Threads / Environmental Land Management Schemes (ELMS) / We told the Department that we were concerned about the lac…
Written Evidence Published 9 Jan 2022 ↗ View on Parliament

We told the Department that we were concerned about the lack of baseline data, and asked what data it will use to measure environmental improvements.70 In its written evidence, the Green Alliance emphasised the importance of being able to measure outcomes in order to demonstrate value for money. It recommended that the Department should “develop standardised approaches for measuring outcomes and progress towards achieving overall objectives, and make sure they are adequately monitored to prev...

We told the Department that we were concerned about the lack of baseline data, and asked what data it will use to measure environmental improvements.70 In its written evidence, the Green Alliance emphasised the importance of being able to measure outcomes in order to demonstrate value for money. It recommended that the Department should “develop standardised approaches for measuring outcomes and progress towards achieving overall objectives, and make sure they are adequately monitored to prevent potential environmental damage due to mistakes in execution.”71 We observed that in previous schemes payments were based on field sizes, which are ea Type: conclusion | Number: 26 | Response status: not_addressed Government response: 2: PAC conclusion: The Department has not established the metrics that it will need to determine whether ELM is contributing towards the government’s environmental goals. 2: PAC recommendation: The Department should develop clear metrics, and establish robust bas