The regulators have since been asked (along with the rest of government) to model headcount reductions of 20%, 30% and 40%, which would have significant impacts on these plans. In HSE’s case, it explained that if the reductions are modelled on its existing headcount, the cuts will include all planned growth in addition to 20–40% reductions. It told us that reductions in headcount would mean it was not resourced to take on its new functions and maintain existing ones.26 We questioned FSA on ho...

The regulators have since been asked (along with the rest of government) to model headcount reductions of 20%, 30% and 40%, which would have significant impacts on these plans. In HSE’s case, it explained that if the reductions are modelled on its existing headcount, the cuts will include all planned growth in addition to 20–40% reductions. It told us that reductions in headcount would mean it was not resourced to take on its new functions and maintain existing ones.26 We questioned FSA on how 20% cuts in veterinarians would impact on it, and it told us that it would have a significant impact on the meat industry which, under current regulati Type: conclusion | Number: 10 | Response status: not_addressed Government response: 3. PAC conclusion: Potential large-scale reductions in staffing levels in regulators will not be achieved without fundamental changes in regulatory approaches. 3. PAC recommendation: The regulators and policy departments should identify the impact of potential cu