The taxi and PHV regime in England sits on a statutory base from 1976 (the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, for areas outside London) and a separate London regime under the 1998 Act.
On top of that base, DfT has layered two generations of executive instruments: the Statutory Standards 2020, issued under s.177 of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 and binding licensing authorities to a safeguarding floor; and the non-statutory Best Practice Guidance, most recently updated in November 2023, which fills in operational detail on accessibility, vehicle standards, fees and cross-border hiring 12. The Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles (Safeguarding and Road Safety) Act 2022, fully commenced by SI 2023/460, adds a third layer: a statutory duty on licensing authorities to record and share safeguarding-relevant information through a national database operated by the Local Government Association (NR3). This is the part of the modern stack that already has primary-law backing — the Statutory Standards rely on s.177 guidance, which is binding but not the same as creating new offences or licence categories 1. The doctrinal weakness the draft Bill is positioned to fix is that the 1976 Act predates ride-hailing, cross-border app-based hiring and the modern safeguarding architecture. As a result, central reforms — a national fit-and-proper definition, a national driver database accessible to all authorities, control of cross-border hiring, and reform of the licensing tier — currently sit in statutory guidance or in the LGA-run NR3 register, not in primary legislation. PQs in March 2026 directly probe each of these gaps 345. The draft Bill therefore has two possible doctrinal moves. The first is to convert the Statutory Standards into hard statutory duties (and probably create new offences for breach) and to put NR3 on a statutory footing — a 'codification' move. The second is structural: the parallel January 2026 consultation proposes moving licensing from district councils to upper-tier local transport authorities, which would change WHO licenses, not just HOW 6. The Government has not yet indicated which combination it will adopt; this is the principal design question for pre-legislative scrutiny. The regime intersects with the Equality Act 2010 (disability and assistance-dog duties), data protection law (the Surveillance Camera Commissioner has flagged CCTV-in-vehicles), and the Policing and Crime Act 2017 safeguarding architecture. The Bill will need to align with each of those rather than cut across them 7.