Threads / Social Housing Rent Policy / The Government was unable to provide a satisfactory justifi…
Committee Material Published 27 Oct 2022 ↗ View on Parliament

The Government was unable to provide a satisfactory justification, let alone an explanation, as to why DWP reimburses councils for 100% of housing benefit if the provider is registered but only 60% if it is not registered, leaving the council to pick up the rest of the tab. The same 100% subsidy should be paid by DWP whether or not the provider is registered. Later in this report we recommend that all providers be registered. While this will result in increased costs for DWP, this is likely t...

The Government was unable to provide a satisfactory justification, let alone an explanation, as to why DWP reimburses councils for 100% of housing benefit if the provider is registered but only 60% if it is not registered, leaving the council to pick up the rest of the tab. The same 100% subsidy should be paid by DWP whether or not the provider is registered. Later in this report we recommend that all providers be registered. While this will result in increased costs for DWP, this is likely to be offset by savings resulting from implementing our recommendations to drive out unscrupulous, profit-driven providers. (Paragraph 87) Planning and li Type: recommendation | Number: 17 | Response status: under_consideration Government response: 46. Local Authorities administer all the Housing Benefit awards in their area and seek reimbursement for these through the Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP) Housing Benefit subsidy arrangements. The DWP subsidy rules vary according to the type of