Threads / Energy Retail Market Reform / Ofgem’s failure to ensure that energy suppliers were financ…
Committee Material Published 1 Nov 2023 ↗ View on Parliament

Ofgem’s failure to ensure that energy suppliers were financially resilient resulted in costs to energy consumers and taxpayers when these energy companies failed. To encourage new suppliers into the market and encourage price competition and innovation, Ofgem took a ‘low bar’ approach to licencing new retail energy suppliers. Between 2010 and May 2022, at least 73 new energy suppliers entered the market. However, over the same period, at least 65 suppliers exited the market. Between July 2021...

Ofgem’s failure to ensure that energy suppliers were financially resilient resulted in costs to energy consumers and taxpayers when these energy companies failed. To encourage new suppliers into the market and encourage price competition and innovation, Ofgem took a ‘low bar’ approach to licencing new retail energy suppliers. Between 2010 and May 2022, at least 73 new energy suppliers entered the market. However, over the same period, at least 65 suppliers exited the market. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 29 energy suppliers (including Bulb) failed, affecting nearly four million households. This has resulted in an estimated cost of £2.7 bill Type: conclusion | Number: 2 | Response status: accepted Government response: The government agrees with the Committee's recommendation. Recommendation implemented As set out in the Energy Security Plan 2023, the government will deliver an energy retail market that works better for consumers, is more resilient and investable, and supports wider