Threads / Pensions Investment Review / Plans for the new DB funding regime were forged in a differ…
Government Response Published 26 Mar 2024 ↗ View on Parliament

Plans for the new DB funding regime were forged in a different era when the vast majority of DB schemes were in deficit and amidst concern that employers were seeking to evade their responsibility to underfunded schemes. Despite significant changes since then—improved funding levels and what these mean for future policy—the fundamental principles underpinning the new regime are unchanged: schemes are expected to target a position of low dependency at the point of significant maturity. While w...

Plans for the new DB funding regime were forged in a different era when the vast majority of DB schemes were in deficit and amidst concern that employers were seeking to evade their responsibility to underfunded schemes. Despite significant changes since then—improved funding levels and what these mean for future policy—the fundamental principles underpinning the new regime are unchanged: schemes are expected to target a position of low dependency at the point of significant maturity. While we welcome the changes made by DWP and TPR to allow more flexibility in the investment approach, it is unclear what the overall effect will be. Schemes ha Type: conclusion | Number: 3 | Paragraph: 35 | Response status: under_consideration Government response: This Government supports the principle that Parliament should be provided with the details it needs to make a truly informed decision on legislation it is being asked to consider. We remain committed to positive engagement with Parliament on