We are concerned that the certification schemes that are intended to prove that biomass used in the UK is sustainably sourced may not be fit for purpose.12 DESNZ told us that they and Ofgem have benchmarked these third–party certification schemes to ensure that they are in line with the sustainability criteria.13 We have also received a written submission from Drax setting out how the Sustainable Biomass Programme (SBP), the largest certification scheme, is underpinned by independent audits w...

We are concerned that the certification schemes that are intended to prove that biomass used in the UK is sustainably sourced may not be fit for purpose.12 DESNZ told us that they and Ofgem have benchmarked these third–party certification schemes to ensure that they are in line with the sustainability criteria.13 We have also received a written submission from Drax setting out how the Sustainable Biomass Programme (SBP), the largest certification scheme, is underpinned by independent audits which conclude on whether suppliers meet the SBP’s standards.14 However, several stakeholders have written to us expressing concern that such schemes are Type: conclusion | Number: 9 | Response status: not_addressed Government response: 1. PAC conclusion: DESNZ has relied for too long on an untested approach to ensure biomass generators are meeting sustainability criteria for receiving financial support. 1. PAC recommendation: DESNZ should complete a comprehensive assessment of the strength of its