. (Recommendation, Paragraph 7) Our scrutiny of the Bill
Why linked: Transport Committee recommendation on publication of decisions/documents before Report stage.
Before the Bill reaches Report Stage in the House of Commons the Department for Transport should publish a comprehensive list, with target dates, of decisions, key documents and planned consultations leading up to the establishment of Great British Railways and …
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd (RB33)
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to the appointment of the Chair of British Transport Police, dated 27 January 2026
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on the appointment of the Chair of British Transport Police, relevant to Bill provisions.
Direction: to_committee
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Samaritans (RB32)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by FirstGroup (supplementary) (RB31)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Consumer Scotland (RB30)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by London TravelWatch (RB29)
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to the Railways Bill, dated 21 January 2026
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail to Public Bill Committee on the Bill (Jan 2026).
Direction: to_committee
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Lumo and Hull Trains (RB28)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Transport for All (supplementary) (RB27)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Transport UK (TUK) (RB26)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Danny Meers (RB25)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Wheels for Wellbeing (RB24)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by ASLEF (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen) (RB23)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by techUK (RB22)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Railways Pension Scheme Trustee Company Limited (RPTCL) and Railpen (RB21)
Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the appointment of Chair of Network Rail, dated 12 January 2026
Why linked: Letter from Secretary of State regarding Network Rail Chair appointment - governance implementation material for Great British Railways transition
Direction: to_committee
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by London St. Pancras Highspeed (RB01)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by DP World (RB20)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Friends of Squires Gate (RB19)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Greater Manchester Combined Authority (RB18A)
Railways Bill — Written evidence: Letter submitted by Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester (RB18)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Trainline (RB17)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by ALLRAIL (Alliance of Passenger Rail New Entrants) (RB16A)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by ALLRAIL (Alliance of Passenger Rail New Entrants) (RB16)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport UK (RB15)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Transport Focus (RB14)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Independent Rail Retailers (IRR) (RB13)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Urban Transport Group (RB12)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by We Own It (RB11B)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by We Own It (RB11A)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Online Travel UK (RB10)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Arriva UK Trains (RB09)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Office of Rail and Road (RB08)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) (RB07)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Rail Freight Group (RFG) (RB06)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Railway Industry Association (RB05)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by the Regulatory Policy Committee (RB04)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by National Skills Academy for Rail (RB03)
Railways Bill — Written evidence submitted by Campaign for Better Transport (RB02)
2025
Letter from the Cabinet Secretary for Transport and North Wales, Welsh Government relating to the Railways Bill, dated 26 November 2025
Why linked: Letter from Welsh Cabinet Secretary for Transport on the Railways Bill (Nov 2025).
Direction: to_committee
Letter from the Leader of the House relating to the passage and scrutiny of the Railways Bill, dated 11 November 2025
Why linked: Letter from Leader of the House on the passage and scrutiny of the Railways Bill.
Direction: to_committee
Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the introduction of the Railways Bill, dated 5 November 2025
Why linked: Letter from SoS for Transport on the introduction of the Railways Bill.
Direction: to_committee
Railways Bill
Why linked: Briefing on the Government introducing the Railways Bill to deliver GBR (Nov 2025).
The Government has introduced the Railways Bill to Parliament to legislate for its commitment to unify network operations with infrastructure management under a single organisation – Great British Railways. The Bill is expected to go through ‘line by line’ scrutiny …
Letter from the Chair of the Committee to the Leader of the House relating to the Rail Reform Bill, dated 28 October 2025
Why linked: Letter from Committee Chair to Leader of the House relating to the Rail Reform Bill.
Direction: to_committee
The Government’s franchising reforms offer a clear opportunity to embed stronger and fairer employment practices across the sector. Better pay, fair progression, and stable conditions are not only essential for retaining drivers but are also critical to maintaining reliable and high-quality bus services. Without addressing these workforce issues, the wider goals of reform risk being undermined. (Conclusion, Paragraph 81)
Why linked: Committee transcript fragment on the Government's franchising reforms and employment practices — directly relevant to Bill staff-transfer issues
The Government’s franchising reforms offer a clear opportunity to embed stronger and fairer employment practices across the sector. Better pay, fair progression, and stable conditions are not only essential for retaining drivers but are also critical to maintaining reliable and …
Letter from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport relating to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, dated 10 July 2025
Why linked: Letter from DfT re English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (July 2025) - contextually adjacent to rail devolution/structure reform implications for Great British Railways framework
Direction: to_committee
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to Great British Railways, dated 18 July 2025
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on Great British Railways (July 2025).
Direction: to_committee
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much funding has been (a) allocated to and (b) spent by the Great British Railways Transition Team since it was established; and how many external consultants were employed by that team on 28 April 2025.
Why linked: PQ on funding allocated to and spent by the Great British Railways Transition Team — direct fiscal scrutiny of GBR stand-up.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much funding has been (a) allocated to and (b) spent by the Great British Railways Transition Team since it was established; and how many external consultants were employed by that team …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking with Great British Railways to ensure equality of access to the rail network for (a) nationalised and (b) open access operators.
Why linked: PQ on equality of access on the rail network under GBR — direct on the clause 18 duties.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking with Great British Railways to ensure equality of access to the rail network for (a) nationalised and (b) open access operators.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of Great British Railways providing direct shuttle services for Universal Studios visitors between Luton Airport and Wixams station.
Why linked: PQ on Great British Railways providing services directly — direct on regime.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of Great British Railways providing direct shuttle services for Universal Studios visitors between Luton Airport and Wixams station.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what capital funding will be made available to (a) Network Rail and (b) Great British Railways for Access for All schemes in each of the next five years.
Why linked: PQ on capital funding to Network Rail and GBR — direct fiscal scrutiny of the GBR funding architecture.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what capital funding will be made available to (a) Network Rail and (b) Great British Railways for Access for All schemes in each of the next five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department plans to take with Great British Railways to reduce levels of disruption on railways.
Why linked: PQ on GBR reducing disruption — direct on the performance duties.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department plans to take with Great British Railways to reduce levels of disruption on railways.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether Great British Railways will consider housing growth in capacity planning.
Why linked: PQ on GBR capacity planning and housing growth — direct on clauses 60-63.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether Great British Railways will consider housing growth in capacity planning.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether appointments to Great British Railways will be included in the Public Bodies Order in Council; and whether the Chair will be classified as a Significant Appointment.
Why linked: PQ on GBR appointments and the Public Bodies Order in Council — direct on GBR governance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether appointments to Great British Railways will be included in the Public Bodies Order in Council; and whether the Chair will be classified as a Significant Appointment.
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to Great British Railways and Railways Bill, dated 1 April 2025
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on Great British Railways and the Railways Bill (April 2025).
Direction: to_committee
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will ensure that Great British Railways has a statutory accessibility duty.
Why linked: PQ on statutory accessibility duty for GBR — direct on the clause 18 accessibility duty debate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will ensure that Great British Railways has a statutory accessibility duty.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the new Great British Railways ticketing system will automatically identify the cheapest combination of fares for each journey.
Why linked: PQ on the new GBR ticketing system automatically identifying cheapest fares — direct on clauses 3 and 33-34.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the new Great British Railways ticketing system will automatically identify the cheapest combination of fares for each journey.
As part of a new Inclusive Transport Strategy, the Government must set out concrete timescales for achieving independent accessibility across the rail network, and commit to setting out within 12 months a road map for how to meet those timescales. This road map must inform the rolling stock, station and network enhancements strategies of the Department and, when it is operational, Great British Railways. (Recommendation, Paragraph 59)
Why linked: Committee finding on Inclusive Transport Strategy timescales for independent accessibility — relevant to the EIA and accessibility roadmap.
As part of a new Inclusive Transport Strategy, the Government must set out concrete timescales for achieving independent accessibility across the rail network, and commit to setting out within 12 months a road map for how to meet those timescales. …
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he plans to lay a new Official Statistics Order to designate Great British Railways’ statistical outputs as official statistics.
Why linked: PQ on Official Statistics Order designation for GBR statistics — direct on GBR institutional architecture.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he plans to lay a new Official Statistics Order to designate Great British Railways’ statistical outputs as official statistics.
Letter to the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to the rail reform consultation, dated 12 March 2025
Why linked: Letter to Minister for Rail on the rail reform consultation (March 2025).
Direction: from_committee
Letter from the Permanent Secretary of the Department for Transport relating to PAC’s 38th Report of Session 2023-2024, Rail reform: The rail transformation programme, 27 February 2025
Why linked: Letter from Permanent Secretary on PAC report on Rail Reform: rail transformation programme (March 2025).
Direction: to_committee
Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the launch of legislation to implement rail transformation
Why linked: Letter from Secretary of State for Transport on launch of legislation to implement rail transformation (February 2025) - foundational announcement of the railways reform bill programme
Direction: to_committee
Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to oral evidence session on 22 January 2025, dated 6 February 2025
Why linked: Letter from Minister for Rail on oral evidence session on rail reform (Feb 2025).
Direction: to_committee
2024
Correspondence from Dame Bernadette Kelly DCB, Permanent Secretary, Department for Transport, re Rail reform: The rail transformation programme - Oral evidence, dated 7 May 2024
Why linked: Correspondence from Permanent Secretary on rail reform: oral evidence (May 2024).
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from Dame Bernadette Kelly, Permanent Secretary, Department for Transport, re Rail reform the rail transformation program, dated 7 May 2024
Why linked: Correspondence from Permanent Secretary on rail reform transformation programme (May 2024).
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from Dame Bernadette Kelly, Permanent Secretary, Department for Transport, re Follow-up to the session of Monday 29 - Rail reform: the rail transformation programme, dated 7 May 2024
Why linked: Correspondence from Permanent Secretary on rail reform transformation programme (May 2024).
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from the Minister of State, Department for Transport relating to rail services and Infrastructure, dated 26 March 2024
Why linked: Correspondence from Minister of State for Transport on rail services and infrastructure (March 2024) — predecessor regime period
Direction: unknown
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill published on 20 February 2024 do not reference the expected £1.5 billion in recurring annual savings after an initial five year implementation
Why linked: PQ on supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill published on 20 February 2024 do not reference the expected £1.5 billion in recurring annual savings after an initial five year …
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Written Statement of 20 February 2024 on Government response to the consultation on rail reform legislation and draft Rail Reform Bill, HCWS267, what estimate he has made of the savings av
Why linked: PQ on the draft Rail Reform Bill and rail reform consultation response.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Written Statement of 20 February 2024 on Government response to the consultation on rail reform legislation and draft Rail Reform Bill, HCWS267, what estimate he has made of …
Correspondence from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the publication of draft Rail Reform Bill, dated 20 February 2024
Why linked: Correspondence from SoS Transport on publication of draft Rail Reform Bill (Feb 2024).
Direction: unknown
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what his planned timetable is for the publication of the draft Rail Reform Bill.
Why linked: PQ on timetable for publication of the draft Rail Reform Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what his planned timetable is for the publication of the draft Rail Reform Bill.
2023
Correspondence from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the Draft Rail Reform Bill pre-legislative scrutiny
Why linked: Correspondence from SoS Transport on Draft Rail Reform Bill pre-legislative scrutiny.
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport, relating to rail services and infrastructure, dated 20 July 2023
Why linked: Minister for Rail correspondence on rail services and infrastructure (Jul 2023) – ongoing reform and passenger-facing policy development
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from the Chief Executive, Transport Focus, relating to minimum service levels for rail, dated 4 April 2023
Why linked: Transport Focus correspondence on minimum service levels for rail; directly relevant to passenger protections in scope
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from the Minister for Rail, relating to rail services and infrastructure, dated 7 March 2023
Why linked: Minister for Rail correspondence on rail services and infrastructure (Mar 2023) – relevant to rail reform agenda and passenger service aspects
Direction: unknown
Correspondence from the Secretary of State for Transport, relating to rail reform - the next steps, dated 10 February 2023
Why linked: Ministerial correspondence from Secretary of State for Transport on rail reform – the next steps (Feb 2023) – direct policy development document for Great British Railways and passenger reform
Direction: unknown
2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department’s plans to produce a (a) Great British Railways White Paper and (b) new Transport Bill in this session of Parliament to implement the proposals in that White Paper.
Why linked: Written question directly asking about Great British Railways White Paper and new Transport Bill plans – foundational legislative intent document
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department’s plans to produce a (a) Great British Railways White Paper and (b) new Transport Bill in this session of Parliament to implement the proposals in that White Paper.
2021
After our evidence session, on 20 May, the Department published its long-delayed Rail white paper, which outlines its “once-in-a-generation” reforms planned for the rail system, including replacing franchising and better integrating infrastructure with passenger services.25 The Department acknowledges that it must overcome a “complex and…deep-rooted set of issues” to improve the system, and that such a large reform programme will be fraught with risks.26 Despite this, the Department told us i...
Why linked: Department for Transport Rail White Paper (May 2021) outlining the foundational 'once-in-a-generation' rail reform policy that underpins the Railways and Passenger Benefits Bill and Great British Railways establishment.
After our evidence session, on 20 May, the Department published its long-delayed Rail white paper, which outlines its “once-in-a-generation” reforms planned for the rail system, including replacing franchising and better integrating infrastructure with passenger services.25 The Department acknowledg
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the legislation required to implement the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail will repeal the (1) Railways Act 1993, (2) Railways Act 2005, and (3) Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regul
Why linked: PQ on whether legislation will repeal the Railways Act 1993 — direct predecessor question for this thread.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the legislation required to implement the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail will repeal the (1) Railways Act 1993, (2) Railways Act 2005, and (3) Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regul
Loading new-since list…
Loading External Lens…
Analyst briefing
Executive summary
The Railways Bill 2024-26 (Bill 325 as introduced; Bill 373 as amended in Committee) is the structural follow-up to the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024 1 and operationalises Labour's 2024 manifesto commitment to bring rail back into public ownership 2. It creates Great British Railways as a publicly-owned 'directing mind' that unifies track and train, replaces the ORR's access decision-making on the GBR network with an appellate function applying judicial-review principles, redesigns the periodic-review funding cycle into a Secretary-of-State-led business-plan settlement, and consolidates passenger-protection functions from ORR, Transport Focus and the Rail Ombudsman into a strengthened Passengers' Council. Introduced on 5 November 2025, the Bill cleared Commons Public Bill Committee on 10 February 2026 3 and is in the Report-stage amendment-paper run 4 with the Scottish LCM secured on 24 March 2026 5.
Current state
The Bill sits between Public Bill Committee and Report stage in the Commons. The Committee version (Bill 373) was reprinted on 10 February 2026 with three new clauses inserted — most notably clause 85 on charging for removal of road vehicles and an expanded transfer-schemes schedule 1. Daily amendment papers have been running through March, April and May 2026, with the most recent at the time of this build dated 30 April 2026 2.
Delivery infrastructure is already moving in parallel. DfT Operator Ltd absorbed the first wave of TOC staff on 1 April 2026, prompting written questions about sequencing relative to Royal Assent 3. Two non-executive directors (Laura Shoaf and Tony Poulter) joined the DFTO board on 20 March 2026 4, and Alex Hynes was named CEO of DFTO ahead of the Bill's introduction.
The devolved-government interface is largely settled in principle. The framework MoU with Scottish Ministers and the full MoU with Welsh Ministers were published on 25 March 2026 56, and the Scottish Parliament agreed an LCM the day before 7. The Welsh Senedd equivalent is still expected. The Transport Committee's 8th Report scrutinising the Bill 8 has received a Government response in the 4th Special Report of 24 April 2026 9. The Commons Library briefing CBP-10386 10 and the RPC Green opinion on the DfT IA 11 complete the principal scrutiny inputs.
Recent developments
The most material recent moves cluster around late March 2026. The Department published the framework Memorandum of Understanding with Scottish Ministers and the substantive MoU with Welsh Ministers on 25 March 2026 12, pairing with two same-day press releases announcing the devolved settlements 34. The Equalities Impact Assessment was published the previous day 5. On 17 March 2026 the Department announced Delay Repay reforms intended for delivery under GBR 6 and published the Government response to the ORR's independent review of train-operator revenue-protection practices 7.
DFTO board appointments on 20 March 2026 8 and the 1 April 2026 staff transfers 9 mark the practical stand-up of the GBR operational vehicle. The 24 April 2026 Government response to the Transport Committee's 8th Report (the 4th Special Report) 10 is the principal recent select-committee interaction. Open-access operator concerns about clause 71 have continued to surface in PQs, including PQ 129358 (28 April 2026) on how ORR applies state-aid principles to access applications 11.
What to watch
Report stage and Third Reading in the Commons are the next procedural gates; the daily amendment-paper cadence through April-May 2026 1 suggests the Government is processing a substantial volume of amendments ahead of those stages. Lords scrutiny is then expected to concentrate on the two ECHR-flagged provisions: clause 71's retrospective power to amend existing track access contracts (engaging A1P1) and the ORR's dual statutory roles as access-regime appellate body and statutory consultee on GBR's documents (engaging Article 6(1)) 2. The open-access operator written evidence (Lumo and Hull Trains RB28 3; ALLRAIL RB16/RB16A 45) and PQs from MPs aligned with the open-access market (e.g. PQ 129358 on state-aid principles in access applications 6) signal that the access regime is the live commercial issue. Post-Royal-Assent, two SIs matter most: the clause 1 designation SI that actually creates GBR as a body corporate (without which the new regime is inert) and the first commencement regulations. The Long-Term Rail Strategy under clause 15 and the rail-freight growth target under clause 17 are the first substantive Secretary-of-State outputs the Bill mandates; their content will set the operating frame for GBR's first business plan. The Welsh Senedd LCM has not yet appeared in the events list and is a procedural gap to close before Royal Assent given the Bill's Wales-and-Borders provisions. Workforce-protection issues — pensions 7, collective bargaining 8, conditions and travel facilities 910 — continue to drive PQ activity from MPs allied with rail trade unions and may yet attract Lords amendments.
Risks and uncertainties
The principal risks are concentrated in clause 71 and the access regime. The ECHR Memorandum acknowledges A1P1 engagement and relies on a 'core commercial value' preservation argument plus express compensation provision modelled on the Transport and Works Act 1992 1; whether this survives Lords-level scrutiny is uncertain, particularly given concentrated open-access evidence on the point 234. The Article 6(1) issue around the ORR's dual roles is mitigated in the Memorandum but remains a live design question.
Separately, the Government Response to the Transport Committee (4th Special Report of 24 April 2026 5) is in the events list but the substantive text is not visible in the bodies retrieved for this build, so the Committee's specific concerns and the Government's accommodations on freight and access have not been read directly. Inferred from corpus gap: the Welsh Senedd LCM equivalent of the Scottish LCM 6 is not in the events, which may simply reflect timing or may indicate a procedural step still to be taken — practitioners should confirm separately.
Workforce-pension implications during the staff-transfer cascade are flagged by Railpen's RB21 written evidence 7 and a sustained PQ campaign 89 but the Bill does not contain explicit pension-protection provisions on its face beyond the transfer-schemes framework in Sched
Scope notes
This briefing covers the Railways Bill 2024-26 as the unified Great British Railways / passenger-benefits package referenced in the King's Speech 2026 1. It does not cover the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024 in detail beyond its role as the immediate first-step partner statute 2, the Rail Passengers' Charter private member's bill 3 (a separate parallel vehicle), or freight-specific commercial issues outside the clause 17 freight growth target. The Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 candidates surfaced by retrieval are out of scope — they cover the unrelated planning-NSIP framework and the lexical overlap is from shared 'infrastructure' vocabulary, not subject-matter overlap.
Primary legislation
Bills and Acts this regime substantively depends on. Links go to the bill's own thread on this site (where available) and to bills.parliament.uk.
-
The Bill that is the subject of this thread — when enacted it will be cited as the Railways Act 2026 (already self-referenced in clause 6 of the Bill text).
-
First-step legislation that amended the franchising provisions in the Railways Act 1993 to enable public ownership; the Railways Bill is the structural follow-up.
-
Railways Act 1993 Predecessor regime
Establishes the framework the Bill substantially displaces — sections 17-22C are disapplied for the GBR network; sections 23-31 (franchising) are repealed; section 4 duties are replaced by Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the new Bill.
-
Railways Act 2005 Related framework
Created the periodic review process and devolved Scottish rail functions; the Bill retains Scottish Ministers' s.5 strategy power and replaces the periodic review with the Schedule 2 funding cycle.
-
Transport Act 2000 Related framework
Continues to provide the byelaws-making power exercised in the Railway Byelaws Amendment Order 2025 (SI 2025/1258) alongside Bill passage.
Legal & Policy Framework
The Bill replaces the post-1993 settlement on a single conceptual move: it consolidates 'track' (infrastructure management) and 'train' (most mainline passenger services) inside a single publicly-owned body corporate — Great British Railways — designated under clause 1. GBR inherits the Network Rail Infrastructure Limited corporate shell (preserving contract counterparty continuity), absorbs in-house TOCs via DfT Operator Ltd, and takes over industry-back-of-house functions from the Rail Delivery Group. The Bill's statutory functions in clause 3 read as the operationalisation of a 'directing mind' theory: GBR is the body that plans the network, runs most services, sets fares, sells tickets, and authors industry standards.
Layered over those functions is a duties-and-strategy architecture in Chapter 2 of Part 1. The Secretary of State must publish a Long-Term Rail Strategy and set a rail-freight growth target (clauses 15 and 17). Clause 18 then puts all the principal actors — Ministers, GBR and the ORR — under a common set of general duties: passenger interest including disabled passengers, freight promotion, performance, public interest, and value for public funds. The drafting deliberately mirrors a balancing duty (s.4 Railways Act 1993 style) but extends it across the now-integrated entity so incentives no longer diverge between infrastructure manager and train operator.
The access regime in Chapter 1 of Part 3 (clauses 59-68) is the most significant doctrinal break. The Railways Act 1993 (sections 17-22C) and the 2016 Regulations gave the ORR the power to approve or direct access agreements and to set standard terms on Network Rail's network. The Bill disapplies those provisions for the GBR network and substitutes a GBR-authored regime: GBR publishes the Access and Use Policy, the Infrastructure Capacity Plan, the working timetable, the charging scheme and the performance scheme. The ORR becomes the appeals body, applying High Court / Court of Session judicial-review principles (clause 68(1)) and retaining its appellate role under regulation 32 of the 2016 Regulations for non-GBR infrastructure and service facilities.
The regime sits on two displaced predecessor instruments which the Bill does not repeal wholesale but disapplies for the GBR network: sections 17-22C of the Railways Act 1993 and most of the 2016 Regulations. The Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024 is the first-step partner statute that ended franchising; the Railways Bill is the structural follow-up. Clause 71's power to amend existing track access contracts retrospectively is the bridging mechanism — without it, freight and open-access operators on the GBR network would run on terms keyed to a regulatory architecture (ORR-led periodic review, ORR-set charges) that the Bill is dismantling.
Devolved architecture sits alongside in clauses 23-24 and the published MoUs: Scottish Ministers retain their role as funder and specifier of Scottish passenger services; Welsh Ministers retain Transport for Wales and the Core Valley Lines; both can delegate to GBR, contract with GBR companies, or operate jointly-owned subsidiaries. Mayoral combined authorities get statutory consultee status (clauses 5 and 81). Train-driver licensing (clause 91) and the Cape Town/Luxembourg Protocol provisions (clause 92) are discrete add-ons orthogonal to the structural reform.
Statutory basis
-
Railways Bill 2024-26, clause 1
Empowers the Secretary of State by regulations to designate a body corporate as Great British Railways.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clauses 3 and 13
Sets out GBR's general statutory functions — managing infrastructure, providing passenger services, setting fares and selling tickets, providing industry services, research and standards — and gives GBR power to charge for things done in exercise of those functions.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clauses 7-10
Directions and guidance powers: Secretary of State and Scottish Ministers may direct GBR; consent of Scottish/Welsh Ministers required where directions directly affect functions exercised under devolved arrangements.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clause 15
Requires the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a long-term rail strategy for development and use of the railway network in Great Britain.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clauses 18-19
Imposes general duties on Ministers, GBR and ORR — including duties to promote passenger interests (including disabled passengers), promote rail freight, promote railway-service performance, and take into account safety.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, Chapter 1 of Part 3 (clauses 59-68)
Creates a new access regime for GBR's network: GBR sets the Access and Use Policy, infrastructure capacity plan, working timetable, charging scheme and performance scheme; ORR becomes the appeals body applying judicial-review principles.
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clause 71
Power for the Secretary of State by regulations to make provision about the operation of existing access agreements and access rights on GBR infrastructure, including retrospective amendment.
Railways Bill — Human Rights Memorandum -
Railways Bill 2024-26, Schedule 2
Funding GBR: replaces the existing Schedule 4A Railways Act 1993 periodic review with a new business-plan-driven funding cycle led by the Secretary of State (and parallel Scottish Ministers' provision).
Railways Bill — Bill 373 2024-26 (as amended in Committee) - pdf -
Railways Bill 2024-26, clause 91
Power to amend, update or revoke the Train Driving Licences and Certificates Regulations 2010 and related assimilated law.
Railways Bill — Human Rights Memorandum
Cross-cutting regimes engaged
- ECHR Article 1, Protocol 1 (peaceful enjoyment of possessions) Clause 71's power to amend existing track access contracts retrospectively interferes with property rights of non-GBR operators; the ECHR Memorandum justifies the interference by reference to compensation provisions and the model of the Transport and Works Act 1992.
- ECHR Article 6(1) (fair trial) The ORR's dual statutory roles as access-regime appellate body and statutory consultee on GBR's access documents engage Article 6 fair-trial guarantees; the ECHR Memorandum addresses this directly and points to High Court judicial review as backstop.
- Subsidy Control Act 2022 Schedule 2 Part 3 of the Bill is explicitly headed 'Subsidy Control' — direct public funding of GBR and parallel funding by Scottish Ministers requires subsidy-control compliance, particularly given non-GBR open-access operators competing on GBR infrastructure.
- Public Service Obligations in Transport Regulations 2023 The 2023 PSOTRs (which replaced EU Regulation 1370/2007) provide the framework under which Scottish and Welsh Ministers can secure passenger services through public service contracts with GBR or other public-sector companies — designation under clauses 25-27 keys into this regime.
- Equality Act 2010 Clause 18(2)(a) and 18(3) reference the 'needs of disabled persons' via the Equality Act 2010 definition; the Equalities Impact Assessment maps Bill measures against protected characteristics.
- Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 Clause 2(4) provides that employment by GBR is not Crown employment for the purposes of TULRCA — defining the industrial-relations regime applicable to GBR's workforce and structuring collective bargaining post-transfer.
Key concepts
Great British Railways (GBR)
A body corporate designated by the Secretary of State under clause 1, not enjoying Crown status, with statutory functions to manage railway infrastructure, provide passenger services, set fares, sell tickets, and supply industry services across Great Britain.
Statutory functions of GBR
The list of functions in clause 3(1) plus those conferred by regulations under clause 3(3), the charging power in clause 13, and any other Act-conferred functions, but excluding functions under the 2016 Regulations relating to service facilities.
GBR infrastructure
Railway infrastructure managed by GBR — distinct from non-GBR infrastructure (e.g. Core Valley Lines, HS1, certain freight depots) for which the Railways Act 1993 access regime and the 2016 Regulations are retained.
Access and Use Policy
The principal published document under clause 59 setting out GBR's processes, policies and criteria for access decisions on its network, on which GBR must consult and which must be consistent with legislative requirements, strategies, directions and guidance.
Capacity duty
Duty under clause 63 on GBR to retain sufficient capacity on its infrastructure for particular passenger services it is required to provide and for maintenance/improvement works.
Passenger Watchdog (Passengers' Council)
The strengthened body built out of Transport Focus under Part 2 Chapter 2, retaining the legal name 'Passengers' Council' while operating under a new name, with functions including standards-setting (approved by ORR and Secretary of State), complaints, ADR, investigations and improvement plans.
Periodic-review replacement / business plan cycle
The Schedule 2 funding architecture replacing Schedule 4A Railways Act 1993 — five-year cycle of Secretary of State objectives, ORR advice on alignment, GBR business plan, and Secretary of State approval.
Forward look calendar
-
Commons Report stage and Third Reading following the daily amendment papers run from late February to late April 2026.
-
Lords stages — expect concentrated scrutiny of clause 71 (retrospective amendment of access contracts) on A1P1 grounds and of the ORR's dual roles in the access regime.
-
Royal Assent and renaming as the Railways Act 2026 (the Bill text already refers to itself as such in clause 6).
-
First commencement regulations and the SI under clause 1 designating a body corporate as Great British Railways.
-
Publication of the Long-Term Rail Strategy under clause 15 and the rail freight growth target under clause 17.
-
Welsh Senedd Legislative Consent Motion (the Scottish LCM is already secured).
-
Next tranche of TOCs into public ownership (West Midlands Trains, Govia Thameslink Railway, Chiltern Railways and Great Western Railway, as announced 26 September 2025).
Stakeholder positions
Department for Transport
Owns the Bill and the policy frame; argues from the IA's market-failure analysis (coordination failure, principal-agent issues, externalities, productive inefficiency) that integration of track and train under a single publicly-owned body is the only way to deliver reliability, value for money and passenger experience.Nov 2025Nov 2025Nov 2025
Tension with Office of Rail and Road, RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers), Rail Freight Group, ALLRAIL (Alliance of Passenger Rail New Entrants), Lumo and Hull Trains, Andy Burnham (Mayor of Greater Manchester)
Heidi Alexander
As Secretary of State, has staked political authority on Royal Assent and rapid stand-up of GBR; signed the s.19(1)(a) HRA statement, the HS2 reset statement (HCWS1433, 23 March 2026) and the policy-package introduction.Nov 2025Mar 2026
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
As Minister of State for Transport and former Chair of Network Rail, public statements emphasise rail-infrastructure delivery, accessibility and integrated transport strategy — the operational delivery side of the GBR agenda.Mar 2026Jan 2026Nov 2024
Keir Mather
Leads the line for the Government in Public Bill Committee across all 14 sittings; defends the Bill's architecture clause-by-clause on staff transfer, access regime, fares and accessibility provisions.Feb 2026Feb 2026Feb 2026
Tension with Edward Argar
Edward Argar
Lead Conservative spokesperson in Committee; presses the Government on the displacement of independent regulation, the open-access market and the breadth of delegated powers including clause 71.Feb 2026Feb 2026
Tension with Keir Mather
Olly Glover
On accessibility, fares and rural connectivity: Liberal Democrat lead in PBC pressing for stronger accessibility duties, transparent fares architecture and protection for devolved/local services within GBR.Feb 2026Feb 2026
Transport Select Committee
Published the 8th Report scrutinising the Bill — themes include rail freight protections, accessibility delivery and the design of the access regime; the Government responded via the 4th Special Report in April 2026.Feb 2026Apr 2026
Office of Rail and Road
On access and competition: submitted written evidence RB08 setting out its understanding of its appellate role; previously raised concerns through the consultation about how state-aid and competition principles will be applied when access decisions sit with GBR rather than an independent regulator.Jan 2026Apr 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
Transport Focus
On the Passenger Watchdog: supports the consolidation of consumer functions into the strengthened Passengers' Council built out of Transport Focus, while seeking clarity on standards-setting and ADR scope.Jan 2026
RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers)
On worker protection: written evidence RB07 and a sustained PQ campaign by allied MPs pressing for explicit Bill provisions on jobs, pay, pensions, conditions, travel facilities and collective bargaining during the transition into GBR.Jan 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
ASLEF (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen)
On train-driver licensing and workforce: written evidence RB23 — particular focus on clause 91 reforms to driver licensing and on protecting collective bargaining as drivers transfer into the GBR family.Jan 2026Feb 2026
Rail Freight Group
On the freight target and capacity allocation: written evidence RB06 pressing for the clause 17 freight growth target and clause 63 capacity duty to be robust enough to protect freight paths against GBR's own passenger services.Jan 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
ALLRAIL (Alliance of Passenger Rail New Entrants)
On open access: written evidence RB16 and RB16A — concerned that combining the network manager, the dominant operator and the de facto access-decision-maker in a single body will squeeze open-access operators despite the ORR appeal route.Jan 2026Jan 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
Lumo and Hull Trains
On clause 71: joint open-access evidence RB28 pressing the specific risk that the Secretary of State's power to amend their existing track access contracts retrospectively could erode the commercial basis on which long-term rolling-stock liabilities were taken on.Jan 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
Trainline
On ticket retailing: written evidence RB17 — third-party retailer arguing for the proposed retail code of practice to enforce a level playing field as GBR consolidates the 14 operator ticketing websites into one.Jan 2026
Independent Rail Retailers
On the retail market: written evidence RB13 — independent retailer perspective aligned with Trainline on the need for ORR-enforced fair-treatment obligations on GBR.Jan 2026
Andy Burnham (Mayor of Greater Manchester)
On mayoral powers: letter and supplementary evidence (RB18, RB18A) arguing the statutory consultation role for mayoral combined authorities under clauses 5 and 81 is insufficient — pressing for clearer 'right to request' devolution and influence on service levels, timetabling and rolling-stock deployment.Jan 2026Jan 2026Mar 2026
Tension with Department for Transport
Urban Transport Group
On multi-modal integration: written evidence RB12 supporting the statutory role for combined authorities and pressing for explicit multi-modal duties in the long-term rail strategy.Jan 2026
Regulatory Policy Committee
Issued a Green opinion on the DfT Impact Assessment — confirming the IA's analytical robustness.Nov 2025Nov 2025
DfT Operator Ltd (DFTO)
Consolidation vehicle: absorbed first wave of TOC staff from 1 April 2026 with new board appointments (Laura Shoaf, Tony Poulter) and CEO Alex Hynes — the operational stand-up partner for GBR during designation.Mar 2026Apr 2026
Mark Harper
Conservative predecessor as Secretary of State who published the Draft Rail Reform Bill in February 2024 — established the policy direction that the current Bill operationalises in a more directly public-ownership-led form.Feb 2024Feb 2024Feb 2024
Andrew Ranger
On Wales-and-Borders cross-border services: tabled PQ 129596 (29 April 2026) on cross-border rail connections under GBR including the Wrexham-Shropshire-Midlands Railway.Apr 2026
British Transport Police
Engaged via correspondence on Chair appointment (January 2026) and via consequential provisions in adjacent Crime and Policing Act 2026 will-write letters — institutional interface with GBR yet to be fully specified.Feb 2026
Engaged, but no published position in the corpus
- Lilian Greenwood —
- Jerome Mayhew —
- Railway Industry Association —
- Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee —
- Laurence Turner —
- Rebecca Smith —
- Joe Robertson —
- Edward Morello —
- Daniel Francis —
- Jayne Kirkham —
- Baggy Shanker —
- Sarah Smith —
- Adam Dance —
- Lloyd Hatton —