Threads / Digital ID and Access to Public Services / Making public services work for you with your digital ident…
Open Consultation Published 10 Mar 2026 ↗ View on GOV.UK

Making public services work for you with your digital identity – Consultation document (PDF)

Above all, the digital ID will be useful. It will help people to prove who they are and things about themselves, like their age, in the public and private sectors.

▤ Verbatim text from source document

Cabinet Office

Making public services
work

for

you

with

your

digital

identity
Presented to Parliament by the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister at the Cabinet Office by Command of His Majesty March 2026 CP 1498

© Crown copyright 2026
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0
except

where

otherwise

stated.

To

view

this

licence,

visit
nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain
permission

from

the

copyright

holders

concerned.

This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents.
Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at publiccorrespondence@cabinetoffice.gov.uk.
Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from: www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-the-cabinet-office.
ISBN 978-1-5286-6190-4 E03528850 03/26
Printed on paper containing 40% recycled fibre content minimum
Printed

in

the

UK

by

Cabinet

Office

Contents
Ministerial foreword .......................................................................................................... 9 Executive summary ......................................................................................................... 11 How to respond to this consultation ......................................................................... 14 Part 1: Our ambition ....................................................................................................... 15 Proving identity digitally ............................................................................................ 16 Chapter 1.1: Our proposed solution ............................................................................ 17 Chapter 1.2: What the digital ID means for you .......................................................... 18 Chapter 1.3: Next steps .............................................................................................. 19 Part 2: Our approach ...................................................................................................... 21 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 21 Chapter 2.1: Creating the digital ID ............................................................................. 21 Building on existing infrastructure ............................................................................ 21 Underpinning the digital ID in law ............................................................................. 22 Issuing the digital ID ................................................................................................. 22 Devolved and Common Travel Area considerations ................................................ 24 Chapter 2.2: Storing, managing and using the digital ID ............................................. 26 Storing the digital ID ................................................................................................. 26 Digital verification services ................................................................................... 26 Updating the digital ID .............................................................................................. 26 Deleting and revoking the digital ID ......................................................................... 27 Using and checking the digital ID ............................................................................. 27 Intermediary services ............................................................................................ 28 Government Checker service ............................................................................... 28 Part 3: Useful .................................................................................................................. 32 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 32 Chapter 3.1: Information contained in the digital ID .................................................... 32 Core information about an individual ....................................................................... 33 Information to support joined-up public services ...................................................... 34 Consideration of further information ......................................................................... 34 Address ................................................................................................................. 34 6

Sex or gender information .................................................................................... 35 Keeping details up to date ....................................................................................... 35 Chapter 3.2: Transforming public services .................................................................. 38 How digital ID can help ............................................................................................ 39 Digital ID as the foundation of transformed public services ..................................... 40 Chapter 3.3: Utility in the wider economy .................................................................... 44 Chapter 3.4: Tackling illegal working ........................................................................... 48 How right to work checks could change ................................................................... 48 Business support ...................................................................................................... 49 Part 4: Inclusive .............................................................................................................. 51 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 51 Chapter 4.1: Eligibility for the digital ID ....................................................................... 51 Minimum age for eligibility ........................................................................................ 51 Lowering the minimum age of eligibility to 13 ....................................................... 51 Providing everyone with the ability to have a digital ID from birth ........................ 52 Chapter 4.2 Unlocking access across society ............................................................. 55 Traditional identity document exclusion ................................................................... 55 Digital inclusion ........................................................................................................ 55 Groups requiring targeted support ........................................................................... 56 Chapter 4.3 Commitment to supporting inclusion ....................................................... 59 Practical onboarding support ................................................................................... 59 Digital inclusion support ........................................................................................... 59 Chapter 4.4 Accessibility ............................................................................................. 61 Chapter 4.5: Alternative access routes ....................................................................... 63 Part 5: Trusted ................................................................................................................ 65 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 65 Chapter 5.1: Data protection and privacy .................................................................... 65 Building on existing progress ................................................................................... 65 Exercising greater consent and control .................................................................... 66 Privacy by design and default .................................................................................. 67 Chapter 5.2: Securing the national digital ID system .................................................. 70
7

Building on existing cyber security best practice and processes ............................. 70 Vulnerable and at-risk individuals ............................................................................ 70 National security ....................................................................................................... 71 Lawful access ........................................................................................................... 71 Police powers ........................................................................................................... 71 Chapter 5.3: Fraud as a national challenge ................................................................ 74 Chapter 5.4: Ensuring strong oversight and governance ............................................ 77 Existing oversight structures .................................................................................... 77 Additional oversight arrangements ........................................................................... 77 Part 6: Wider Summary of Impacts ................................................................................. 81 Impact on households .............................................................................................. 81 Impact on the public sector ...................................................................................... 82 Impact on the Economy ........................................................................................... 84 Impacts on the existing DVS sector ...................................................................... 84 Impacts on relying parties ..................................................................................... 85 Impacts on employers ........................................................................................... 86 Impact on illegal workers ...................................................................................... 87

8

Ministerial foreword
Currently, it’s too hard to get what you need from the government, when you need it. The current legacy system of call centres, paperwork and the need to tell your story
multiple

times

to

different

parts

of

government,

with

hours

on

hold

and

not

knowing

where

you

are

in

the

process,

is

not

good

enough.
In its place, we will build a truly modern Britain where public services work for you. A new digital state – that will be there for you when you need it most. But first, we need to build the foundations for these new modern public services. That’s what the digital ID system is for. It will be free to access for anyone who wants it and it will be built on three core
principles:

It must be usefulIt needs to be easier than the old telephone and paper-based
system.

It must be secureYou will have more control over what data you share and we
expect

nothing

less

than

banking

levels

of

security.

It must be for everyoneWe won’t leave people behind and will help you if you
struggle

with

technology

or

don’t

have

other

forms

of

ID,

like

a

passport,

for

example.

With digital ID, you’ll be able to login to the GOV.UK App and prove who you are. But
unlike

an

ordinary

login,

digital

ID

will

work

across

different

departments

and

come

together

in

the

GOV.UK

App

on

your

phone

so

you

can

access

all

of

the

services

you

need

in

one

place.
We know there’s been a significant level of public interest in the digital ID system, which
is

why

we’re

launching

this

national

conversation,

so

you

can

have

your

say

on

how

it

is

built.
This consultation seeks your feedback on how to build a system that is useful for
everyone,

to

help

you

access

the

services

you

need.
For example, what information could be useful to include in the new digital proof of
identity

to

stop

the

rummage

for

a

utility

bill

or

bank

statement?

Which

government

services could

be

improved?

Like

getting

a

driving

licence

or

checking

your

tax

code?

And

how

will

we

make

sure

everyone

is

included?
Our baseline is to start with the fewest data points possible, enough to simply prove you
are

who

you

say

you

are

and

nothing

more

but

if

more

is

needed

to

support

the

uses

you

and

other

members

of

the

public

want,

like

proving

your

address,

that’s

something

we’ll

explore.
We cannot continue on this two-track approach where services in the private sector are
fast,

easy

and

digital

and

those

in

the

public

sector

are

slow,

clunky

and

disjointed.
9

This is why this government is doing the hard work to build the foundations of the
modern

state

and

the

public

services

of

the

future.
The digital ID system will help transform public services but we want you to want it and
be

part

of

it.
Now is your chance.

Rt Hon Darren Jones MP
Chief

Secretary

to

the

Prime

Minister

10

Executive summary
The government intends to introduce a national digital ID (identity document) system.
This

will

sit

at

the

heart

of

next-generation

digital

public

services

in

the

UK

and

support

innovation

in

the

wider

economy.

It

will

help

unlock

entirely

new

ways

to

offer

goods

and

services,

and

be

key

to

making

people’s

interactions

with

the

state

as

efficient

and

useful

as

those

they

are

accustomed

to

in

the

private

sector,

like

online

banking.

At its heart, this system is about making people's everyday lives easier by modernising
old-fashioned

processes.

The

new

digital

ID

will:

● be a convenient way for people to prove who they are ● be secure and put people more in control of their data ● offer everyone eligible access to an inclusive ID, without up-front charges ● help government to reduce bureaucracy and build the intuitive, efficient, and
responsive

public

services

the

UK

deserves

11

We want people in the UK to shape the system and how it will work to ensure these
objectives

can

be

achieved.

This

is

why

we

are

running

a

wide-reaching

and

inclusive

consultation

to

gather

views

and

bring

people

together

for

discussion

and

debate,

ultimately

informing

our

future

design

choices.

We propose that three core principles will guide the design of the new digital ID. It must
be:

● Useful : widely usable across the economy as a way for individuals to prove their
identity

and

central

to

the

next

generation

of

public

services
● Inclusive: available to create and access at no cost to individuals and inclusive
by

design

helping

those

who

currently

struggle

to

prove

who

they

are

or

are

digitally

excluded
● Trusted: underpinned by robust privacy, resilience and security measures that
put

people

in

control

built

to

rigorous

government

standards

for

digital

verification

services

We are designing the new digital ID as something people will want to get, rather than
something

they

must

have.

There

will

be

no

legal

obligation

for

people

to

have

or

present

the

digital

ID.

The digital ID will primarily be stored as a digital document on someone’s device, such
as

compatible

smartphone

or

tablet.

We

expect

it

to

include

their

full

name,

date

of

birth,

a

photo

and

nationality

though

not

all

of

this

information

will

need

to

be

shared

in

full

when

the

digital

ID

is

used.

For

example,

where

possible

it

will

just

share

that

a

person

is

‘over-18’

or

has

a

right

to

work,

rather

than

sharing

their

full

date

of

birth

or

nationality.
To deliver the new system in the most cost-effective way possible, we will be expanding
on

existing

government

systems

which

are

already

successfully

proving

and

verifying

people’s

identities.

This consultation is structured as follows● Part 1: Our ambition introduces the current landscape before setting out our
goals

for

the

new

system

and

the

high-level

benefits

it

will

bring

to

people

across

the

UK
● Part 2: Our approach describes how we are intending to build the digital ID
system,

harnessing

the

government’s

existing

investments

in

developing

a

digital

state.

It

explains

the

lifecycle

of

the

digital

ID

how

it

will

be

issued,

where

it

will

be

stored

and

how

it

can

be

shared

and

checked
● Part 3: Useful discusses how the digital ID system has the potential to help us
consistently

identify

people,

so

we

can

reduce

bureaucracy

and

build

more

intuitive,

efficient,

and

responsive

public

services

in

the

future.

It

explains

how

it

will

be

usable

in

the

wider

economy,

and

how

we

will

make

use

of

the

digital

ID

to
12

help tackle illegal working, so that only those with the right to work in the UK can
do

so.

These

chapters

ask

questions

about

what

information

should

be

included

on

the

digital

ID

and

how

it

could

be

most

useful

to

you
● Part 4: Inclusive covers the government’s plans for an ID and digital inclusion
drive,

to

make

the

digital

ID

available

and

accessible

to

all.

It

discusses

who

will

be

eligible,

including

the

minimum

age

for

the

digital

ID. It

invites

views

on

what

groups

may

need

extra

support,

what

their

needs

are

and

what

alternative

access

routes

could

look

like

● Part 5: Trusted includes information on how we will design the new system to
ensure

that

everyone

can

have

confidence

that

it

will

protect

their

data.

It

includes

discussion

of

technical

security

measures,

data

protection

standards

and

how

people

can

exercise

greater

consent

and

control

when

using

the

digital

ID.

There

is

also

a

chapter

on

governance

and

oversight
● Part 6: Wider considerations outlines our early assessment of the potential
impacts

of

the

system

and

the

value

we

believe

it

could

have,

from

helping

us

build

more

intuitive,

efficient,

and

responsive

public

services

to

reducing

friction

in

the

wider

economy

A national digital ID system is vital public infrastructure for the digital age. We want to
draw

on

the

expertise

and

wisdom

of

a

wide

range

of

stakeholders,

from

businesses

to

trade

unions,

technologists

and

civil

society,

as

well

as

leaders

in

the

public

and

private

sectors

who

can

use

the

digital

ID

to

improve

services

for

people

in

the

UK.

Key

design

decisions

will

only

be

taken

after

this

consultation,

to

build

the

best

possible

product

for

everyone.

We

are

grateful

to

everyone

who

takes

the

time

to

participate.
13

How to respond to this consultation The consultation is open from 10 March to 5 May.
You can respond to the consultation questions via this survey link: http://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-public-services-work-for-you-with-your-digital-identity.
Alternatively, you can send responses to consultation@digitalid.cabinetoffice.gov.uk.
You will receive an automated email confirmation if your email response is successfully
received.

Responses can be sent by post toc/o Digital ID
Cabinet Office
70 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2AS When responding, please state whether you are responding as an individual or
representing

the

views

of

an

organisation.

Your response will be most useful if it is framed in direct response to the questions
posed,

though

further

comments

and

evidence

are

also

welcome.

You can find the privacy notice for this consultation here.
Following this initial 8-week consultation period, we will be running a ‘People’s Panel on
Digital

ID’

an

in-depth

deliberative

engagement

process

with

a

broadly

UK

representative

sample

of

120

individuals

to

discuss

the

policy

in

detail.

Individuals

will

be

selected

through

sortition

(civic

lottery).

Participants will be invited to a series of in-person and online workshops where they will
learn

about

the

policy

area

through

expert

presentations

and

panel

discussions.

They

will

be

supported

by

expert

facilitators

to

consider

diverse

perspectives

and

weigh

trade-offs

before

working

towards

a

shared

set

of

recommendations

for

government.

This

process

will

conclude

on

21

June,

which

will

be

the

end

of

the

formal

consultation

process.

14

Part 1Our ambition
In the UK, we lack a single, authoritative way to prove that we are who we say we are.
Online

and

offline,

public

and

private

services

frequently

ask

us

to

prove

our

identity,

but

we

have

to

do

so

using

a

range

of

documents

that

were

never

intended

to

play

this

part

like

passports,

driving

licences

and

utility

bills.

This

generates

needless

bureaucracy

and

leaves

many

struggling

to

afford,

find

or

assemble

evidence

of

their

identity

in

their

interactions

with

government

and

in

the

wider

economy.

This leads to several problems● Proving identity is confusing, complex and burdensome – people can find
having

to

navigate

different

documents

and

paperwork

for

different

purposes

frustrating

and

repetitive,

while

government,

businesses

and

other

organisations

must

also

juggle

this

complexity.

This

places

unnecessary

burdens

on

people

and

creates

unnecessary

cost

and

administration,

undermining

efficiency

in

both

the

public

and

private

sectors.
● Government cannot deliver the modern public services that many people
expect

not

having

a

single

proof

of

identity

which

allows

public

services

to

consistently

refer

to

people

hampers

this

government’s

ambition

to

make

them

easy

to

access,

more

joined-up

and

responsive

to

people’s

needs

and

entitlements.

This

prevents

faster,

more

proactive

and

personalised

digital

transformation

in

the

public

sector,

trapping

people

in

rounds

of

bureaucracy.
● Unnecessary data security risks are created – in order to prove their identity,
people

must

hand

over

substantial

amounts

of

personal

data;

usually

more

than

is

necessary.

Worse,

organisations

often

store

copies

of

physical

documents

used

for

identification,

increasing

the

risks

of

data

leaks

and

knock-on

issues.

● A core group of disadvantaged people face persistent exclusion – Cabinet Office research shows that 1 in 10 people in England, Scotland and Wales do not hold an in-date and recognisable photo ID, and the Lloyds Bank 2023 Consumer Digital Index indicates around 25% struggle to use digital services online. The most trusted documents – like passports and driving licences – come with a cost
to

obtain,

while

a

lack

of

digital

skills

and

smartphone

ownership

can

create

further

exclusion.

This

locks

people

out

of

society,

and

especially

the

benefits

of

digitalisation.

● We are saddled with high levels of fraud – relying on a variety of physical
documents

also

leaves

room

for

abuse.

Between

June

2024

and

2025,

fraud
accounted for 44% of crime in England and Wales, according to the Office for National Statistics. Fake or stolen driving licences and passports are used by criminals to circumvent identity checks, and over 118,000 identity fraud cases were reported to the National Fraud Database in the first half of 2025. This costs people and organisations time and money to correct when things go wrong. 15

Proving identity digitally Evidence suggests there is a better way to do identity verification. Digital identity
documents

(‘IDs’)

have

clear

advantages

over

paper-based

alternatives

they

can

be

safer,

more

secure

and

more

convenient.

For

instance,

digital

anti-fraud

and

security

checks

can

provide

greater

confidence

that

someone

is

who

they

say

they

are.

And,

if

someone’s

device

is

stolen,

they

can

protect,

lock

and

wipe

it

remotely.

This

helps

keep

people’s

information

safe

and

makes

it

harder

for

criminals

to

misuse

identities

that

do

not

belong

to

them.

A digital ID system also helps unlock entirely new ways to offer goods and services,
such

as

the

intuitive,

efficient,

and

responsive

public

services

the

UK

deserves.

An

authoritative

understanding

of

someone’s

identity

must

underpin

this

work,

giving

public

services

confidence

in

who

they

are

dealing

with

and

the

means

to

support

people

across

departmental

siloes.

With

this

key

building

block

in

place,

public

services

could

better

work

for

individuals,

moving

away

from

old-fashioned

and

bureaucratic

processes,

towards

proactive,

hassle-free

services

that

are

delivered

when

people

need

them

and

in

ways

that

work

for

them.

For

example,

when

changing

their

name,

someone

could

tell

us

once

with

the

change

automatically

updated

across

government

services,

without

needing

to

tell

departments

one

by

one.

People across the EU and the rest of the world are already enjoying the many benefits
of

digital

identities:

In Australia , people can use their digital ID to access over 246 government
services

alongside

a

range

of

private

services,

from

banking

to

buying

alcohol.

This

reduces

the

need

for

multiple

separate

accounts

and

pieces

of

paper

In Denmark , 97% of residents over the age of 15 use the national digital ID
system,

transforming

their

daily

lives.

For

example,

students

can

log

in

and

automatically

retrieve

their

education

records

and

qualifications

in

job

and

university

applications

In Estonia , digital signatures enabled by the digital ID system are estimated to
save

the

nation

2%

of

its

entire

economic

output

annually.

The

system

also

saves

people

time

and

effort,

meaning

they

never

have

to

provide

the

same

information

to

government

twice

However, progress in the UK has been slower. Within government, initiatives like
GOV.UK

One

Login

and

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

are

beginning

to

revolutionise

how

people

access

online

public

services

providing

a

single

‘front

door’

to

government

and

allowing

people

to

store

secure

digital

documents

instead

of

paper.

In

the

private

sector,

digital

verification

service

(DVS)

providers

operating

under

the

Data

(Use

and

Access)

Act

2025,

are

also

popularising

digital

identities.

But,

in

many

scenarios,

how

we

prove

and

demonstrate

our

identity

in

the

UK

is

still

too

burdensome,

complex

and

outdated,
16

with many people unable to benefit from a DVS. Without government providing a
foundational

digital

ID,

many

in

the

UK

will

continue

to

rely

on

paper-based

documents,

especially

those

who

face

ID

or

digital

exclusion.

If the UK is to fully realise the benefits of digital identities, we must ensure that everyone
can

access

a

secure

digital

ID,

and

that

they

are

supported

to

do

so.

To

keep

pace

with

the

private

sector

and

be

a

world

leader

in

digital

public

services,

we

must

modernise

our

approach

to

identification,

using

the

best

of

technology

to

ensure

everyone

in

the

UK

can

access

the

public

and

private

services

they

need,

when

they

need

them.

Chapter 1.1: Our proposed solution
To realise these benefits in the widest possible range of scenarios, the government has
committed

to

creating

a

new

national

digital

ID

that

will

be

useful,

inclusive

and

trusted.

Above all, the digital ID will be useful. It will help people to prove who they are and
things

about

themselves,

like

their

age,

in

the

public

and

private

sectors.

It

will

enable

them

to

access

a

range

of

services

more

easily,

better

safeguard

their

information

and

privacy

and

give

them

more

control

over

how

their

data

is

handled

by

others.

If

trusted

by

the

public

and

widely

adopted,

this

will

save

time,

reduce

duplication

and

create

a

basis

for

future

innovation,

driving

down

traditional

forms

of

fraud.

The digital ID system will also be inclusive. For the first time, a digital identity solution
will

be

freely

available

for

all

eligible

British

and

Irish

citizens

and

foreign

nationals

with

permission

to

be

in

the

UK.

As

part

of

the

system,

we

will

launch

an

inclusion

programme.

This

will

also

help

ensure

those

who

do

not

have

a

compatible

device,

such

as

a

smartphone

or

tablet,

are

less

digitally

confident

or

face

particular

challenges

such

as

those

without

permanent

addresses

are

not

excluded.

This

will

include

looking

at

alternative

access

routes,

such

as

physical

products

that

still

facilitate

digital

checks

and

in-person

support,

as

well

as

the

ability

to

have

trusted

individuals

(e.g.

carers,

parents)

act

Wal

of

others.

Finally, the digital ID will be trusted. Experts at the National Cyber Security Centre will
provide

advice

on

its

design

from

the

outset.

Core

principles,

such

as

data

minimisation,

will

be

built

in

from

the

beginning,

and

the

solution

will

build

on

existing

secure

infrastructure,

including

the

passport

service,

the

eVisa

service,

GOV.UK

One

Login

and

the

GOV.UK

Wallet.

This

means

the

new

digital

ID

will

be

saved

securely

on

a

person’s

phone,

putting

them

in

control

of

that

information,

with

most

government

data

staying

where

it

is

already

safely

stored,

in

government

departments.

17

Chapter 1.2: What the digital ID means for you
The range of ways people can choose to use their digital ID will grow over time. Early
on,

we

expect

it

will

be

usable

for

simple

things

in

the

private

sector,

like

proving

age

when

purchasing

alcohol.

In

these

use

cases,

people

will

also

be

able

to

continue

using

any

other

alternatives

they

already

use

if

they

prefer

there

will

be

no

requirement

to

use

the

new

digital

ID.

Access to public services will not be made dependent on having the digital ID. However,
for

those

who

choose

to

take

part,

the

digital

ID

system

will

provide

a

simple

access

point

for

new,

modern

digital

public

services,

deepening

and

accelerating

the

work

GOV.UK

One

Login

is

already

doing.

By

providing

everyone

eligible

with

a

trusted

digital

identity,

which

will

support

government

to

match

and

verify

existing

information

about

people

across

multiple

public

services

in

responsible,

privacy-enhancing

ways,

it

will

be

possible

to

deliver

the

services

they

need

more

quickly

and

effectively

without

creating

a

single

database

of

all

government

data

about

a

person.

This

will

also

support

the

delivery

of

more

proactive

public

services,

meaning

people

could

be

able

to

automatically

get

the

support

to

which

they

are

entitled

in

a

personalised

way.

Another early priority for the digital ID system will be to support further efforts to tackle
illegal

working.

Those

who

work

in

the

UK

without

the

right

to

do

so

undermine

those

who

play

fairly

by

the

rules.

By

the

end

of

this

Parliament,

the

digital

ID

will

therefore

have

a

central

role

in

the

UK’s

right

to

work

regime.

All employers in the UK already have a responsibility to prevent illegal working.
Currently,

they

can

do

this

by

conducting

prescribed

right

to

work

checks

before

employing

someone.

As

part

of

this

consultation,

we

are

proposing

to

legislate

so

that

evidence

must

be

checked

digitally

as

part

of

a

prescribed

right

to

work

check.

The

evidence

which

can

be

checked

by

a

robust

digital

process

will

include

the

digital

ID,

alongside

British

and

Irish

biometric

passports

(and

Irish

passport

cards)

and

eVisas.

This

will

be

the

only

way

for

a

business

to

demonstrate

that

they

have

carried

out

a

right

to

work

check

to

prevent

illegal

working.

The move to digital checking against this narrowed range of evidence will simplify
compliance

for

individuals

and

businesses.

For

individuals,

it

will

be

easier

to

demonstrate

a

right

to

work,

while

it

will

streamline

the

recruitment

process

for

businesses

and

create

a

digital

audit

trail

of

where

checks

have

been

carried

out

to

support

enforcement.

Removing

reliance

on

paper

documents

will

also

make

it

harder

for

criminals

to

use

forged

documents

to

gain

employment

and

prevent

unscrupulous

employers

from

turning

a

blind

eye

to

questionable

documentation,

helping

ensure

fairness

in

the

labour

market.

18

Chapter 1.3: Next steps
We intend for the digital ID to be available to those who want one by the end of this
Parliament,

following

the

necessary

technical

build

and

Parliamentary

approval

for

the

underpinning

legislative

changes.

Further

benefits

will

follow

as

the

system

helps

us

to

enable

the

streamlined,

digital,

lifelong

public

service

provision

that

people

expect

from

government.

The digital ID system will only be a success if people trust it. This trust will only be built
if

they

have

a

genuine

opportunity

to

shape

the

system,

which

is

why

we

have

decided

to

take

a

new

approach

to

this

consultation

that

goes

beyond

simply

asking

for

comments

on

proposals.

We

will

ensure

we

make

targeted

efforts

to

involve

those

who

may

be

most

affected

by

the

proposals,

along

with

including

those

whose

voices

are

often

missing

from

more

traditional

consultations

because

of

digital

exclusion

or

other

systemic

barriers.

This exercise will be conducted in two stages. The first will involve 8 weeks of open
engagement

running

from

10

March

to

5

May

where

anyone

who

wants

to

take

part

can

share

their

views.

Alongside

an

online

engagement

platform,

we

will

support

local

conversations

and

events

across

the

UK.

This

includes

roadshows,

roundtables,

as

well

as

resources

to

help

communities

run

their

own

discussions

in

ways

that

work

for

them.

In the second stage, which will follow the open engagement, we will bring together a
broadly

representative

group

of

100-120

people

from

across

the

UK

to

take

part

in

a

‘People’s

Panel

on

Digital

ID’

an

in-depth

deliberative

engagement

process.

This

group

will

hear

views

shared

during

the

open

engagement

stage,

discuss

different

perspectives,

and

openly

debate

areas

of

disagreement.

We

will

support

them

to

work

together

to

weigh

the

trade-offs

involved,

explore

common

ground

and

develop

shared

recommendations

for

government.

This

group

will

not

make

decisions,

but

their

recommendations

shaped

by

views

shared

in

the

open

engagement

phase

will

help

to

inform

next

steps.

Together, these two stages will create an open and inclusive way for the public to be
involved

in

shaping

decisions

about

the

digital

ID

system.

We

will

also

continue

to

engage

with

expert

stakeholders

throughout

the

duration

of

the

consultation

and

beyond.

Views shared in both these stages will be carefully considered by the government to
develop

next

steps

for

the

digital

ID

system.

A

formal

government

response

to

the

consultation

will

be

published

once

all

stages

of

the

consultation

have

concluded

and

all

responses

have

been

properly

considered.

You can find more information about the consultation and how to get involved in the two stages on GOV.UK. You can also access the full text in a range of accessible formats. 19

Questions on Part 1Our Ambition
1.0.Q1. What do you think the main benefits will be, if any, for the government’s
new national digital

ID system?

1.0.Q2. What do you think the main drawbacks will be, if any, for the government’s
new national digital

ID system?

1.0.Q3. One of the government’s aims for the new national digital ID system is to make
it

easier

for

people

to

prove

who

they

are. To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree

that the proposed system could help achieve

this

aim,

and

why?

a. Strongly Agree
b. Somewhat Agree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
d. Somewhat Disagree
e. Strongly Disagree
f. Don’t know
i. 1.0.Q3.1 Please explain your answer
1.0. Q.4 The government proposes to use the digital ID system to enable more modern,
efficient

and

personalised

public

services. Which

public

services

would

you

want

the

government

to

prioritise

making

faster

or

more

efficient

using

the

system?

20

Part 2Our approach
Introduction
As set out above, the government intends to create a national digital ID that will be
useful,

inclusive

and

trusted.

To

support

informed

discussion

of

how

the

digital

ID

system

could

work

in

practice,

this

consultation

begins

by

outlining

our

approach

to

creating,

storing

and

using

the

digital

ID.

While

final

design

decisions

have

not

yet

been

made,

this

explanation

will

be

vital

for

engaging

meaningfully

with

the

remainder

of

the

consultation.

Chapter 2.1: Creating the digital ID
Building on existing infrastructure In January 2025, we set out our diagnosis of the problems the government faces with
digital

technology

in

the

State

of

Digital

Government

Review
.

This

was

accompanied

by

our

plan

of

action

in

the

Blueprint

for

Modern

Digital

Government
,

which

this

year’s

Roadmap

for

Modern

Digital

Government

has

put

into

motion.

As

part

of

the

six-point

plan

for

government

digital

reform,

we

have

committed

to

strengthen

and

extend

our

digital

and

data

public

infrastructure

and

join

up

public

services.

This

means

improving

the

interface

between

people,

the

government

and

public

services

through

the

use

of

technology.

Being

able

to

prove

your

identity

quickly

and

securely

through

the

digital

ID

system

is

key

to

delivering

on

this

vision.

Where possible, the digital ID will build on existing systems that are already operating
as

trusted

parts

of

government.

This

infrastructure

will

be

expanded

and

improved

to

meet

the

increased

demands

of

the

digital

ID

system

and

to

bring

its

benefits

to

people

sooner

leveraging

the

expertise

that

has

already

gone

into

creating

secure

and

accessible

digital

solutions.

The four most relevant existing services are● GOV.UK One Login allows people to prove their identity once before using that
digital

identity

to

access

more

than

122

services

across

government.

It

is

being

rolled

out

across

all

central

government

services

to

replace

the

previous

landscape

of

siloed

and

duplicate

sign-in

methods

for

public

services.

All

government

services

are

due

to

be

onboarded

by

the

end

of

2027

● The GOV.UK Wallet enables GOV.UK One Login users to store and present
digital

versions

of

government-issued

documents

on

their

phones.

This

includes

the

Veteran

Card

and

soon

to

be

introduced

Digital

Driving

Licence.

It

provides

21

users with greater security when sharing government documents, and gives
users

more

control

over

what

information

they

share

when

proving

things

about

themselves,

like

age

or

identity

● The passport service, which is administered by HM Passport Office, part of the
Home

Office.

HM

Passport

Office

is

the

sole

issuer

of

UK

passports

and

is

an

authoritative

source

for

information

about

nationality

for

British

citizens

● The eVisa service , which is administered by UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI),
part

of

the

Home

Office.

eVisas

are

the

authoritative

source

for

identity

and

information

about

immigration

status

for

foreign

nationals

in

the

UK,

and

have

largely

replaced

physical

immigration

documents

(such

as

biometric

residence

permits).

This

improves

efficiency

for

service

providers

and

increases

security

and

fraud

prevention,

helping

to

deliver

a

modern

border

and

immigration

system

Additionally, an infrastructure for the trusted creation and use of digital identities already exists, including the UK digital identity and attributes trust framework (the ‘trust framework’). This is a statutory framework of standards, rules and best practice that
government

publishes

to

show

what

a

good

digital

verification

service

(DVS)

looks

like,

against

which

a

DVS

can

be

independently

certified.

Certified

DVS

providers

can

apply
to have their services appear in the statutory register of digital identity and attribute services, maintained on GOV.UK. This infrastructure helps people and organisations to find a trustworthy DVS. We intend for the national digital ID to operate within this
ecosystem.

We

expect

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

(which

will

hold

the

digital

ID)

to

be

certified

as

a

DVS,

and

GOV.UK

One

Login

(as

the

umbrella

service)

will

seek

to

maintain

its

certification

against

the

trust

framework.

Underpinning the digital ID in law Unlike other digital versions of government-issued documents, like the forthcoming
Digital

Driving

Licence,

the

digital

ID

will

have

no

direct

historical

precursor.

The

government

will

be

issuing

eligible

applicants

with

a

new

digital

document, explicitly

meant

to

serve

as

a

standalone

and

authoritative

proof

of

identity.

We

intend

to

legislate

and

ensure

Parliamentary

scrutiny

of

new

measures

to:

● create and issue the digital ID ● administer relevant identity and eligibility information on an ongoing basis ● manage the digital ID throughout its lifecycle (for more information on storing,
managing

and

using

the

digital

ID,

see

Chapter

2.2)

Issuing the digital ID In general terms, issuance will proceed via the following steps:
● An individual will apply online for the digital ID, prompting them to login or create
an

account

with

GOV.UK

One

Login

22

● The individual may need to verify their identity (if they have not sufficiently done
so

previously)

and

will

need

to

prove

their

eligibility

for

the

digital

ID.

This

will

depend

on

what

evidence

they

can

present,

leading

them

down

one

of

the

following

routes:

o If they can verify their identity using a UK passport or eVisa, their
information

is

automatically

checked

with

the

authoritative

source

(HM

Passport

Office

or

UKVI)

o If they are a British citizen and do not have a UK passport, they will be
directed

to

a

service

that

will

inclusively

support

them

to

prove

their

identity

and

nationality

(similar

to

HM

Passport

Office’s

first

adult

passport

service)

o If they are an Irish citizen, or cannot follow one of the above routes, they
will

need

to

provide

appropriate

evidence

of

their

identity

and

nationality.

As

outlined

below,

this

will

take

account

of

the

arrangements

of

the

Common

Travel

Area

(CTA)

as

well

as

the

rights

recognised

under

the

Good

Friday

Agreement

● On successful verification of their identity and/or eligibility, the government will
issue

the

individual

with

a

digital

ID,

tied

to

their

GOV.UK

One

Login

account

The digital ID will primarily be issued to people in a digitally protected format – known as
a

‘verifiable

credential’

that

can

be

stored

on

a

device,

such

as

a

compatible

smartphone

or

tablet.

This

will

be

similar

to

how

people

already

store

digital

payment

cards

and

tickets.

Key

considerations

for

the

standards

it

will

be

built

to

will

include:

● security ● widespread acceptance across a range of businesses and organisations ● potential for interoperability (within the UK, Common Travel Area and abroad) ● support for privacy-enhancing technologies like selective disclosure
Box 2.1.1. What is a verifiable credential?
Verifiable credentials are digital documents. Like physical documents, people can use
verifiable

credentials

to

confirm

their

eligibility

to

perform

specific

activities

or

verify

claims

about

themselves.

They

typically

contain

information

about

the

person

they

belong

to,

such

as

their

name

and

photograph.

As

they

are

secured

and

presented

via

technical

means,

verifiable

credentials

can

also

be

confirmed

as

genuine

when

they

are

used

for

instance,

proving

they

have

been

issued

by

an

authoritative

body

like

a

government

department,

and

have

not

been

faked,

tampered

with

or

revoked.

23

In addition to this standard route, we are also considering whether alternative routes to
accessing

the

digital

ID

will

be

needed,

to

ensure

that

all

eligible

individuals

can

access

the

system.

More

details

can

be

found

in

Part

4,

on

making

the

digital

ID

inclusive.

Devolved and Common Travel Area considerations We want to ensure that all British and Irish citizens, and people with permission to be in
the

UK,

can

use

and

benefit

from

the

digital

ID.

We

are

committed

to

working

with

the

devolved

governments

to

ensure

that

the

digital

ID

system

will

work

effectively

across

the

whole

UK,

recognising

that

many

of

the

services

where

citizens

could

benefit

from

the

use

of

digital

ID

are

devolved

matters,

which

are

the

responsibility

of

the

devolved

governments.

The introduction of this new system will take account of the arrangements under the
Common

Travel

Area

(CTA)

as

well

as

the

rights

afforded

to

people

under

the

Good

Friday

Agreement.

In this regard, we respect the right of the people of Northern Ireland under the Good
Friday

Agreement

to

identify

as

Irish,

British,

or

both,

and

to

hold

British

and/or

Irish

citizenship

without

differential

treatment.

There

will

be

no

requirement

that

Irish

nationals

take

British

citizenship

in

order

to

benefit

from

the

digital

ID

system.

We will also respect the arrangements under the CTA between the UK, the Crown
Dependencies

(Bailiwick

of

Jersey,

Bailiwick

of

Guernsey

and

the

Isle

of

Man)

and

Ireland.

British and Irish citizens will continue to be allowed to move freely, as now, to reside in
either

jurisdiction,

and

to

enjoy

associated

rights

and

privileges

including

the

right

to

work,

study

and

vote

in

elections,

as

well

as

to

access

social

welfare

benefits

and

health

services.

The

rights

of

cross-border

workers,

who

live

in

Ireland

and

work

in

Northern

Ireland

or

Great

Britain

and

then

return

home

(or

vice

versa),

will

be

carefully

considered.

The Government will continue to work with the Northern Ireland Executive, the Welsh
Government,

the

Scottish

Government,

the

Crown

Dependencies,

and

the

Government

of

Ireland

with

the

aim

of

ensuring

the

digital

ID

system

is

developed

in

line

with

the

commitments

outlined

above.

The

Government

will

continue

to

discuss

those

aspects

of

its

digital

ID

proposals,

which

the

Irish

Government

has

an

interest

in,

to

ensure

that

they

are

compatible

with

existing

legal

obligations

and

the

long-standing

arrangements

between

both

countries.

24

Questions about Chapter 2.1: Creating the digital ID
These questions are for experts speaking in their own capacity and for organisations:
2.1.Q1. The national digital ID will be issued as a credential (or digital document) for
storage

on

a

compatible

device,

similar

to

how

people

already

store

payment

cards

and

tickets

on

their

smartphones.

Are

there

technical

issuance

standards,

beyond

those

already

used

by

the

GOV.UK

Wallet,

that

we

should

be

building

the

national

digital

ID

to?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 2.1.Q1.1. Please explain your answer and provide examples of the
technical

standards

that

should

be

used.

This question is for everyone2.1.Q2. Do you have any concerns about the impact of the national digital ID that are
specific

to your part of

the

UK? If

so, please

select

which country and why?

a. Northern Ireland
i. 2.1.Q2.1. Please explain your answer
b. Scotland
i. 2.1.Q2.2. Please explain your answer
c. Wales
i. 2.1.Q2.3. Please explain your answer
d. England
i. 2.1.Q.2.4. Please explain your answer
e. No impact
f. Don’t know

25

Chapter 2.2: Storing, managing and using the digital ID
Storing the digital ID While all users will have the choice to store their digital ID in their GOV.UK Wallet, we
are

open

to

exploring

whether

and

how

it

could

be

made

accessible

through

digital

verification

service

(DVS)

providers,

including

via

storage

in

third-party

holder

(often

referred

to

as

‘digital

wallet’)

services.

Our

main

objective

is

that

any

storage

and

use

of

the

digital

ID

is

secure,

with

only

the

entitled

user

able

to

access

and

use

it.

Digital verification services
It could be possible for an individual to store their national digital ID in third-party holder
services,

via

either

a

direct

download

functionality

or

by

sharing

a

copy

from

their

GOV.UK

Wallet.

People

may

already

use

holder

services

other

than

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

and

prefer

these

for

a

number

of

reasons,

including

perceived

privacy

benefits

and

preferences

around

user

experience.

However, these benefits may be outweighed by reduced public understanding and
reduced

security,

especially

if

information

is

improperly

secured

by

third

parties.

For

instance,

in

Chapter

5.3

we

discuss

how

criminals

could

promote

unofficial

apps

claiming

to

be

the

digital

ID

or

GOV.UK

Wallet

to

trick

users

into

downloading

malware

or

submitting

sensitive

data.

Alternative

holding

solutions

would

therefore

need

to

be

at

least

as

secure

and

resistant

to

fraud

as

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

and

not

introduce

weaknesses

to

the

system.

For

this

reason,

we

would

only

consider

allowing

a

third-party

to

hold

the

national

digital

ID

if

certain

conditions

were

met,

including:

● It was certified as a ‘holder service’ under a current version of the UK digital identity and attributes trust framework, maintained by the Office for Digital Identities and Attributes (OfDIA) in the Department for Science, Innovation and
Technology

(DSIT)
● It appeared on the digital identity and attribute services register ● It had reached a specific agreement with government, including agreement to
any

necessary

terms

and

conditions

that

may

be

informed

by

this

consultation

Updating the digital ID Some information held in the digital ID will be static, like a date of birth, assuming it has
been

correctly

verified.

Other

information

may

change

over

time,

like

someone’s

name

(if

they

get

married

or

change

it

by

deed

poll)

or

their

photo.

However,

in

principle,

any

attribute

about

a

person

will

need

to

be

alterable,

and

their

digital

ID

credential

reissued,

in

case

of

errors

in

the

issuance

process.

Each

digital

ID

will

also

need

to

be

updated

or

reissued

periodically

to

accommodate

technology

changes

or

expiry

dates.

Further

consideration

of

users’

roles

in

keeping

their

digital

ID

up

to

date

is

in

chapter

3.1.

26

Deleting and revoking the digital ID Once issued, an individual may wish to delete their digital ID, or it may need to be
revoked

(i.e.

cancelled),

at

a

later

date.

For

instance,

someone

might

wish

to

remove

their

digital

ID

from

their

own

GOV.UK

Wallet.

They

will

be

able

to

do

this

at

any

time,

and

the

process

will

be

designed

to

be

simple

and

quick.

When a user makes a deletion request, the digital ID will be permanently removed from
their

own

device,

and

will

no

longer

be

usable

unless

they

choose

to

redownload

it.

Relevant

government

departments

will

retain

any

relevant

records

that

underpin

the

individual’s

digital

ID

in

line

with

their

data

retention

policies

and

privacy

notices

much

like

how

deleting

an

app

does

not

automatically

delete

any

account

needed

to

use

that

app.

This

is

necessary

to

meet

legal

and

regulatory

obligations,

such

as

ensuring

the

security

and

integrity

of

the

service

and

preventing

fraud.

Users

will

need

to

contact

the

relevant

department

directly

if

they

wish

to

exercise

their

right

to

object

to

this

processing.

As

we

continue

to

join

up

public

services

through

this

system,

we

will

explore

how

this

process

could

be

simplified.

The government will also need the power to revoke a person’s digital ID in limited
circumstances,

such

as

if

fraudulent

usage

is

identified.

Revocation

will

only

occur

in

strictly

controlled

circumstances,

and

robust

processes

will

be

designed

to

govern

revocation

and

other

procedures.

For

more

information,

see

Chapter

5.4

on

Oversight

and

Governance.

Using and checking the digital ID Once a digital ID has been created, people will need ways of reliably sharing it with
those

who

need

to

check

it,

whether

that

is

a

public

service,

a

business,

charity

or

another

person.

These

checkers,

known

as

‘relying

parties’,

need

to

have

confidence

that

the

data

is

accurate

and

has

not

been

tampered

with

so

that

they

can

rely

on

it.

Unlike with physical documents, information on the digital ID should not be relied upon
without

being

checked

through

technological

means.

This

is

because

‘visual

inspection’

(i.e.

where

a

person

simply

shows

their

digital

ID

on

their

device’s

screen

to

a

relying

party)

could

allow

someone

to

show

a

faked

or

edited

screen

that

human

eyes

cannot

detect.

Instead,

the

digital

ID

will

need

to

undergo

a

technical

check,

via

a

process

called

‘programmatic

verification,’

whenever

it

is

presented.

For instance, rather than someone just showing their digital ID to a shop assistant, they
would

present

it

from

their

GOV.UK

Wallet

to

be

scanned

by

the

shop

assistant.

The

assistant

might

use

a

device

provided

by

their

employer

or

a

physical

terminal,

like

a

payment

terminal

used

for

contactless

payments,

to

do

this.

This

will

help

confirm

that

a

digital

ID

has

not

been

faked,

tampered

with

or

revoked.

27

Intermediary services
We expect most checking in the wider economy to be done by intermediary DVS
providers

and

remain

committed

to

the

model

underpinned

by

the

Data

(Use

and

Access)

Act

2025.

To

deliver

on

our

goals

of

maintaining

end-to-end

security

and

trust,

only

DVS

providers

that

are

certified

under

a

current

version

of

the

trust

framework

and

present

on

the

government

register

will

be

able

to

programmatically

verify

a

digital

ID

presented

from

the

GOV.UK

Wallet,

offering

robust

checks

as

a

service

to

relying

parties.

Several

such

‘orchestration’

services

are

already

available

from

providers

on

the

government

register.

We expect DVS will want to provide a variety of checking services (with user
agreement),

such

as:

● offering sophisticated checks which are suitable in commercial settings or
regulated

industries
● including functionality such as record keeping for auditing purposes ● integrating the digital ID into existing user journeys in the wider economy (such
as

payments

journeys)

Separately, we intend for suitably certified and registered DVS providers to be able to build on the digital ID in the same way that we have discussed elsewhere for other credentials in the GOV.UK Wallet. For example, a DVS provider could use information
from

the

national

digital

ID

in

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

to

create

their

own

new

digital

credential,

potentially

combined

with

other

information

they

have

sourced.

This

is

also

known

as

a

‘derived

credential’

which

could

be

used

to

prove

a

range

of

different

things

about

someone.

Government Checker service
We also intend to develop a ‘Government Checker’, which will support orchestration and
credential

verification.

This

service

will

support

public

sector

relying

parties

to

consume

and

trust

credentials,

including

the

national

digital

ID,

in

a

range

of

scenarios.

We

intend

for

the

Government

Checker

to

be

certified

and

registered

as

a

DVS

under

the

Data

(Use

and

Access)

Act

2025.

When someone presents their digital ID (or another credential) from their GOV.UK
Wallet,

the

relying

party

checking

the

credential

will

be

able

to

scan

it

using

the

Government

Checker.

The

person

whose

GOV.UK

Wallet

it

is

will

then

be

asked

to

approve

sharing

the

requested

information,

before

the

relying

party

is

likely

to

receive:

● confirmation that the presented digital ID is valid and trustworthy ● the key data for that use case, which could be limited so that only necessary
information

is

shared

(for

instance,

that

the

person

is

over

18,

rather

than

sharing

their

full

date

of

birth)
28

● a photo of the person to whom the digital ID belongs so they can confirm it is
being

presented

by

the

right

person

Given the importance of programmatic checking and robust data sharing for all
transactions,

we

are

also

exploring

whether

a

basic

Government

Checker

service

should

be

made

available

for

free

or

at

low

cost

to

relying

parties

in

the

private

and

third

sector.

In

these

instances,

we

would

envisage

several

limitations

to

the

service

by

design.

For

instance,

it

would

only

verify

government-issued

credentials,

not

those

made

by

private

sector

DVS,

and

could

have

other

functionality

or

usage

limits.

This

is

because

the

Government

Checker

would

not

be

meant

for

verification

at-scale

or

use

in

most

commercial

settings.

Outside

of

government,

it

would

instead

be

intended

to

remove

the

risk

of

visual

presentation

in

certain

low-volume

use

cases.

For

instance,

even

if

it

was

made

widely

available,

we

expect

that

companies

conducting

large

numbers

of

right

to

work

or

age

verification

checks

would

be

better

served

by

third-party

DVS

providers

providing

a

specialist

service.

We

welcome

views

on

this

proposal.

29

Questions about Chapter 2.2: Storing, Managing and Using the digital ID
These questions are for everyone:
Someone might wish to delete their own digital ID from their device. They will be able to
do

this

at

any

time,

and

the

process

will

be

designed

to

be

simple

and

quick.

2.2.Q1. Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to an
individual

deleting

their

digital

ID?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 2.2.Q1.1 Please explain your answer.

Under strictly controlled circumstances, the government may also have the power to
revoke

(i.e.

cancel)

someone’s

digital

ID

for

instance,

if

someone’s

digital

ID

has

been

identified

as

stolen

or

used

fraudulently.

This

will

be

governed

by

robust

processes.

2.2.Q2. Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to revoking
(i.e.

cancelling)

an

individual’s

digital

ID?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 2.2.Q2.1 Please explain your answer.

2.2.Q3. Do you think people should be able to choose to store their national digital ID
directly

in

holder

services

(sometimes

known

as

‘digital

wallets’)

other

than

the

GOV.UK

Wallet, that are

certified

to meet

government

standards?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 2.2.Q3.1. Please explain your answer.

30

These questions are for experts speaking in their own capacity or for organisations:
2.2.Q4. To support secure use, there needs to be a robust way to check the national
digital

ID

presented

from

the

GOV.UK

Wallet.

This

will

help

confirm

it

has

not

been

faked,

tampered

with

or

revoked.

The

private

sector

has

already

developed

free

and

paid-for

checking

services.

In

addition,

we

are

considering

creating

a

‘government

checker’

service. To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree

with

the

proposed

government

checker

service

being

made

available

for

use

in

the

private

and

third

sectors,

at

low

or

no

cost?

a. Strongly agree
b. Somewhat agree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
d. Somewhat disagree
e. Strongly disagree
f. Don’t know
i. 2.2.Q4.1. Please explain your answer

2.2.Q5. We are considering several limitations to the government checker service, by
design.

For

instance,

it

could

only

be

able

to

check

government-issued

credentials,

like

the

national

digital

ID.

This

is

intended

to

leave

room

for

third-party

checking

services.

Are

there

any

specific

limitations

you

think

we

should

set

for

the

government

checker?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 2.2.Q5.1. Please explain your answer

31

Part 3Useful

Introduction
The national digital ID will be transformative for government services and sectors across
the

economy.

Our

aim

is

that

the

national

digital

ID

will:

1. sit at the heart of next-generation public services 2. give people a foundational and trusted proof of identity for use across the
economy
3. underpin a simpler and more secure model to prevent illegal working
The digital ID is being designed as something which people will want to have, rather
than

something

they

are

forced

to

get.

In

all

cases,

our

intention

is

that

it

will

be

acceptable

alongside

other

suitable

proofs

and

not

replace

other

government-issued

documents

people

might

already

have.

For

example,

the

digital

ID

will

not

assert

entitlement

to

drive

or

entitlement

to

cross

borders

which

will

continue

to

require

a

driving

licence

and

passport,

respectively.

However,

we

expect

it

will,

in

time,

reduce

reliance

on

physical

documents

as

people

choose

to

apply

for

and

use

the

digital

ID.

How the digital ID can be used may also vary across the devolved governments of the
UK.

While

immigration

policy

(and

therefore

right

to

work

regulation)

is

reserved,

so

can

be

set

centrally

by

the

UK

government,

devolved

governments

can

have

different

requirements

for

accessing

and

joining

up

public

services,

and

for

some

use

cases

in

the

wider

economy,

such

as

acceptable

proofs

for

age

restricted

goods.

As

outlined

above,

we

will

work

with

the

Welsh

Government,

Northern

Ireland

Executive

and

Scottish

Government

to

seek

consistency

and

usefulness

across

the

country.

Chapter 3.1: Information contained in the digital ID
For the digital ID to be useful in any given setting, it needs to be able to prove
information

relevant

to

that

scenario.

That

information

also

needs

to

be

trusted

by

the

person

or

organisation

checking

it,

and

appropriate

for

the

regulatory

landscapes

in

which

it

operates.

However, no digital ID can, or should, be the definitive proof of every piece of
information

about

an

individual.

The

digital

ID

will

therefore

seek

to

strike

a

balance,
32

holding enough information to usefully prove identity information, without requiring
unnecessary

data

collation

or

storage.

Core information about an individual Each digital ID will contain core information about a person. We propose that this will
include:

● full name (as it appears in official documentation like a passport) ● date of birth (which could be selectively disclosed in different ways, including as
just

an

‘over

18’

or

‘over-65’

attribute)
● nationality (which could be selectively disclosed in different ways, including as
confirmation

that

someone

has

a

right

to

work

in

the

UK)

● a current, high-resolution biometric facial image that meets specified
requirements
Box 3.1.1 Data minimisation and selective disclosure
Data minimisation is a privacy-preserving principle that encourages not collecting,
sharing

or

otherwise

processing

more

personal

data

than

is

necessary

for

a

specific

purpose.

It

is

enshrined

in

the

UK

General

Data

Protection

Regulation

(UK

GDPR).

While the principle is being applied to how the national digital ID is designed, created
and

managed,

it

also

applies

to

how

it

is

used.

For

example,

the

practice

of

‘selective

disclosure’

gives

people

specific

control

of

what

information

they

share,

and

with

who.

When

someone

shows

their

physical

driving

licence

at

a

bar,

they

have

no

choice

but

to

disclose

all

the

information

on

it

including

unnecessary

attributes

like

full

name

and

address

alongside

relevant

information

like

date

of

birth

and

a

photo.

By contrast, the digital ID will go further in preserving privacy by minimising the data it
discloses.

For

example,

where

possible

it

will

just

share

basic

information,

such

as

that

a

person

is

‘over-18’,

rather

than

sharing

their

full

date

of

birth.

The

digital

ID

is

being

built

with

this

functionality

in

mind

to

help

ensure

no

more

personal

data

is

shared

than

necessary

when

the

digital

ID

is

used.

In addition to this core identity information, the digital ID may also need to store and
share

additional

information

or

metadata

(i.e.

data

about

information

held).

This

could

include:

● the level of confidence which government has in the individual’s identity, based
on

the

evidence

provided,

to

help

relying

parties

understand

if

it

meets

their

needs
● whether the person to whom the digital ID relates has an authorised
representative

acting

with

delegated

authority

on

their

behalf,

such

as

through

a

power

of

attorney
33

● other information identified as necessary via this consultation or further policy
development

We believe the information above will provide sufficient basis for the intended uses for
the

digital

ID

(see

the

remainder

of

this

Part),

without

requiring

any

unnecessary

information

to

be

collected

or

shared.

Information to support joined-up public services We are exploring what information is needed to better link public services. Currently,
people

in

the

UK

have

multiple

identifiers,

for

example

National

Insurance

numbers

and

passport

numbers.

This

means

we

cannot

know

when

it

is

the

same

person

accessing

different

services.

Without

this,

it

is

very

difficult

to

match

people

across

services

so

they

can

be

delivered

in

a

personalised

and

efficient

way.

We are considering developing a universal unique identifier (or similar approach) tied to
the

digital

ID

and

GOV.UK

One

Login,

to

enable

consistent

reference

across

government

services.

This

will

be

key

to

delivering

next-generation,

digital

public

services

in

the

UK.

This

identifier

would

not

need

to

be

visible

or

used

outside

the

public

sector,

and

we

are

exploring

providing

it

only

to

those

choosing

to

use

the

digital

ID.

More

information

can

be

found

in

Chapter

3.2

on

Transforming

Public

Services.

Over time, such an approach could streamline information updates, ensuring verified
changes

are

reflected

across

services

and

reducing

the

need

for

people

to

repeatedly

provide

core

information.

It

could

also

support

more

proactive,

personalised

services.

For

example,

if

you

update

your

name

on

the

digital

ID,

this

could

be

updated

automatically

across

other

connected

government

services.

Any

implementation

would

require

appropriate

legal

gateways

and

robust

privacy,

security

and

transparency

measures.

Consideration of further information Address
Being able to prove current address through the digital ID could be a more efficient and
easier

option

than

relying

on

physical

evidence,

such

as

council

tax

bills

and

bank

statements.

If

your

digital

ID

were

able

to

provide

an

authoritative

proof

of

your

current

address,

it

could

reduce

friction

and

save

you

the

burden

of

finding

recent

physical

documents

to

prove

this.

It

could

also

support

public

services

where

this

information

is

relevant.

However, it is unclear how cost effective it would be for us to provide authoritative
current

address

information

on

the

digital

ID,

and

the

extent

of

the

complexities

involved.

Existing

documents,

such

as

driving

licences,

‘verify’

address

by

sending

the

document

to

the

address

provided.

This

is

not

an

option

for

the

digital

ID

and,

as

such

it

is

difficult

to

be

confident

that

a

provided

address

is

accurate

and

in

use

for

example,
34

in circumstances where someone might move addresses often. Developing a way to
verify

current

address

information

to

a

sufficient

level

of

confidence

for

it

to

be

relied

upon

as

a

sole

proof

of

address

would

therefore

have

implications

on

the

cost

and

complexity

of

the

system.

We are interested in further understanding the ways that verified current address
information

could

be

used

and

how

the

government

could

verify

address

information

and

keep

it

up

to

date,

while

not

adding

an

extra

burden

on

people

who

face

exclusion.

Sex or gender information
In the UK, sex and gender data can cover three categories:
● Biological sex .
● Legal or certified sex . This is sex as recorded on your original birth certificate or
as

amended

under

the

Gender

Recognition

Act

2004.

In

almost

all

cases,

legal

or

certified

sex

reflects

a

person’s

biological

sex.

● Gender . A broad term that is sometimes used interchangeably with sex or when
specifically

referring

to

social

rather

than

biological

differences

between

sexes.

It

can

also

capture

data

that

equates

to

biological,

legal

or

certified

sex.

Information about sex and gender is not necessary for the intended purpose of the
digital

ID.

Inclusion

of

this

information

would

not

enhance

checks

that

the

digital

ID

belongs

to

the

person

presenting

it.

Checks

will

be

done

programmatically

and

through

biometric

authentication,

neither

of

which

require

specific

sex

or

gender

data.

Additionally, digital right to work checks and many checks in the private sector (including
Know

Your

Customer

(KYC)

and

simple

age

verification

checks)

do

not

require

the

collection

or

sharing

of

information

about

a

person’s

sex

or

gender.

Similarly,

access

to

most

public

services

does

not

require

this

information.

In

specific

scenarios

where

sex

or

gender

information

is

required,

it

is

better

collected

and

verified

by

other

means

appropriate

to

that

scenario,

rather

than

contained

in

the

digital

ID.

For these reasons, and in line with data minimisation principles, we do not intend to
include

sex

or

gender

information

in

the

digital

ID.

Keeping details up to date For the digital ID to be useful and trusted, it is important that the information it contains
remains

up

to

date.

Changes to an individual's core identity information, such as name
changes,

can

occur

for

legitimate

reasons

and

are

common.
We are exploring whether people should be legally required to inform the government,
within

a

suitable

timeframe,

of

any

errors

or

changes

to

personal

information

held

in

their

digital

ID,

so

that

it

can

be

updated,

and

what

an

appropriate

form

of

enforcement
35

could be. We are mindful that putting an obligation on users to keep their digital ID up to
date

may

be

unduly

burdensome

or

disproportionate,

especially

for

some

groups

with

protected

characteristics.

36

Questions about Chapter 3.1: Information contained in the digital ID
This question is for everyone:
3.1.Q1. The national digital ID will include a person’s full name, date of birth, nationality,
and

a biometric

facial

image (photo). What

further

information,

if

any,

should the

digital

ID

also include?

This question is for organisations3.1.Q2. The government is not planning to initially include address information on
the national digital

ID, but we

may review

this

position in

the

future. If

your organisation were to

rely

on this information, what

would

help

you

trust an

address

on

the

digital

ID?

This question is for everyone3.1.Q3. Businesses and organisations accepting the national digital ID need to trust that
the

information

on

it

is

up

to

date

and

accurate.

We

are

exploring

whether

people

with

a

digital

ID

should

be

legally

required

to

inform

the

government

within

an

appropriate

timeframe

of certain changes (such

as

a

name

change) or

errors

to

their

personal

information, so that their digital

ID can

be

updated.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with a legal requirement to inform the
government

of

changes

or

errors

within

an

appropriate

timeframe?

a. Strongly agree
b. Somewhat agree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
d. Somewhat disagree
e. Strongly disagree
f. Don’t know
i. 3.1.Q3.1. Please explain your answer

37

Chapter 3.2: Transforming public services
The national digital ID system is key to enabling streamlined, digital, lifelong public
service

provision.

To

be

clear:

access

to

public

services

will

not

be

made

dependent

on

having

the

digital

ID.

However,

should

people

choose

to

get

the

digital

ID,

it

will

be

possible

to

help

reduce

the

time

and

effort

they

spend

interacting

with

the

state

to

access

the

services

to

which

they

are

entitled.

This

is

because

identifying

ourselves

and

proving

our

entitlements

is

the

first

step

to

many

interactions

with

the

public

sector.

People will come into contact with public services many times over the course of a
lifetime.

Half

of

UK

adults

interact

with

government

administrative

services

around

once
a year, according to research from the Office for National Statistics. These interactions are likely to be more frequent for people who need additional support. At the same time,
people

who

need

additional

support

can

often

be

those

who

struggle

the

most

to

prove

their

identity

using

existing

forms

of

evidence,

like

passports

or

driving

licences

(as

outlined

in

Part

4

of

this

consultation,

on

being

inclusive).

Below are some examples of why someone might need to interact with a public service
and,

in

doing

so,

prove

who

they

are

or

their

entitlement

to

that

service.

From birth , a parent or guardian may need to engage with the state numerous times to
access

essential

services,

including

when:
● applying for a first passport ● checking a child’s eligibility for or applying for help with childcare costs ● adding a child element to a Universal Credit account ● accessing emergency housing or financial support
As a young person , someone may need to engage with the state to access services
such

as:
● proving a right to work for their first job ● applying for or proving eligibility for a student loan ● accessing inclusion and digital access support for people not in education,
employment

or

training

(NEET)

or

the

young

people’s

services

Throughout adult life , after the age of 18, someone may need to● access Universal Credit ● apply for or renew a full driving licence ● register a marriage ● register as homeless or in need of housing support
Later in life , someone may need to: ● claim a state pension ● apply for or check eligibility for winter fuel payments or warm home discount ● apply for an older person’s bus pass 38

● register a power of attorney
While proving identity is often the first step to accessing these services, in the UK this is
too

regularly

an

imperfect

and

inefficient

process

that

relies

on

people

finding

and

providing

the

right

combinations

of

physical

evidence.

Additionally,

because

different

government

departments

often

work

in

siloes,

people

can

feel

like

they

are

starting

from

scratch

each

time

they

interact

with

a

different

part

of

the

public

sector.

How digital ID can help We want public services to be easily accessible throughout a person’s life – whether
that

means

a

student

using

their

digital

ID

to

easily

access

services

for

themselves

or

a

parent

accessing

services

on

behalf

of

their

child.

Our

vision

is

to

make

people’s

interactions

with

the

state

as

efficient

and

useful

as

possible,

as

is

already

the

norm

in

areas

of

the

wider

economy,

such

as

in

online

banking,

and

in

other

countries.

Below is an example of how Estonia has personalised child benefit administration by
using

a

foundational

digital

identity

to

underpin

modernised

public

services.

This

example

is

included

for

reference

only

the

national

context

in

Estonia

varies

significantly

to

that

of

the

UK.

However,

it

still

provides

a

useful

illustration

of

what

a

national

digital

ID

system

could

make

possible.

Box 3.2.1: Case Study Streamlining Child Benefit Administration
When a child is born in Estonia, parents experience a seamless, digital-first system for
accessing

financial

support.

Using

their

digital

identity,

parents

register

the

birth

online

within

minutes.

Immediately

afterward,

a

tailored

benefits

offer

appears

in

their

government

account.

Parents

simply

review

and

accept

the

offer

no

additional

forms,

uploads,

or

supporting

documents

are

required.

Behind the scenes, eligibility checks continue automatically. Population and school
records

are

linked

to

ensure

that

payments

remain

accurate

and

up

to

date

until

the

child

turns

18.

Parents

or

guardians

only

need

to

report

major

changes,

such

as

a

new

address,

which

can

be

done

quickly

through

the

same

digital

portal.

Estonia’s example demonstrates how fully integrated, proactive digital services can
reduce

administrative

burden

for

people

while

ensuring

more

accurate

and

responsive

delivery

of

support.

This

stands

in

contrast

to

the

experience

people

currently

have

across

much

of

the

UK.

Parents,

carers

or

guardians

must

usually

determine

their

own

eligibility

via

guidance

found

on

GOV.UK,

navigate

multiple

and

sometimes

complex

application

routes

depending

on

their

specific

situation,

and

gather

physical

documents

to

evidence

their

claims.

If

their

circumstances

change,

they

often

need

to

revisit

this

process

from

the

beginning

rechecking

eligibility,

resubmitting

documents,

and

repeating

applications

to

different

schemes.

39

Digital ID as the foundation of transformed public services This government is committed to bringing public services into the twenty-first century.
The

digital

ID

system

will

be

the

cornerstone

of

this

transformation

learning

from

successful

systems

around

the

world

while

keeping

the

UK

government’s

values

of

privacy,

transparency

and

inclusion

front

and

centre.

We

expect

the

digital

ID

will

help

us

to:

● remove persisting barriers to public services, like ID exclusion (see Part 4 on how
the

digital

ID

system

will

be

inclusive)
● speed up service delivery by further eliminating repetitive and inefficient
identification

processes

● save taxpayers’ money and lower costs to government by reducing reliance on
paper-based

identity

documents,

which

can

be

more

easily

faked

● give people more control over how they interact with public services and how
they

prove

their

identity

and

eligibility

From the outset, the digital ID system will offer people a secure, inclusive and reusable
credential

that

can

be

used

across

the

public

sector

to

prove

their

identity

the

first

step

for

proving

eligibility

for

many

public

services.

This

will

build

on

work

that

GOV.UK

One

Login

is

already

doing

to

reduce

duplication

of

identity

processes

across

government.

While

applying

for

and

using

the

digital

ID

will

not

be

required

to

access

public

services,

in

time,

we

expect

it

will

reduce

reliance

on

physical

documents

as

people

choose

to

adopt

it,

while

making

processes

easier

and

quicker

than

they

are

today.

In time, the digital ID system will also help enable modern, personalised and joined-up
public

services.

A

trusted

digital

identity

will

provide

the

foundation

for

government

to

deliver

the

services

they

need

more

quickly

and

effectively

without

creating

a

single

database

of

all

government

data

about

a

person.

Instead,

this

will

support

public

services

to

match

and

verify

existing

information

about

the

people

they

serve

in

responsible,

privacy-enhancing

ways

such

as

via

a

universal

unique

identifier

(or

similar

approach).

This

means

public

services

could

better

work

for

individuals,

when

they

need

them

and

in

ways

that

work

for

them,

letting

government

move

away

from

old-fashioned

and

bureaucratic

processes,

towards

proactive,

hassle-free

services

that

are

available

at

the

point

of

need.

How this will look and feel will evolve over the coming years, as we hear from people
throughout

the

consultation

and

beyond.

It

will

take

time

to

fix

the

foundations

of

the

digital

state.

However,

below

are

three

illustrative

examples

of

how

we

envisage

the

digital

ID

system

could

help

transform

public

services:

● Enabling inclusion. The digital ID system will reduce existing, systemic barriers
to

accessing

public

services.

A

free

to

access,

digitally

verifiable

credential

will

help

address

traditional

identity

documents

being

financially

or

otherwise

out

of
40

reach for many people. For example, it will give people who do not already have
one

an

authoritative

proof

of

identity

when

applying

for

funded

childcare

schemes.

This

will

help

ensure

people

can

access

the

services

to

which

they

are

entitled

● Saving people time. The digital ID system could also help ensure that people no
longer

waste

time

proving

to

public

sector

organisations

who

they

are

or

chasing

the

support

they

need.

For

instance,

by

underpinning

a

way

to

consistently

reference

people

across

government

services,

it

could

enable

more

proactive

and

personalised

public

service

delivery.

In

the

future,

integration

with

national

and

local

services

could

fundamentally

reshape

the

interaction

with

individuals

and

communities,

with

a

shift

from

impersonal

processes

to

outcomes

that

meet

the

specific

needs

of

individuals

● Reducing fraud . The digital ID system will lessen our reliance on insecure
physical

forms

of

evidence.

When

a

service

needs

to

verify

something

about

a

person,

their

devices

will

perform

a

secure

digital

‘handshake’

using

trusted

technical

standards.

This

will

mean fewer

photocopies

of

documents

being

stored

or

shared

insecurely

and

safer

interactions

for

people

and

the

organisations

they

interact

with.

This

will

make

it

harder

for

criminals

to

exploit

weaknesses,

whether

that

be

using

fake

documents

or

impersonating

someone.

This

could

free

up

government

resources

for

inspecting

other

access

routes

more

thoroughly

We recognise that these potential outcomes cannot be achieved without the support
and

cooperation

of

devolved

governments,

local

authorities

and

other

delivery

partners

who

understand

issues

people

face

at

the

grassroot

level.

We

are

committed

to

working

closely

with

these

groups

to

help

ensure

that

the

benefits

of

the

digital

ID

system

are

realised

similarly

across

the

length

and

breadth

of

the

country.

41

Questions about Chapter 3.2: Transforming public services
These questions are for everyone:
3.2.Q1: We know that people can struggle to access or claim the public services to
which

they

are

entitled.

We

want

to

identify

key issues in

these

interactions,

so

that

we

can

explore

how

the

digital

ID system could

help

address

these,

making

people’s

lives

easier. When

people

are

interacting

with

public

services,

some

common issues

could

be:

Signposting – people might not know what public services are available to them

Privacy concerns – people might be concerned about who information about
their

situation will

be

shared with

Time and effort – people might not find the time to complete the processes
needed

to

access

public

services

they

are

entitled

to

Proving their identity/eligibility – people might not have access to the required
letters,

documents,

or

reference

numbers

needed

to

check

their

eligibility for, or to, access

public

services

Are there examples of any barriers or inefficiencies that prevent you (or people you
support) from interacting

with

public

services, that

you

think

the

digital

ID system could help with?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 3.2.Q1.1. Please explain your answer
3.2.Q2: Have you ever faced issues with knowing which public services are
available to you based

on

your

circumstances or,

if

you

support other

people,

have

you faced

similar

issues when

supporting

them?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 3.2.Q2.1. If YES, please explain your answer

42

3.2.Q3: Have you ever been unable to or had difficulty accessing a public service
because

you

were

unable

to

prove

your

identity or,

if

you

support

other

people,

have

you

faced

similar

issues

when

supporting

them?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 3.2.Q3.1. Please explain your answer
3.2.Q4. For those who opt for a digital ID, government would develop a
method to securely identify

and match people across different public

services to

simplify

everyday

interactions

between

individuals

and

the

state.

For instance, such an approach could help ensure changes in an individual’s
information

are easily

and

quickly reflected

across

services,

like

a

name

change.

This

would

reduce the

need

for

people

to

update

their

information

separately

for

each

service. It

could

also let

government

move

away

from

old-fashioned

and

bureaucratic

processes,

towards

proactive,

hassle-free

services

that

are

available

at

the

point

of

need.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the adoption of such an approach
to public

sector

transformation?

a. Strongly agree
b. Somewhat agree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
d. Somewhat disagree
e. Strongly disagree
f. Don’t know
i. 3.2.Q4.1. Please explain your answer
3.2.Q5. What ethical issues, if any, can you think of when designing a way
to identify and

match people

across

services?

This question is for experts speaking in their own capacity and organisations3.2.Q6. What technical issues do we need to think about when designing a way
to correctly identify and

match people across public services?

43

Chapter 3.3: Utility in the wider economy
While the national digital ID will not completely remove the need for individuals to collate
other

evidence

and

paperwork

in

some

transactions,

an

inclusive,

purpose-built

and

privacy-centric

credential

has

the

potential

to

revolutionise

how

people

prove

things

about

themselves

in

their

daily

lives.

In areas without specific regulatory requirements, there are unlikely to be inherent
barriers

to

the

use

and

acceptance

of

the

digital

ID.

This

includes

situations

such

as

proving

who

you

are

when

collecting

parcels

or

joining

a

gym.

This

means

the

digital

ID

could

be

useful

for

people

in

the

short

term

across

a

range

of

different

scenarios.

Across the economy, there are many other transactions where regulatory or other
requirements

mean

an

individual

must

present

proof

of

identity

or

eligibility.

This

includes

regular

experiences,

like

buying

a

bottle

of

wine

or

visiting

age-restricted

websites,

to

more

significant

and

infrequent

occurrences

like

getting

a

mortgage.

Diagram 3.3.1 – Indicative age and identity use cases in the private sector where
the

digital

ID

could

be

acceptable

For the digital ID to be trusted and accepted across the economy, we will need to
remove

barriers

to

its

use

and

create

a

framework

of

safeguards

and

operational

requirements.

Work

is

already

underway

to

deliver

many

of

the

necessary

changes

in

44

regulated sectors, so that a digital verification service (DVS) can be used safely and
securely,

alongside

physical

documents.

This

includes:

● Ofcom has listed digital identity services as a potentially highly effective method of age assurance, with DVS certification one way to provide evidence of compliance ● the Home Office will update the alcohol mandatory licensing conditions to allow
for

age

verification

using

registered

DVS

when

buying

alcohol
● the Tobacco and Vapes Bill will provide a regulation-making power, which will
enable

specific

provision

to

be

made

to

make

clear

how

DVS

can

be

used

securely

for

tobacco

and

vape

sales
● the Home Office intends to follow the same approach of providing a
regulation-making

power

in

the

Crime

and

Policing

Bill,

to

make

clear

how

DVS

can

be

used

securely

for

the

sale

of

knives

and

other

bladed

articles
● DSIT has worked with HM Treasury to jointly produce guidance on using digital identities for identity and Know Your Customer checks as required under the Money Laundering Regulations
As we expect the GOV.UK Wallet (which will hold the digital ID) to be certified as a DVS
under

the

Data

(Use

and

Access)

Act

2025,

these

changes

could

pave

the

way

for

people

to

choose

to

use

the

digital

ID

across

the

economy.

For

instance,

the

digital

ID

could

support

the

use

of

trustworthy

electronic

signatures,

providing

a

way

for

people

to

prove

their

identity

before

digitally

signing

a

document

in

the

homebuying

process.

These changes will also unlock opportunities for people to use other certified DVS
providers

and

documents

in

the

GOV.UK

Wallet

should

they

wish.

Government

remains

committed

to

the

work

that

is

already

ongoing

to

enable

the

use

of

digital

verification

services

in

a

range

of

further

scenarios,

and

to

encourage

the

use

of

DVS

for

digital

right

to

rent

checks

and

Disclosure

and

Barring

Service

identity

checks

by

those

who

would

like

to

conduct

a

check

digitally.

The government has also recently launched an evidence-led consultation on how to ensure children’s experiences online are safe and enriching. The consultation asks
about

how

children

use

digital

technology,

as

well

as

potential

new

measures

for

keeping

them

safe

online,

and

will

be

open

until

26

May

2026.

It

includes

questions

about

how

age

verification

technologies,

like

the

national

digital

ID,

could

support

effective

implementation

of

current

and

future

protections.

Where appropriate, we are working across government and with regulators to ensure
that

where

any

digital

identity,

including

the

national

digital

ID,

is

accepted,

it

is

done

in

a

robust

way

for

instance

with

sector

specific

regulatory

and

legislative

requirements

for

programmatic

checking

(see

chapter

2.2).

This

is

intended

to

prevent

organisations

from

relying

on

insecure

visual

inspection

methods.

45

In some cases, the relevant legislation, regulation or guidance which is necessary to
enable

acceptance

of

the

digital

ID

may

be

devolved.

We

will

work

closely

with

the

devolved

governments

and

seek

to

secure

legislative

consent

as

necessary

so

that

people

across

the

UK

can

make

the

same

choices

about

whether

to

use

their

digital

ID

in

their

daily

lives.

Across all uses, the digital ID will be optional. It will give people more choice for how
they

operate

in

the

economy

and

share

their

data,

rather

than

becoming

the

only

choice.

46

Questions about Chapter 3.3: Utility in the wider economy
This question is for everyone:
3.3.Q1. The national digital ID would be useable across the private and public sectors,
alongside

other

options

like

physical

documents

and

other

appropriate

digital

identities

from

third

parties.

To what extent do you agree or disagree that the private sector and third
parties should be

able

to

use the digital

ID

alongside

other

options?

a. Strongly agree
b. Somewhat agree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
d. Somewhat disagree
e. Strongly disagree
f. Don’t know
i. 3.3.Q1.1. Please explain your answer

47

Chapter 3.4: Tackling illegal working
As part of the digital ID system, we are exploring changes to how right to work checks
are

conducted

in

the

UK

to

more

effectively

tackle

illegal

working.

Under

UK

legislation,

access

to

work

is

reserved

for

those

with

a

right

to

work.

This

includes

British

and

Irish

nationals,

and

those

whose

immigration

status

entitles

them

to

work.

All

employers

in

the

UK

already

have

a

responsibility

to

prevent

illegal

working

by

those

individuals

who

are

not

entitled

to

do

so.

An employer can check someone’s right to work by conducting prescribed checks
before

employing

someone.

The

checks

apply

irrespective

of

nationality

and

include

British

and

Irish

citizens.

Conducting

these

checks

ensures

an

individual

is

not

disqualified

from

carrying

out

the

work

in

question

by

reason

of

their

immigration

status.

It

also

ensures

businesses

can

obtain

a

statutory

excuse

(a

defence)

against

liability

for
a civil penalty where illegal working is detected.
There are currently three main ways a business can complete a right to work check:
● A manual check of original documents from a prescribed list of accepted documents (all citizens) ● A digital check using a digital verification service (DVS) that offers Identity
Document

Validation

Technology

(valid

British

passport

and

Irish

passport

or

Irish

passport

card

holders

only)

● A Home Office online check (non-British and non-Irish citizens with an eVisa only)
How right to work checks could change Our ambition is that digital right to work checks will be mandatory by the end of this
Parliament

for

the

purpose

of

obtaining

a

statutory

excuse.

The

evidence

which

can

be

checked

by

a

robust

digital

process

will

include

the

digital

ID

(including

any

alternative

access

solutions),

alongside

a

British/Irish

passport

(or

Irish

passport

card)

or

an

eVisa.

We are therefore proposing to legislate so that evidence must be checked digitally as
part

of

a

prescribed

right

to

work

check.

Amendments

will

be

made

to

the

secondary

legislation

and

statutory

codes

of

practice

to

prescribe

robust

digital

checks

as

the

only

acceptable

means

by

which

the

above

evidence

can

be

checked

and

the

statutory

excuse

obtained.

We

will

also

remove

alternative

forms

of

evidence

deemed

no

longer

valid

to

establish

a

statutory

excuse,

such

as

birth

certificates,

and

set

out

within

the

code

of

practice

how

businesses

can

conduct

digital

checks

using

the

narrowed

range

of

evidence

including

via

an

appropriate

DVS.

48

The move to only digital checks will● make it easier for people to demonstrate their right to work by not having to find
and

potentially

post

original

physical

documents

to

prove

their

identity
● make unreliable manual checks of varied paper documents unacceptable,
making

it

harder

for

criminals

to

use

forged

documents

to

gain

employment

and

helping

to

mitigate

fraud
● reduce the risk of people’s data being misplaced or leaked by replacing copies of
paper-based

documents

with

secure

digital

checks
● create a digital audit trail of where checks have been carried out, helping
businesses

to

demonstrate

compliance

and

supporting

enforcement
● minimise the data people share with businesses for right to work checks ● make it simpler and quicker for businesses to conduct checks, and therefore
comply

with

government

requirements,

by

standardising

the

process
● increase the accuracy of checks through automated validity checking and
minimising

the

potential

for

human

error
We recognise that some right to work checks may still need to be carried out via an
exceptions

handling

process.

This

will

be

set

out

in

the

statutory

codes

of

practice.

Business support All businesses recruiting from the date of implementation of these changes will need to
carry

out

a

digital

right

to

work

check

for

new

workers

to

obtain

a

statutory

excuse

against

a

civil

penalty.

This

means

that

there

will

be

no

need

to

retrospectively

carry

out

right

to

work

checks

for

workers

already

in

post.

The government is committed to ensuring that businesses are supported in the
transition

to

digital

right

to

work

checks.

We

will

therefore

be

implementing:

● a transition period between the introduction of the digital ID for individuals and
mandating

digital

right

to

work

checks

to

obtain

a

statutory

excuse
● a communications campaign and business engagement ● business training to support the move to exclusively digital checks
As set out in Chapter 2.2, we are also considering whether the government should
make

available

a

free

or

low-cost

checker

service,

known

as

the

‘Government

Checker’,

to

support

checks

of

the

digital

ID.

49

Questions about Chapter 3.4: Tackling illegal working
As a reminder: please do not include information that could identify a specific individual
in

any

free

text

responses.

These questions are for everyone3.4.Q1. Are there any additional challenges not captured in the
consultation that businesses would

face

in

carrying

out

fully

digital

right

to

work

checks

for

all

new

workers?

a. Yes
b. No
i. 3.4.Q1.1. Please explain your answer
3.4.Q2. Would any additional support not captured in the consultation be required for
business

to

comply

with

fully

digital

right

to

work

checks?

a. Yes
b. No
i. 3.4.Q2.1. Please explain your answer
This question is for organisations:
3.4.Q3. What information would your organisation require to have confidence that
a digital

right

to

work check

has

been

completed?

a. Date of completion
b. Length of right to work
c. Condition of working
i. 3.4.Q3.1. Any other information not listed above. Please provide details.

50

Part 4Inclusive

Introduction
The national digital ID system provides an opportunity for government to accelerate its
mission

towards

a

digitally

inclusive

UK,

and

ensure

that

everyone

can

participate

in,

and

benefit

from,

a

modern

digital

society

and

economy.

Inclusion

will

therefore

be

at

the

heart

of

how

we

design

and

deliver

this

system

to

the

public,

and

how

we

support

individuals

who

struggle

to

prove

their

identity

or

engage

with

digital

services.

Inclusion and security measures will be developed in tandem from the outset. See
chapter

5.2.

on

security

for

more

detail

on

keeping

the

digital

ID

system

secure.

Chapter 4.1: Eligibility for the digital ID
All British and Irish citizens, and foreign nationals with permission to be in the UK, who
are

above

an

agreed

minimum

age,

will

be

eligible

for

the

digital

ID.

Minimum age for eligibility We plan to make the digital ID available for those who meet the above criteria and are
aged

16

or

older.

This

is

because

Right

to

Work

checks

are

required

from

age

16.

However,

we

want

to

gather

views

on

either:

● lowering the minimum age of eligibility to 13, or ● removing a minimum age so that everyone can have the digital ID from birth
Such changes have advantages and disadvantages, and we invite views to inform a
final

decision.

Regardless

of

the

minimum

age

chosen,

the

Age

Appropriate

Design

Code

(AADC)

and

its

principles

will

apply

to

all

children

using

the

digital

ID,

even

16-

and

17-year-olds.

Appropriate

parental

supervision

mechanisms

will

also

need

to

be

designed

to

be

proportional

to

the

risks

and

benefits

to

the

child.

Lowering the minimum age of eligibility to 13
There are currently relatively few occasions when children aged 13-15 are required to
prove

their

age

or

identity.

Accessing

online

platforms,

including

social

media

platforms,

51

is an important exception, as the legal age from which people in the UK can provide
consent

to

the

processing

of

their

personal

data

for

most

online

services

is

13.

As

a

result

of

this,

m
any

online

services

have

a

minimum

age

of

access

of

13.

Additionally,

the

Online

Safety

Act

2023

requires

in-scope

services

that

do

not

prohibit

certain

types

of

content

harmful

to

children,

including

pornography

and

suicide

content,

to

use

highly

effective

age

assurance

to

prevent

children

from

encountering

it.

Some online services use certified DVS providers as a method of age assurance. This
allows

children

aged

13

or

over

to

use

their

services

if

they

can

sufficiently

verify

their

identity

with

a

DVS.

However,

any

child

that

does

not

have

access

to

enough

evidence

of

their

identity,

like

a

passport,

to

allow

online

services

to

be

confident

in

their

age,

will

be

unable

to

benefit

from

these

services

and

may

be

prevented

from

accessing

age-appropriate

online

content.

Making the digital ID available for those aged 13 and over could help address these
inclusion

concerns

by

being

free

for

children

to

access

and

use.

It

could

help

services

to

accurately

distinguish

a

child’s

age

or

age

group

between

13-17

and

thereby

deliver

more

tailored

and

age-appropriate

experiences.

We

do

not

propose

mandating

the

digital

ID

as

the

only

way

to

prove

your

age

or

age

range

on

online

services

and

we

will

continue

to

support

innovation

and

user

choice

in

age

assurance

technologies.

Further, making the digital ID available to additional age groups may bring some public
service

benefits.

Parents

and

guardians

typically

need

to

register

and

manage

access

to

services

on

the

child’s

behalf.

The

more

complex

the

child’s

individual

circumstances,

the

more

frequently

their

parent

or

caregiver

may

need

to

provide

this

same

information

to

a

variety

of

services.

Broadening

access

to

more

age

bands

may

help

to

reduce

this

administrative

burden

on

more

parents,

and

support

more

efficient

public

services.

However, lowering the minimum age to 13 would also bring unique privacy, inclusion
and

design

challenges

as

children’s

personal

data

must

be

afforded

the

right

levels

of

protection.

Younger

teenagers

are

also

more

likely

to

require

accessible

language

and

inclusive

parental

supervision

mechanisms.

Additionally,

explicit

parental

or

guardian

consent

may

be

necessary

for

anyone

under

16

to

access

the

digital

ID,

or

it

may

need

to

be

managed

entirely

by

a

parent/guardian

on

a

child’s

behalf.

Providing everyone with the ability to have a digital ID from birth
Enabling people to participate in the digital ID system from birth could support
streamlined,

digital,

lifelong

public

service

provision.

Enabling

parents

and

guardians

to

prove

information

about

their

children

digitally

from

birth

would

mean

that

parents

or

guardians

of

younger

children

could

have

the

same

benefits

as

those

of

older

children.

52

Parents or guardians would be able to decide whether to obtain a digital ID for their
child.

We

also

recognise

that

children

under

the

age

of

13

would

not

be

able

to

manage

their

own

digital

ID.

Instead,

this

would

be

done

by

a

parent

or

guardian.

We further recognise that removing a minimum age for digital ID eligibility would raise
additional

challenges

compared

to

having

a

minimum

age

of

13

or

16.

This

includes

additional

privacy

issues,

and

issues

around

how

parental

management

of

the

digital

ID

would

work

in

specific

instances,

such

as

where

parents

are

separated.

We

also

need

to

understand

whether

children

would

be

placed

at

a

disadvantage

if

their

parent

or

caregiver

decided

not

to

obtain

a

digital

ID

on

their

behalf,

and

if

this

would

create

new

safeguarding,

exclusion

or

other

risks.

53

Questions about Chapter 4.1: Eligibility for the digital ID
These questions are for everyone:
4.1.Q1. All British and Irish citizens, and foreign nationals with permission to be in the
UK,

who

are

above

an

agreed

minimum

age

will

be

eligible

for

the national digital

ID.

Are

there

any other groups

that

should

be

included?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 4.1.Q1.1 Please list which groups you believe should be included, and
why

4.1.Q2. Which of the following ages do you think is most suitable to access the digital
ID system from?

a. 16 years old
b. 13 years old
c. Birth
d. Other
e. Don’t know
i. 4.1.Q2.1. Please explain your answer

54

Chapter 4.2 Unlocking access across society
It is our intention that the national digital ID system enables every eligible individual to
engage

with

the

many

benefits

of

this

technology,

and

the

resulting

improvements

in

greater

ID

(identity

document)

ownership

and

increased

digital

inclusion.

Both

ID

and

digital

exclusion

are

tackled

in

turn

below.

Traditional identity document exclusion ID exclusion is a persistent issue in the UK. In 2021, the Cabinet Office found that 1 in 10 eligible voters in England, Scotland and Wales did not hold an in-date and
recognisable

form

of

photo

ID.

Due

to

a

combination

of

financial,

practical

and

other

barriers,

many

people

struggle

to

access

identity

documents

like

passports

or

driving

licenses,

which

are

commonly

used

as

proof

or

evidence

of

identity.

For

instance,

an

adult

British

passport

is

priced

between

£94.50

and

£107,

depending

on

the

application

route,

which

can

place

them

out

of

reach

for

low-income

individuals.

In

addition,

some

applicants

for

existing

government

IDs

may

struggle

to

obtain

supporting

evidence,

such

as

birth

or

adoption

certificates,

or

access

to

a

counter

signatory

required

to

successfully

navigate

application

processes.

An

individual’s

level

of

trust

in

government

can

also

affect

whether

they

choose

to

engage

with

formal

identity

systems

in

the

first

place.

Those without the ability to prove identity to the required standard are at a disadvantage
when

it

comes

to

engaging

with

government

and

wider

services,

whether

online

or

offline.

In

the

most

extreme

cases,

this

may

mean

that

people

can

struggle

to

open

a

bank

account,

buy

or

rent

a

home,

or

prove

their

right

to

work

status.

The digital ID system offers a unique opportunity to support these people. It will allow
them

to

access

a

free

(i.e.

without

up-front

charges

for

use

and

access)

digital

ID

that

could

transform

their

ability

to

engage

with

relevant

services

and

level

the

playing

field

for

those

currently

experiencing

disadvantage.

It

is

our

intention

that

the

digital

ID

system

enables

every

eligible

individual

to

engage

with

modernised

digital

services

across

government.

More

details

can

be

found

in

Part

3

on

how

the

digital

ID

system

will

be

useful.

Digital inclusion The digital ID system will also be rolled out with a core focus on digital inclusion. Many
people

lack

the

access,

skills,

support

and

confidence

to

participate

in

and

benefit

from

our

modern

digital

society.

Addressing

this

will

be

critical

to

their

ability

to

use

the

digital

ID.

For

example:

● The Lloyds Consumer Digital Index Report finds 1.6 million people in the UK are living offline, meaning they do not use the internet at all
55

● The Lloyds Essential Digital Skills report finds 8% of UK adults (approx. 4 million people) do not have the essential digital skills needed for everyday life ● Age UK research finds 37% of those aged over 65 who want to be online more, do not trust the internet ● Ofcom’s technology tracker finds 6% of UK households do not have a smartphone
Groups requiring targeted support Our inclusion work will focus on supporting a variety of different groups. Below is a
non
-
exhaustive

list

of

those

who

may

benefit

most

from

additional

support

measures

to

ensure

they

are

able

to

access

the

digital

ID,

and

a

range

of

challenges

that

could

limit

individuals’

ability

to

access

it:

● those on a low income, who may face data or device poverty ● people who have legally migrated to the UK but struggle to prove their right to be
here

(people

without

foundational

documents,

like

birth

certificates

or

passports,

or

expired

documents),

such

as

older

Commonwealth

citizens

and

the

Windrush

Generation
● those with no or poor internet connectivity, or incompatible or outdated tech ● people lacking essential digital skills ● people with low motivation or confidence to use digital technologies, which may
be

due

to

lack

of

skills

and

knowledge
● those lacking support networks to access available technology ● people experiencing unemployment ● people living with physical and cognitive disabilities ● people who are neurodivergent ● older people ● children and young people, including those Not in Education, Employment or
Training

(‘NEET’),

including

vulnerable

young

people

and

those

in

care
● care leavers ● survivors of, or those currently experiencing, domestic abuse ● people with limited English ● people who do not have a fixed or stable address, or experience homelessness ● people affected by human trafficking or modern slavery ● sex workers ● people in refuges or safe houses, witness protection, or with confidentiality or
non-disclosure

orders
● trans and non-binary people and anyone with recent name changes and
mismatched

records.

This

should

be

read

alongside

Part

3

which

includes

a

section

on

sex

and

gender

56

● groups that facial biometric systems may not reliably recognise, for example
people

who

live

with

facial

differences

or

people

who

have

undergone

facial

surgery
● people in prison, recently released or on probation ● in-patients in hospitals or secure mental health units and care homes ● cultural communities with less engagement in mainstream society, including
some

religious

and

traveller

communities
● people with concerns about data use, security and data privacy, who are
reluctant

to

engage,

or

do

not

trust

digital

products

or

government

services.

This

chapter

should

be

read

alongside

chapter

5.1

on

data

protection

and

privacy

57

Questions about Chapter 4.2: Unlocking access across society
These questions are for everyone:
We are committing to an inclusion programme to ensure everyone eligible in the UK can
access

the

digital

ID.

4.2.Q1. Some people may face barriers to creating or using the national digital ID. This
may

be

due

to difficulty

accessing

traditional

proofs

of

identity

(like

passports)

or

due

to

a

lack

of digital access,

skills or confidence.

Are you aware of any other barriers not captured in the consultation?
a. Yes b. No c. Don’t know i. 4.2.Q1.1 Which other barriers are you aware of and why? 4.2.Q2. The government is committed to making sure the national digital ID system stays true to the approach outlined in the Digital Inclusion Action Plan. This includes providing local level support, increasing access to the internet and helping
people

develop

digital

skills.

Is there any particular support not captured in the consultation or the Digital Inclusion
Action

Plan that

would

help

you or

other

people to

use

the

national

digital

ID?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 4.2.Q2.1 Which other forms of support would be helpful and why?
4.2.Q3. Chapter 4.2 of the consultation includes a non-exhaustive list of those
people who

may

benefit

the

most

from

additional

support

measures

to

ensure

they

are

able

to

access

the

national

digital

ID.

Are there any groups not included in the list that you believe could also be at risk of ID or
digital exclusion?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
58

i. 4.2.Q3.1. Please specify which other groups may be excluded and
describe

how

they

might

be impacted. Please

do

this

for

each

group

you identify.

Chapter 4.3 Commitment to supporting inclusion
Practical onboarding support Some individuals will require specific support to create and use the digital ID, and we
will

ensure

that

measures

are

in

place

to

help

them

do

this.

Support for onboarding and ongoing use of the digital ID could include● dedicated and locally accessible assistance ● support and training from trusted individuals ● guidance and programmes designed to inform and disseminate skills An example of this is HM Passport Office, part of the Home Office, which provides
additional

support

to

those

who

struggle

to

apply

for

a

passport.

This

includes

commercial

in-person

routes

in

local

communities

to

check

documents

and

ensure

the

correct

information

is

provided.

Telephone

support

for

disabled

and

digitally

excluded

customers

is

also

provided

to

facilitate

the

correct

completion

of

application

forms.

HM

Passport

Office

also

integrates

safeguarding

measures

for

vulnerable

applicants,

ensuring

sensitive

handling

of

personal

circumstances

such

as

disability.

We

will

ensure

that

support

is

in

place

to

ensure

all

eligible

individuals

can

access

the

digital

ID

if

they

wish

to.

Digital inclusion support It will be critical that those who require digital support are able to access the digital ID system. The Digital Inclusion Action Plan sets out the steps that government is taking to improve digital skills and help more people access the benefits of technology and online
services.

Some

examples

include:

● identifying what works and designing evidence-based interventions ● taking a cross-government approach to breaking down silos ● delivering in partnership with local authorities, national and devolved
governments,

and

private

and

third

sectors
● learning from international partners and following best practice
Government will continue to deliver targeted digital inclusion activity to assist those who
are

digitally

excluded,

including

providing

support

to

access

the

digital

ID.

59

Questions about Chapter 4.3: Commitment to supporting inclusion
This question is for members of the public:
4.3.Q1. What kind of support should be made available to people who do not have a
digital

device

(like

a

smartphone

or

tablet) to

enable

them

to

create

and

access

the

digital

ID?

a. Dedicated and locally accessible help
b. Support and training from trusted individuals
c. Guidance and programmes designed to inform and disseminate skills
d. Other. Please provide details.
This question is for experts responding in their own capacity and organisations:
4.3.Q2. We are considering dedicated accessible support for those who are digitally
excluded,

delivered locally,

in-person

and

by

trusted

organisations. Are

there

any

other ways you

think

the

government

should

consider supporting

those

who

are

digitally

excluded?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 4.3.Q2.1. Please explain what you support measures should be
considered

60

Chapter 4.4 Accessibility
The national digital ID will follow an inclusive by design approach. This means that we
will

aim

to:

● anticipate and remove barriers to accessibility ● design features with diverse users in mind ● extensively test features before roll-out ● ensure a good experience for all users regardless of their ability or the age or
model

of

their

device

The system will comply with recognised accessibility standards like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 AA standards. The system will also comply with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2)) Accessibility Regulations 2018, which set out standards specifically for public sector bodies to ensure their websites and mobile applications are accessible. It will also aim to be fully
operable

using

common

assistive

technologies,

including:

● screen readers ● keyboard-only navigation ● voice commands ● biometric authentication ● screen magnification
Accessibility will be an ongoing and collaborative effort, and we will adapt our approach
as

new

opportunities

for

accessibility

are

identified

and

technological

needs

evolve.

61

Questions about Chapter 4.4: Accessibility
This question is for everyone:
4.4.Q1. The government intends to engage with a range of people and organisations
outside

of

government to help ensure

the

design

and

delivery

of

the

national

digital

ID system is accessible. Can

you

suggest

any specific

organisations or

types of organisations which the

government should engage

with?

62

Chapter 4.5: Alternative access routes
We recognise that some groups of people may significantly benefit from alternative
routes

and

additional

support

to

access

and

use

their

national

digital

ID.

The

standard

route,

as

set

out

in

Part

2,

will

require

a

device,

such

as

a

compatible

smartphone

or

tablet,

and

connectivity.

We are considering whether alternative routes to accessing the digital ID will be
needed,

to

ensure

that

all

eligible

individuals

can

access

the

system.

Any

alternative

route

would

facilitate

a

digitised

check

to

ensure

that

the

alternative

route

is

as

robust

as

the

standard

route

in

terms

of

security,

reliability,

accuracy

and

the

prevention

of

fraud.

This

means

that

a

physical

card

that

is

only

visually

checkable

cannot

be

an

alternative.

Below are examples of how other countries have approached an alternative but
digitised

access

route

to

their

respective

systems.

These

international

examples

are

included

for

reference

only

and

the

national

contexts

within

which

they

have

been

designed

are

likely

to

vary

significantly

to

those

in

the

UK.

They

provide

examples

of

technologies

that

can

facilitate

a

digitised

check

without

requiring

a

device

or

data

connectivity.

International case studies● Denmark’s MitID: MitID is predominantly accessed via the MitID app, but
alternative

access

routes

include

a

code

display.

This

is

a

physical

product

which

displays

a

one-time

passcode

for

users

to

safely

log

in

to

a

web

browser.

More
information is available on the MitID website
● India’s Aadhaar: India’s digital ID system includes a smartphone app alongside
alternative

access

routes.

These

alternative

routes

include

digitally

signed

QR

codes,

which

can

be

scanned

for

offline

identity
verification. More information is available on the Aadhaar Website
● Estonia’s E-ID: The foundation of this scheme is a physical ID card with a smart
chip

for

digital

authentication.

The

e-ID

system

also

includes

a

smartphone

app.

As

an

alternative

access

route,

Mobile-ID

offers

secure

digital

authentication

and

signatures

via

a

special

SIM

card,

enabling

access

to

e-services

without

a

card
reader. More information is available on the e-ID website

63

Questions about Chapter 4.5: Alternative access routes
This question is for everyone:
4.5.Q1. We are exploring alternative ways to access the national digital ID for those who
cannot

use

a device.

What do

you

think

are

the

most

important barriers for

government

to address when designing alternative access routes for

the

national

digital

ID?

This question is for members of the public4.5.Q2. If you are someone who does not use a digital device, what would you want
from

an

alternative

access

route?

64

Part 5Trusted

Introduction
It is essential to the success of the national digital ID system that government upholds
the

highest

standards

of

security,

privacy

and

data

protection,

with

effective

and

proportionate

governance

and

oversight.

Individuals

must

have

full

confidence

that

the

government

is

looking

after

their

data,

keeping

it

safe

from

unauthorised

disclosure,

fraud,

cyber-attacks

and

other

threats.

Similarly,

those

who

need

to

rely

on

information

in

the

digital

ID,

from

government

services

to

private

businesses,

must

be

able

to

trust

its

accuracy

and

validity.

Principles

of

data

minimisation

and

empowering

users

to

ensure

they

have

greater

control

over

how

much

data

they

share

when

using

their

digital

ID

at

point

of

use

will

be

central

to

the

system’s

design

and

implementation.

Chapter 5.1: Data protection and privacy
The digital ID system will be designed and delivered with privacy at its core. The UK has
strong

data

protection

legislation,

and

robust

legal

requirements

and

principles

of

data

protection

and

privacy

by

design

will

be

embedded

throughout

every

stage

of

development

and

delivery

of

the

new

system.

Data

protection

legislation

means

the

UK

GDPR,

the

Data

Protection

Act

2018

and

any

regulations

made

under

them.

Other

relevant

legislation

includes

the

Privacy

and

Electronic

Communication

Regulations

2003

and

the

Human

Rights

Act

1998.

This

legislative

environment

provides

strong

guardrails

for

how

the

digital

ID

system

can

be

implemented

and

used,

and

the

design

and

delivery

will

not

deviate

from

established

legal

requirements.

Building on existing progress The government already processes personal data for identity purposes, including via
GOV.UK

One

Login,

GOV.UK

Wallet,

the

eVisa

service

and

HM

Passport

Office.

These

services

are

safe,

secure

and

designed

with

privacy

in

mind,

and

the

new

system

will

build

on

these

well

established

and

robust

foundations

to

deliver

a

solution

that

is

designed

to

the

highest

standards

of

privacy,

security

and

trust.

65

Data protection by design is embedded into these systems and strong governance
arrangements

ensure

that

data

protection

compliance

is

integral

to

their

operation.

For

instance,

GOV.UK

One

Login

only

stores

the

minimum

data

required

to

verify

someone's

identity

and

ensures

that

it

is

being

shared

by

the

rightful

holder.

The

GOV.UK

Wallet

follows

a

decentralised

data

model.

This

means

that

instead

of

storing

everyone’s

personal

data

in

a

new

central

database,

each

government

department

or

agency

manages

its

own

part

of

the

system.

They

issue

and

maintain

digital

credentials

(and

hold

the

personal

data

necessary

to

do

so),

using

their

own

secure

infrastructure,

but

all

these

credentials

can

be

linked

and

used

through

the

GOV.UK

Wallet,

underpinned

by

GOV.UK

One

Login.

Building on these services, we will design the digital ID system to be secure, with only
the

minimum

amount

of

data

collected

and

stored.

The

majority

of

data

used

throughout

the

process

remaining

at

source,

where

it

is

already

securely

stored.

This

will

ensure

the

relationships

that

people

already

have

with

different

government

departments

remain

intact.

For

instance,

data

about

someone’s

benefits

entitlement

will

remain

with

the

Department

for

Work

and

Pensions

(DWP),

even

if

they

prove

their

identity

to

the

DWP

using

the

national

digital

ID.

Box 5.1.1. HM Passport Office protection of personal data
The protection of personal data is paramount to HM Passport Office and is an example
of

how

government

holds

personal

data

safely

and

securely.

HM

Passport

Office

uses

a

multi-layered

security

approach,

combining

encrypted

data

stores

with

strict

access

controls

for

both

users

of

the

data

and

those

maintaining

the

systems.

Our digital services run on modern, UK-hosted cloud infrastructure. We run the system
in

a

securely

protected,

self-contained

environment

designed

to

reduce

risks.

Data

is

encrypted

in

transit

and

at

rest,

only

authorised

people

can

access

the

system,

all

activity

is

recorded,

and

every

request

is

checked

to

ensure

it's

safe

and

legitimate.

Security is designed in from the outset. Threat-modelling is carried out as services are
developed

and

maintained,

ensuring

potential

risks

are

understood

and

mitigated

early.

This

is

supported

by

continuous

monitoring

and

regular

assurance

activities

to

maintain

the

highest

standards

of

security.

HM

Passport

Office

processes

personal

data

in

compliance

with

UK

data

protection

legislation.

Personal

data

is

only

kept

for

as

long

as

necessary,

and

is

not

shared

unless

it

is

lawful,

necessary

and

proportionate

to

do

so.

Full

details

can

be

found

in

the

Privacy

Information

Notice

on

GOV.UK

on

how

your

personal

data

is

used

in

HM

Passport

Office.

Exercising greater consent and control While people will always have a meaningful choice about whether to use the digital ID,
we

are

also

committed

to

exploring

design

options

that

will

support

them

to

exercise

66

greater consent and control while using their digital ID. As set out in Chapter 1.2, the
range

of

ways

people

can

choose

to

use

digital

ID

in

the

public

and

private

sector

will

grow

over

time

but,

crucially,

people

will

also

be

able

to

continue

using

any

other

alternatives,

like

physical

documents.

However,

for

those

who

opt

to

use

their

digital

ID,

our

ambition

is

to

build

in

greater

consent

and

control

than

physical

alternatives

offer.

For instance, in Chapter 3.1 we cover how the digital ID will support 'selective
disclosure'

functionality.

Currently,

when

presenting

or

using

scans

of

physical

identity

documents,

individuals

have

no

choice

but

to

disclose

all

of

the

information

printed

on

them.

This

can

often

include

unnecessary

attributes

or

information.

By

contrast,

the

digital

ID

will

allow

people

to

disclose

only

information

about

themselves

that

is

relevant

to

a

situation.

This

helps

reduce

privacy

risks

by

minimising

the

potential

for

exposure

of

sensitive

data.

By

allowing

people

to

control

when,

where

and

with

whom

to

share

information

from

their

device,

this

also

makes

someone’s

consent

central

to

any

interactions

where

they

choose

to

present

their

digital

ID.

We want to maximise these kinds of benefits for people. As this system develops, we
will

therefore

continue

considering

how

people

can

be

empowered

to

exercise

greater

consent

and

control

over

their

digital

ID

in

other

ways

and

in

different

use

cases.

For clarity, references in this section to consent are not intended to be read as
references

to

consent

as

defined

under

the

UK

GDPR.

Privacy by design and default We recognise that privacy is a central concern for many individuals and organisations.
We

take

these

concerns

seriously.

The

digital

ID

system

will

be

clear

about

what

data

is

collected,

why

it

is

needed

and

how

it

will

be

used.

We

welcome

an

open

dialogue

with

privacy

focussed

individuals,

organisations

and

communities

to

share

their

views

and

concerns

about

data

protection

and

privacy

of

the

system.

We

will

work

closely

with

stakeholders

to

help

ensure

that

privacy

concerns

are

heard

and,

where

appropriate,

addressed.

We expect that the digital ID system will offer a range of privacy benefits to users and to
society,

including:
● allowing people to share only the information necessary for a given transaction or
to

access

a

service

(e.g.

proving

age

over

18

without

revealing

a

full

date

of

birth

or

other

information

which

might

be

seen

on

a

physical

document)

● reducing reliance on less secure means of proving identity (e.g. reduced need to
share

or

use

hardcopy

identity

documents

and

other

evidence)
● ensuring greater transparency of how data is processed and who it is
shared with
● simplifying businesses’ privacy compliance responsibilities by introducing a
simple

and

secure

way

to

check

an

individual’s

right

to

work
67

While detailed arrangements for personal data processing are subject to the final design
of

the

system

and

cannot

be

set

out

in

detail

at

this

time,

the

following

safeguards

will

be

built

into

the

digital

ID

system

to

protect

user

privacy

and

give

people

full

confidence

in

how

their

information

will

be

handled:

● Data protection by design and by default. The system will be designed with
privacy

as

a

core

principle,

following

“privacy

by

design

and

default”

from

the

earliest

stages.

Every

architectural

and

functional

decision

will

prioritise

user

privacy,

including

minimising

data

collection,

ensuring

secure

storage,

and

maintaining

transparency.

Privacy

specialists

will

be

embedded

within

the

project

team

to

review

all

design

choices

and

provide

guidance

to

ensure

compliance

with

data

protection

laws.

Decisions

will

be

documented

and

auditable,

reinforcing

accountability

throughout

the

process.

As

part

of

the

UK’s

data

protection

framework,

the

accountability

principle

means

that

an

organisation

is

responsible

for

complying

with

the

data

protection

principles

and

must

be

able

to

demonstrate

that

compliance.

● Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). DPIAs will be central to this
approach

and

conducted

continuously

throughout

the

system’s

lifecycle.

These

assessments

will

examine

how

personal

data

is

processed,

identify

risks

to

individuals’

rights,

and

outline

measures

to

mitigate

those

risks.

DPIAs

will

undergo

rigorous

governance,

involve

oversight

from

senior

officers,

and

be

shared

with

the

Information

Commissioner’s

Office

(ICO)

for

review

and

advice.

This

ensures

evolving

risks

are

addressed

promptly

and

compliance

with

data

protection

law

is

maintained.

● Transparency and public engagement . Transparency is central to building public
trust,

and

we

are

committed

to

being

open

and

accountable

in

how

personal

data

is

processed.

The

consultation

process

and

ongoing

engagement

will

give

people

a

say

in

how

the

system

is

designed.

Once

these

decisions

are

finalised,

users

will

receive

clear,

plain-language

information

about

what

data

is

collected,

how

it

is

used,

retention

periods,

and

their

rights.

Privacy

notices

will

be

accessible

and

easy

to

understand,

ensuring

people

remain

informed

and

confident

in

the

system.

● Compliance with all data protection principles and requirements. The digital ID
system

will

comply

with

all

applicable

data

protection

requirements,

including:

o Personal data will be processed fairly, lawfully, and transparently , with
clear

legal

bases

and

safeguards

embedded

to

prevent

harm

or

discrimination.
o Data will be collected only for specific, legitimate purposes , such as
verifying

identity

or

right

to

work,

and

only

the

minimum

necessary

information

will

be

used,

regularly

reviewed,

and

protected

through

technical

controls.
o Accuracy will be maintained via authoritative sources and user-friendly
update

mechanisms.

68

o Data will be retained only as long as needed , stored securely on users’
devices

where

possible.
o Children’s data will be handled with heightened protections, aligning with the
ICO’s

Age

Appropriate

Design

Code

and

Children

and

the

GDPR

guidance.
Questions about Chapter 5.1: Data protection and privacy This question is for members of the public: 5.1.Q1. Are there any additional measures, beyond the principles and standards set out
in

the

consultation,

that

we

should

consider

to

further

protect

user

data?
a. Yes b. No c. Don’t know i. 5.1.Q1.1. If yes, please explain which measures we should consider and
why
This question is for experts responding in their own capacity and for organisations: 5.1.Q2. Principles of data minimisation and empowering users to ensure they have
greater

control

over

how

much

data

they

share

when

using

their

national

digital

ID

at

point

of

use

will

be

central

to

the

design

and

implementation

of

the

digital

ID system.

How

should

the

government

ensure

transparency

around

how

national

digital

ID

data

is

used?

69

Chapter 5.2: Securing the national digital ID system
Building on existing cyber security best practice and processes The government has longstanding experience and best practice in securely protecting
public

systems

and

services

that

handle

large

personal

data

sets,

and

which

are

critical

to

day-to-day

life

in

the

UK.

This

includes

data

that

proves

an

individual’s

identity.

For

example,

HM

Passport

Office

upholds

rigorous

security

principles

to

ensure

the

integrity

and

trustworthiness

of

British

passports,

including

biometric

security

and

strict

identity

verification

protocols.

The

digital

ID

system

will

build

on

the

insights

gained

from

existing

trusted

and

secure

models

and

will

need

to

set

the

benchmark

for

a

secure,

national-scale

digital

identity

service.

It is essential that security of the systems and any data that is accessed, shared and
stored

is

at

the

heart

of

the

design.

The

government

has

identified

cyber

threats

as

a

growing

risk

to

the

resilience

of

public

services,

with

a

sharp

rise

in

sophisticated

attacks

targeting

critical

systems.

Maintaining

the

highest

standards

of

security

and

continuous

improvement

to

ensure

systems

keep

pace

with

evolving

threats

is

essential

to

maintaining

public

trust

and

ensuring

the

long-term

security

of

the

national

digital

ID

infrastructure.

All UK government digital services and technical infrastructure must comply with two
core

standards

Cyber

Assessment

Framework

profiles

and

Secure

by

Design

principles.

The

digital

ID

system

will

be

underpinned

by

these

fundamental

cyber

security

standards,

as

well

as

continuous

advice

on

keeping

pace

with

the

cyber

threat

to

the

UK.

We

will

seek

advice

from

the

National

Cyber

Security

Centre

(NCSC)

as

the

UK's

national

technical

authority

for

cyber

security.

Vulnerable and at-risk individuals It is particularly important that the government takes steps to ensure that government
services

correctly

handle

the

personal

data

of

those

individuals

who

may

be

vulnerable

or

at

heightened

risk

of

harm,

such

as

those

individuals

who

may

experience

disproportionate

harm

if

their

personal

data

is

misused,

exposed,

or

inadequately

protected.

This

includes

but

is

not

limited

to:

● victims of domestic abuse ● people in witness protection schemes ● government staff in sensitive roles ● high-profile public figures ● serving judges or MPs ● children or elderly individuals ● people with disabilities or mental health conditions
70

The digital ID system will operate in line with the government’s published principles for securing personal data in relation to vulnerable and at-risk individuals. This will ensure it
achieves

the

required

balanced,

inclusive

approach

and

protects

such

individuals

without

inadvertently

increasing

their

exposure

through

exclusion

or

inconsistent

treatment

of

their

identifying

information.

National security
The government is required to ensure the digital ID system is secure and protected in
the

interests

of

national

security.

While

detailed

arrangements

for

security

mitigations

are

subject

to

the

final

design

of

the

system

and

cannot

be

set

out

in

detail

at

this

time,

the

digital

ID

system

will

be

built

to

safeguard

against

national

security

threats.

Lawful access
Access to personal data processed as part of the digital ID system will be subject to
existing

legal

requirements

and

restrictions

ensuring

access

is

both

necessary

and

proportionate.

In

particular,

access

to

personal

data

by

law

enforcement

and

intelligence

agencies

for

the

purpose

of

preventing

or

detecting

crime,

or

in

the

interests

of

national

security

is

governed

by

existing

legislation,

including

the

Police

and

Criminal

Evidence

Act

1984,

Crime

and

Courts

Act

2013,

Investigatory

Powers

Act

2016

and

Data

Protection

Act

2018.

Existing

powers

are

designed

to

enable

the

detection

and

prevention

of

serious

threats,

such

as

terrorism,

espionage,

and

serious

crime.

Rigorous

oversight

and

safeguards

are

in

place

to

protect

the

rights

and

privacy

of

individuals.

Access to the new digital ID more broadly will also be governed by existing laws
(including

the

UK

GDPR

and

the

Data

Protection

Act

2018).

This

is

already

the

case

for

DVLA

and

the

driving

licence,

HM

Passport

Office

and

the

passport,

and

GOV.UK

One

Login.

Police powers There will be no legal obligation for people to have or present the digital ID. The police
will

not

have

new

powers

to

request

an

individual’s

digital

ID

for

stop

and

search

purposes.

71

Box 5.2.1 – Police stop and search
In the UK there is no legal requirement to carry proof of identity at all times, and this will
remain

the

case.

The

police,

with

several

limited

exceptions,

generally

have

no

powers

to

require

a

person

to

provide

them

with

identity

documents

during

day-to-day

encounters.

However, where immigration enforcement officers are carrying out an enforcement visit
or

warrant,

they

do

have

powers

to

ensure

that

all

those

who

are

employed

have

the

right

to

work

in

the

UK

which

may

include

examining

identity

documents.

The police have common law powers to prevent and detect crime, and must comply
with

various

legislation

such

as

data

protection,

human

rights,

equality

and

other

relevant

laws.

For

example,

there

is

a

legal

basis

for

police

use

of

facial

recognition,

which

may

include

access

to

biometric

data

held

by

government.

The

government

recognises

that

the

current

legal

framework

is

complicated

and

has

launched

a

consultation

(which

concluded

in

February

2026)

on

reviewing

the

legal

framework

for

using

facial

recognition

in

law

enforcement.

That

consultation

proposes

a

new

legal

framework

that

will

create

consistent,

durable

rules

and

appropriate

safeguards

for

facial

recognition

and

similar

technologies

which

are

likely

to

follow

it

in

relation

to

biometric

data

held

by

government

in

the

future
.

The

national

digital

ID

will

be

subject

to

existing

frameworks

and/or

to

any

new

legal

framework

introduced.

72

Questions about Chapter 5.2: Securing the national digital ID system
This question is for everyone:
5.2.Q1. Are there any additional security safeguards to those named above that should
be

considered

in

relation

to

the national digital

ID system?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
i. 5.2.Q1.1. What are they and why are you recommending them?

73

Chapter 5.3: Fraud as a national challenge
Fraud against individuals and businesses is a rapidly evolving and deeply harmful crime
which

devastates

victims,

erodes

public

trust,

and

poses

a

serious

threat

to

the

national

security

and

economic

stability

of

the

UK.

The

government

knows

that

fraud

is

a
significant problem in both the public and private sectors in the UK, with research from the Office for National Statistics estimating fraud to be the most prevalent crime type in England and Wales. We know that fraudsters will target the digital ID system – and that
ensuring

we

understand

why,

how

and

when

will

be

critical

to

maintaining

trust

and
keeping the system safe for use. This work will be implemented alongside the government’s expanded Fraud Strategy, which was published by the Home Office on 9 March 2026.
A significant proportion of fraud in the UK is enabled by identity misuse and
unauthorised

account

access.

This

occurs

where

criminals

impersonate

others,

steal,
buy or create false identities to access services, benefits, or financial products. In 2024, Fraudscape reported that identity fraud represented 59% of all cases filed to the Cifas National Fraud Database. Artificial intelligence (AI) has also altered the fraud landscape, introducing new and complex risks. AI can be used by malicious actors to
generate

highly

convincing

fake

identities,

manipulate

biometric

data,

and

automate

impersonation

at

scale.

Tackling identity misuse is therefore critical to ensuring a secure digital identity system.
The

digital

ID

system

offers

opportunities

to

strengthen

verification

and

authentication

processes,

making

it

harder

for

criminals

to

exploit

identity-related

weaknesses.

Identity

abuse

can

also

occur

when

credentials

appear

dormant,

outdated

or

the

digital

ID

is

no

longer

valid

or

required,

creating

opportunities

for

exploitation.

This

means

it

will

be

important

to

maintain

identity

accuracy

throughout

the

lifecycle

of

the

digital

ID.

74

Box 5.3.1 - Scammers
The national digital ID will be targeted by fraudsters, scammers and misinformation
campaigns.

Fraudsters

may

impersonate

government

agencies,

sending

fake

emails,

scam

texts

or

calls

asking

people

to

“register”

or

“verify”

their

digital

ID.

These

messages

could

link

to

malicious

websites

designed

to

steal

personal

data

or

payment

information.

Criminals

might

also

promote

unofficial

apps

claiming

to

be

the

new

digital

ID

or

GOV.UK

Wallet

tricking

users

into

downloading

malware

or

submitting

sensitive

data.

Criminals

could

pose

as

employers

or

government

officials

requesting

the

new

digital

ID’s

details

for

right

to

work

checks,

then

use

that

data

for

identity

theft

or

fraud.

Similarly,

unregulated

third-party

services

may

offer

to

“help”

users

set

up

their

digital

ID,

collecting

personal

information

under

false

pretences.

To ensure the success and integrity of the digital ID system, we know it is essential to
anticipate

and

mitigate

the

risks

posed

by

scams

and

misinformation.
As outlined in Part 4, some groups may require alternative routes and additional support
to

access

and

use

the

digital

ID.

These

alternative

routes

will

be

designed

without

compromising

security

and

with

robust

fraud

prevention

measures

built

in.

75

Questions about Chapter 5.3: Fraud as a national challenge
These questions are for everyone:
To make sure everyone can access and use the national digital ID, the application
process

will

need

to

offer

alternative

routes

and

additional

support

for

those

who

need

them.

5.3.Q1. We want to ensure these alternative access routes are secure. What do you
think are

the most

important factors we

need

to consider in

order to

achieve

this?

5.3.Q2. What do you think are the most important factors to consider
when ensuring alternative

access

routes to

the

national

digital

ID are

not misused

by

fraudulent

actors?

76

Chapter 5.4: Ensuring strong oversight and governance
Strong governance and oversight are vital to protecting individuals’ rights and
establishing

public

trust

in

the

national

digital

ID

system.

Robust

oversight

regimes

often

involve

a

combination

of

internal

and

external

processes,

ranging

from

internal

complaints

handling

mechanisms

right

up

to

independent

scrutiny

and

being

held

to

account

by

Parliament

and

others.

Existing oversight structures As set out in chapter 2.1, the government has a mature and trusted infrastructure for
identifying

good

digital

verification

services,

which

helps

ensure

people’s

data

and

privacy

are

protected.

This

includes

existing

standards

and

regulatory

safeguards

for

areas

including

cyber

security,

national

security,

fraud,

and

data

protection

and

privacy.

We

intend

for

the

digital

ID

system

to

operate

within

this

ecosystem,

adopting

these

standards

and

safeguards,

to

ensure

the

system

operates

to

the

highest

standards.

There is a key role for Parliament in scrutinising the proposals for the digital ID system,
its

ongoing

operation

and,

where

required,

any

secondary

legislation

that

is

necessary.

On

an

ongoing

basis,

government

departments

are

required

to

annually

report

to

Parliament

on

their

financial

performance

and

activities,

and

it

is

our

expectation

that

the

digital

ID

system

will

be

subject

to

these

same

requirements.

It

is

also

our

intention

to

put

in

place

bespoke

reporting

arrangements

that

will

reflect

any

statutory

powers

and

duties

agreed

by

Parliament

in

respect

to

the

system.

Any

legislation

will

also

be

subject

to

post

implementation

review

to

allow

Parliament

to

understand

how

it

is

operating.

Additional oversight arrangements We will examine the full range of oversight options that may be applicable to the system
once

the

final

design

is

in

place,

though

this

work

will

begin

with

public

input

throughout

the

consultation

process.

Appropriate

oversight

will

meet

the

needs

of

the

digital

ID

system,

and

will:

● hold the government to account for risk management and necessary controls ● be proportionate to the burdens or restrictions imposed on the public and
business

● be efficient and economical ● be suitably open and transparent, making information accessible Of specific importance will be how people can seek resolution if they encounter issues.
For

example,

an

error

with

the

issuance,

renewal

or

revocation

of

their

digital

ID,

or

a

technology

failure

that

could

lead

to

a

negative

impact

on

the

user.

It

is

essential

that

there

are

clear

routes

for

individuals

to

make

a

complaint

and

that

the

process

to
77

manage these complaints is quick and effective. The government will consider
appropriate

forms

of

redress

(the

process

by

which

an

issue

is

made

right)

and

whether

and

how

individuals

can

seek

compensation,

through

a

claim,

where

they

may

be

eligible

to

do

so.

For some existing government functions, users are provided with the ability to escalate
issues

to

an

independent

party

for

resolution

if

they

are

not

satisfied

with

earlier

attempts

to

resolve

their

issue.

We

could

consider

a

similar

procedure

for

the

digital

ID

system.

For

example,

HM

Passport

Office

has

a

procedure

for

complaints

about

handling

passport

applications

that

includes

four

steps,

two

of

which

are

fully

independent

from

HM

Passport

Office.

Box

5.4.1

summarises

the

HM

Passport

Office

complaints

procedure.

Box 5.4.1: Summary of HM Passport Office complaints procedure
HM Passport Office sets out the following 4 step process for managing complaints:
Step 1: If you have a complaint about how we handled your passport application,
contact

our

customer

contact

centre

by

phone,

in

writing

or

by

using

our

online

enquiry

form.

Step 2If you have followed step 1 and are not satisfied with our response, you can ask
us

to

review

your

complaint.

Step 3If you have followed steps 1 and 2 and are still not satisfied, you can escalate your complaint to the Independent Examiner of Complaints (IEC) within 3 months of receiving our response.
Step 4: If you are still not satisfied, you can ask your MP to request an investigation by
the

Parliamentary

and

Health

Service

Ombudsman

(the

Ombudsman).

You

can

only

do

this

through

your

MP.

The

Ombudsman’s

role

is

to

investigate

complaints

by

members

of

the

public

about

the

way

government

departments,

and

their

executive

agencies,

have

treated

them.

The government will also consider support for victims of fraudulent use of their digital
ID.

Victims

of

identity

theft

often

face

significant

harm,

including

reputational

damage,
exclusion from services and emotional distress. Home Office research finds victims of fraud can suffer significant emotional and health impacts, even if they have not
experienced

a

large

financial

loss.

Current support mechanisms in the UK focus primarily on identity fraud, with practical
advice

available

from

organisations

such

as

Action

Fraud,

Cifas,

and

credit

reference

agencies.

Legal

remedies

and

formal

victim

support

structures

for

identity

theft

remain

limited,

particularly

where

stolen

documents

have

not

yet

been

used

to

commit

a

further

offence.

The

government

intends

to

consider

how

victims

of

digital

ID

misuse

will

be

78

supported, including access to credential revocation, and protection against
re-victimisation.

Provisions

should

also

be

made

to

allow

individuals

affected

by

misuse

or

errors

to

restore

their

digital

ID

quickly

and

securely

without

creating

new

vulnerabilities,

to

ensure

they

can

access

services

and

benefits

to

which

they

are

rightly

entitled.

Strengthening

these

mechanisms

builds

public

trust

and

helps

ensure

that

the

system

is

resilient

to

abuse.

79

Questions about Chapter 5.4: Ensuring strong oversight and
governance

These questions are for experts responding in their own capacity and organisations:
5.4.Q1. What additional oversight mechanisms, if any, should be put in place for the
national

digital

ID system?

5.4.Q2. What measures can you suggest, if any, that could be put in place to make sure
people can

resolve

issues

with

their

national

digital

ID?

These questions are for members of the public5.4.Q3. What additional oversight mechanisms, if any, would help you to have trust in
the

national

digital

ID system?

5.4.Q4. What measures do you think should be in place to help you feel confident in
resolving

any

issues

with

your

national

digital

ID?

80