Courts and Tribunals Bill
Parliamentary timeline for Courts and Tribunals Bill, session 39 session. Bill type: Government Bill. Current stage: Report stage.
2026
Additional further written evidence submitted by Both Parents Matter (CTB42)
Written evidence submitted by Callum Brunton (CTB41)
Written evidence submitted by the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (CTB40)
Written evidence submitted by Wales and Chester Circuit (CTB39)
Written evidence: Supplementary submissions and observations from the Bar Council, Criminal Bar Association and Circuit Leaders (CTB38)
Written evidence submitted by Sir Stephen Mitchell (CTB37)
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have carried out an assessment of the impact of clause 17 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill on the ongoing implementation of the 2017 and 2019 Farmer Reviews on the importance of maintaining male prisoners' and
Why linked: Lords PQ on impact of Clause 17 on Farmer Review implementation — directly on-thread.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have carried out an assessment of the impact of clause 17 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill on the ongoing implementation of the 2017 and 2019 Farmer Reviews on the importance of maintaining …
To ask His Majesty's Government whether there has been an impact assessment of clause 17 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill on fathers in prison who are trying to retain parental responsibility.
Why linked: Lords PQ on whether there has been an impact assessment of Clause 17 on fathers in prison retaining parental responsibility — directly on-thread.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether there has been an impact assessment of clause 17 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill on fathers in prison who are trying to retain parental responsibility.
Written evidence submitted by Fair Hearing (CTB36)
Further written evidence submitted by Both Parents Matter (CTB35)
Further written evidence submitted by the Bar Council (CTB34)
Supplementary written evidence submitted by Claire Throssell MBE (CTB33)
Further written evidence submitted by Tim Crosland, PlanB.Earth (CTB32)
Written evidence submitted by Dale Langley Solicitors (concerning clause 17) (CTB31)
Supplementary written evidence submitted by the Victims' Commissioner for England and Wales (CTB30)
Written evidence submitted by the Crown Prosecution Service (CTB29)
Written evidence submitted by JUSTICE (CTB28)
Written evidence submitted by Aftab Ali (CTB27)
Written evidence submitted by Victim Not Suspect (CTB26)
Written evidence submitted by the London School of Economics (CTB25)
Written evidence submitted by the Bar Council (CTB24)
Written evidence submitted by Professor Penney Lewis, Criminal Law Commissioner, The Law Commission of England and Wales (CTB23)
Written evidence submitted by The Family Services Foundation (CTB22)
Written evidence submitted by The Law Society (CTB21)
Written evidence submitted by Teresa P (CTB20)
Written evidence submitted by Drs Brown, Hart, Clack, McKelvey, Maggie Fay and Ali Rowe (CTB19)
Written evidence submitted by Dr Clive Dolphin (CTB18)
Written evidence submitted by Tim Crosland, PlanB.Earth (CTB17)
Written evidence submitted by Mark Wyschna (CTB16)
Written evidence submitted by the Centre for Policy Research for Men and Boys (CTB15)
Written evidence submitted by His Honour Geoffrey Rivlin KC (CTB14)
Written evidence submitted by an individual who wishes to remain anonymous (CTB13)
Written evidence submitted by Sean Merrifield (CTB12)
Written evidence submitted by David Lambert (CTB11)
Written evidence submitted by Both Parents Matter (CTB10)
Written evidence submitted by Professor Rebecca Helm, Evidence-Based Justice Lab, University of Exeter, School of Law (CTB09)
Written evidence submitted by an individual who wishes to remain anonymous (CTB08)
Written evidence submitted by the Magistrates Association (CTB07)
Written evidence submitted by Warwick Dumas (CTB06)
Written evidence submitted by Arajpreet Kaur (CTB04)
Written evidence submitted by an individual who wishes to remain anonymous (CTB03)
Written evidence submitted by Terence Ewing (CTB02)
Written evidence submitted by Frances Carr (CTB01)
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether judges have been consulted about possible increased personal risks of replacing some jury trials with named judge trials as proposed in the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Why linked: PQ asking whether judges have been consulted about personal-risk implications of replacing some jury trials with named-judge trials — directly on Clauses 3-4.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether judges have been consulted about possible increased personal risks of replacing some jury trials with named judge trials as proposed in the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will be eligible for trial without jury by the Crown Court Bench Division proposal in the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Why linked: PQ on which offences will be eligible for trial without jury under the Crown Court Bench Division proposal — directly on Clause 3.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will be eligible for trial without jury by the Crown Court Bench Division proposal in the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will have the right to elect restricted by the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Why linked: PQ on what offences will have the right to elect restricted by the Bill — directly on Clauses 1-2.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will have the right to elect restricted by the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will be reclassified by the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Why linked: PQ asking the Secretary of State for Justice what offences will be reclassified by the Courts and Tribunals Bill — directly on-thread.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what offences will be reclassified by the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Legislative scrutiny: Courts and Tribunals Bill
Why linked: Justice Committee call for evidence specifically on this Bill (27 February 2026), running parallel to Public Bill Committee scrutiny.
The Justice Committee has issued a call for evidence to inform its scrutiny of the Courts and Tribunals Bill. The Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 25 February 2026 and is due to have its Second Reading …