The GCF accepted that the playbook needed to be enhanced and improved, and said that in doing so it would involve GDS. It explained that its aim was to ensure that the playbook was “really fit for purpose”, in terms of where government wanted to move forward in the digital landscape.36 GDS agreed that there were some areas that it would like to emphasise more, including: ensuring that there would be clear guidance on joint commercial and digital leadership for procurements; and describing how...

The GCF accepted that the playbook needed to be enhanced and improved, and said that in doing so it would involve GDS. It explained that its aim was to ensure that the playbook was “really fit for purpose”, in terms of where government wanted to move forward in the digital landscape.36 GDS agreed that there were some areas that it would like to emphasise more, including: ensuring that there would be clear guidance on joint commercial and digital leadership for procurements; and describing how things should work across the lifetime of the relationship, not just up to the point of contracting. It also told us that it was considering including g Type: conclusion | Number: 22 | Response status: accepted Government response: 3.5 The government agrees with the committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: December 2025 3.6 The government is taking forward the actions outlined below on which we will update the Committee on progress in December 2025: 3.7 The Digital, Data and Techn