The debate over the existential risk—or lack of it—posed by the increasing prevalence of AI has attracted significant attention. However, the Government’s initial assessment, that such existential risks are high impact but low probability, appears to be accurate. Nevertheless, given the potential consequences should risks highlighted by the AI Safety Institute and other researchers be realised, it is right for Governments to continue to engage with experts on the issue.

The debate over the existential risk—or lack of it—posed by the increasing prevalence of AI has attracted significant attention. However, the Government’s initial assessment, that such existential risks are high impact but low probability, appears to be accurate. Nevertheless, given the potential consequences should risks highlighted by the AI Safety Institute and other researchers be realised, it is right for Governments to continue to engage with experts on the issue. Type: conclusion | Number: 60 | Paragraph: 209 | Response status: under_consideration Government response: DSIT has established the Central AI Risk Function (CAIRF), which sits within the AI Policy Directorate and works hand in hand with the AI Safety Institute. It is the central coordination function on AI for the Government and aims to reduce the likelihood and impact of AI-related risks. This includes