Employment Rights Act 2025 — Will write letters: Letter from Baroness Jones to Baroness Noakes regarding statutory sick pay analysis in the regulatory impact assessment.
Parliament bill publication: Will write letters. Unassigned.
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State
Department for Business and Trade
Old Admiralty Building
Admiralty Place
Whitehall
London
SW1A 2DY
The Baroness Noakes DBE
House of Lords
London
SW1A 0PW
T: +44 (0) 020 4551 0011
E: baronessjones.correspondence@businessandtrade.gov.uk
W: www.gov.uk/dbt
19 June 2025
Dear Baroness Noakes,
Employment Rights Bill – Statutory Sick Pay Analysis
Following our committee stage debate on the Employment Rights Bill on 13 May, I committed to
write to you to answer your question as to how the per employee cost of Statutory Sick Pay (SSP),
set out in our Regulatory Impact Assessment, was calculated.
Employers are not required to provide the Government with data on when an employee takes sick
leave, the duration of that absence, or whether they receive SSP. We therefore estimate the annual
cost of SSP to businesses using an internal Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) model based
on information from the Family Resources Survey (FRS) 2022/23 and DWP Employee Survey 2023.
This data is used to calculate the probability that an employee will be eligible and likely to receive
SSP or Occupational Sick Pay and estimates the probability of each employee taking a sickness
absence.
Using this model, the Government estimates that the current cost of SSP is £ 650 million per year,
rising to £1.07 billion when you factor in the proposed changes in the Bill, a difference of £420 million.
This cost is then averaged across all employees (28.5 million) estimated by the FRS to provide an
averaged ‘per employee’ cost , rather than just those who take sick leave . We use this averaged
figure as the model only estimates a probability of an employee going off sick.
This results in an average cost of £23 per employee for the current system, £38 for the new proposed
system, and, therefore, a difference of £15 per employee. The actual employee cost for an employer
will depend on the business size and the frequency/ duration of sickness absences within their
business.
I am copying this letter to all Noble Lords who spoke in the debate and to the Minister for Employment
and Minister for Lords in DWP. I am also depositing a copy of this letter in the Library of the House.
Best wishes,
BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Legislation)
Department for Business and Trade