Public Office (Accountability) Bill — Second Reading — Hansard, 3 November 2025
The Prime Minister opened the Second Reading debate, calling Hillsborough 'an injustice' and 'a cover-up by the institutions that are supposed to protect and serve'.
Public Office (Accountability) Bill - Hansard - UK Parliament
UK Parliament
Hansard
Commons3 November 2025
Commons Chamber
Public Office (Accountability) Bill
Public Office (Accountability) Bill
Volume 774debated on Monday 3 November 2025
Nov
3
2025
Download text
Back to top
Previous
debate
Next
debate
Second Reading
5.27 pm
The Prime Minister
(Keir Starmer)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 4 on
Share contribution 4 on
Share contribution 4 via
Copy link to contribution 4 to clipboard
Copy link
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
Before I come to the Bill, I put on record in this House my own tribute to the police, to the first responders and in particular to the heroic actions of the driver and members of staff on board the Doncaster to London train, where such a vile and horrific attack took place this weekend. We all share in the revulsion at this shocking incident, but there is no doubt that their collective action—their brave action—saved countless lives. I know that the whole country is grateful for that.
Thirty-six years ago, 97 men, women and children went to a Liverpool football match in Sheffield—it was an FA cup semi-final, an occasion of joy—and they never came home to their families. I invite the House just to reflect on that simple statement of fact and what that might feel like.
Nearly 15 years ago, when I was the Director of Public Prosecutions, I met many of the Hillsborough families during the independent panel led by Bishop James Jones. I will never forget what they told me in their testimony—painful to tell, painful to hear. It included the testimony of Jenni Hicks, who told me how she and her husband drove their two teenage girls to the game that day. They had to drive back later with an empty back seat. Every single story, every single experience is painful to the core—unimaginable to the core.
So before I come to the contents of the Bill, I want to begin this debate with a simple acknowledgment, long overdue, that the British state failed the families and victims of Hillsborough to an almost inhuman level. But those victims and their families—their strength, their courage, their refusal to give up; and their determination, no matter what was thrown at them, to fight for people they will never know or meet, to make sure that they never go through something like this again—they are the reason why we stand here today with this Bill, they are the reason why it will be known as the Hillsborough law, and they are the reason why we say clearly again what should have been said immediately: that their loved ones were unlawfully killed and that they never bore any responsibility for what happened in Sheffield that day, and we say it from this Dispatch Box today because the entire country knows what happened next.
We often call Hillsborough a tragedy, but it is more than a tragedy, because the disaster was not down to chance—it was not an accident; it was an injustice. And then further injustice was piled on top when the state subjected those families to enduring, from the police, lies and smears against their loved ones, while the central state, the Government, aided and abetted them for years and years and years. It was a cover-up by the very institutions that are supposed to protect and to serve, and it is nothing less than a stain on the modern history of this country.
And yet, can we truly say that Hillsborough was an isolated example? No, because there are also the Horizon scandal, Grenfell Tower, infected blood, the grooming gangs, Windrush, and more besides. We should also be blunt about the fact that there is a pattern common to all these scandals: time and again, the British state
struggles to recognise injustice because of who the victims are—because they are working class, because they are black, because they are women and girls. That is the injustice that this Bill seeks to correct, and I hope that it commands the support of the whole House.
Andy Slaughter
(Hammersmith and Chiswick) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 5 on
Share contribution 5 on
Share contribution 5 via
Copy link to contribution 5 to clipboard
Copy link
Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that a couple of things are missing from this otherwise excellent Bill? The first is an acknowledgment of the role that the media played in covering up many of the wrongs that happened, and the second is a national oversight mechanism which would ensure that when recommendations are made, they are carried out.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 6 on
Share contribution 6 on
Share contribution 6 via
Copy link to contribution 6 to clipboard
Copy link
I am grateful for that intervention. Of course we must acknowledge the role that the media and others played in this—it was a cover-up at so many levels. As for an oversight mechanism, I do not think that the Bill is the place for it, but I do agree with the proposition that when there are inquiries, there needs to be a better way of ensuring that they are followed through.
Jim Allister
(North Antrim) (TUV)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 7 on
Share contribution 7 on
Share contribution 7 via
Copy link to contribution 7 to clipboard
Copy link
The Prime Minister has listed a litany of scandals where there have been cover-ups. Will he reflect on including the Chinook disaster, in respect of which there have been repeated attempts to cover up the truth—the state of the aircraft that was sent out that night, in which we lost so many valued members of our intelligence service? Is that not a wrong that now needs to be righted?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 8 on
Share contribution 8 on
Share contribution 8 via
Copy link to contribution 8 to clipboard
Copy link
I thank the hon. and learned Gentleman for raising that. This Bill is obviously intended to deal with all the situations in which there needs to be a duty of candour, with consequences if that is not adhered to.
Jim Shannon
(Strangford) (DUP)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 9 on
Share contribution 9 on
Share contribution 9 via
Copy link to contribution 9 to clipboard
Copy link
Will the Prime Minister give way?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 10 on
Share contribution 10 on
Share contribution 10 via
Copy link to contribution 10 to clipboard
Copy link
I will make some progress, but I will take further interventions later.
Let me now turn to the Bill itself, and first of all to the duty of candour. There are three parts to this, and the first is a new statutory duty of candour. At the Hillsborough independent panel, Bishop James Jones found that over 100 statements made by junior police officers had been deliberately altered to remove evidence unfavourable to South Yorkshire police—100 statements had been deliberately altered. I do not think there is anyone in this House who could possibly disagree that we must never let anything like that happen again. It is a disgrace, and the Bill before the House will tackle it.
Jim Shannon
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 11 on
Share contribution 11 on
Share contribution 11 via
Copy link to contribution 11 to clipboard
Copy link
I commend the Prime Minister and the Government for bringing this Bill forward. I think it heartens us all to see its contents. Does the Prime Minister not agree that, with the rise of social media, there is more public scrutiny than ever before and less trust in our institutions? As he has outlined, the Bill is an opportunity to begin that journey of restoring public trust, but we must be mindful that nothing less than accountability can be acceptable. The public understand that mistakes can be made, but they cannot and should not forget when cover-ups take place.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 13 on
Share contribution 13 on
Share contribution 13 via
Copy link to contribution 13 to clipboard
Copy link
I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. The Bill includes legal provisions to ensure that this can never happen again as a matter of law, but I have been clear—I have said this to the families on a number of occasions—that it is also the culture that has to change. The Bill is the architecture, but the culture of the state has to change.
Anneliese Midgley
(Knowsley) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 14 on
Share contribution 14 on
Share contribution 14 via
Copy link to contribution 14 to clipboard
Copy link
Charlotte Hennessy, whose father Jimmy Hennessy was unlawfully killed at Hillsborough, has had conversations with the Prime Minister in which he has assured her that the law does not need to be watered down and will be delivered in its entirety. She is in the Chamber today. Will he make that promise in this House today?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 15 on
Share contribution 15 on
Share contribution 15 via
Copy link to contribution 15 to clipboard
Copy link
Absolutely. I looked the families in the eye and made that promise, and I meant it. I say it again from this Dispatch Box: this Bill will not be watered down. This is such an important re-orchestrating of the relationship between the state and its citizens. It will not be watered down. I am very pleased to be able to affirm that from this Dispatch Box.
Ayoub Khan
(Birmingham Perry Barr) (Ind)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 16 on
Share contribution 16 on
Share contribution 16 via
Copy link to contribution 16 to clipboard
Copy link
Will the Prime Minister give way?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 17 on
Share contribution 17 on
Share contribution 17 via
Copy link to contribution 17 to clipboard
Copy link
I will take one more intervention and then I will press on.
Ayoub Khan
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 18 on
Share contribution 18 on
Share contribution 18 via
Copy link to contribution 18 to clipboard
Copy link
I thank the Prime Minister for giving way. Does he agree that one of the most powerful lessons from Hillsborough, and indeed from the Grenfell Tower and Post Office scandals, is that truth delayed is justice denied? And does he agree that, while this Bill rightly places a duty of candour upon public authorities, it must also compel Ministers themselves to uphold that same duty when addressing this House, so that accountability begins at the very top? That includes the misleading information that was given from that Dispatch Box by his Minister last week in relation to the hooligan Maccabi Tel Aviv fans.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 19 on
Share contribution 19 on
Share contribution 19 via
Copy link to contribution 19 to clipboard
Copy link
I really think that, with the Hillsborough families here in the House with us—
Madam Deputy Speaker
(Ms Nusrat Ghani)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 20 on
Share contribution 20 on
Share contribution 20 via
Copy link to contribution 20 to clipboard
Copy link
Order. I was trying to pay close attention, but I may have missed it; we do not accuse each other of giving misleading information at the Dispatch Box. One should be mindful of the language that one is uses.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 21 on
Share contribution 21 on
Share contribution 21 via
Copy link to contribution 21 to clipboard
Copy link
Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I also think that we owe the families a better debate than this descending into party political point scoring. I hope we can continue the debate in that way.
This Bill will tackle that injustice so that when tragedy strikes and the state is called to account, in inquiries, inquests and other investigations, public officials—from police officers to the highest offices in the land—will be subject to that duty. That means that an injustice like this can never again hide in some dark corner of the state. Failure to comply—failure, therefore, to act with candour, transparency and frankness—will now carry criminal penalties, including being sent to prison.
Liz Saville Roberts
(Dwyfor Meirionnydd) (PC)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 23 on
Share contribution 23 on
Share contribution 23 via
Copy link to contribution 23 to clipboard
Copy link
As a sponsor of the private Member’s Bill tabled by the hon. Member for Liverpool West Derby (Ian Byrne), I fully welcome this Bill’s introduction, and I welcome that the protections include criminal offences of misconduct in public life. Can the Prime Minister assure me and others that those new offences will be able to be applied retrospectively?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 24 on
Share contribution 24 on
Share contribution 24 via
Copy link to contribution 24 to clipboard
Copy link
No, they will not be able to, but that is not a deficiency of this Bill; it is a long-standing constitutional rule. This will be about offences moving forward. But I will just make the point—because I do think it is important—that these measures will apply across the United Kingdom, and I would like to place on record my thanks to the devolved Governments for their collaboration on this.
I can also announce that the Government intend to bring forward an amendment to extend this duty to local authority investigations in England, which will make sure that when an inquiry or investigation is set up by a local authority—for example, the Kerslake inquiry into the Manchester Arena bombings—there can also be that duty of co-operation and candour in the search for the truth.
Sir Jeremy Wright
(Kenilworth and Southam) (Con)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 25 on
Share contribution 25 on
Share contribution 25 via
Copy link to contribution 25 to clipboard
Copy link
I recognise the strength of the case that the Prime Minister is making. He will understand the interest that the Intelligence and Security Committee has in clause 6 of the Bill, which provides for certain exemptions for those who work for the intelligence agencies. It then says that those people should report internally within their organisation any information that may be of use to an inquiry or investigation. Will he give some thought to how the Government might develop a concept of what then happens to that information, about which the Bill is broadly silent? He will understand that many will be concerned to ensure that when information is reported internally within the intelligence agencies, it none the less finds its way to those who should have it, in order to give reassurance about what the Government are seeking to achieve more broadly in this Bill.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 26 on
Share contribution 26 on
Share contribution 26 via
Copy link to contribution 26 to clipboard
Copy link
Obviously, a lot of thought has been given to the particular issue of the security and intelligence services. The Bill is clear that the duty applies, but has a different way of applying it. I think that gets the balance right, and obviously there are various national and public interests to protect in so doing.
Andy McDonald
(Middlesbrough and Thornaby East) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 27 on
Share contribution 27 on
Share contribution 27 via
Copy link to contribution 27 to clipboard
Copy link
I congratulate the Prime Minister and thank him for bringing forward this Bill, which represents an epic struggle by the Hillsborough families, who are to be much admired and praised, but this will extend beyond Hillsborough, as the Prime Minister has said. I thank him on behalf of the families of Christie Harnett, Nadia Sharif and Emily Moore, who suffered great loss under the auspices of the Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS foundation trust, which lacked a duty of candour when those terrible tragedies struck. I hope that he can give consideration to a full, judge-led public inquiry, because the families are in search of truth, justice and accountability.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 29 on
Share contribution 29 on
Share contribution 29 via
Copy link to contribution 29 to clipboard
Copy link
To reassure my hon. Friend, the House, the families and all others affected by such scandals, these are clauses in a Bill that will soon be sections in a piece of legislation, but they are more than that: they change the nature of the relationship between the state and its duties to its people. That is so important. Yes, this Bill is the legal architecture, but something much bigger than this has to be put in place.
Tessa Munt
(Wells and Mendip Hills) (LD)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 30 on
Share contribution 30 on
Share contribution 30 via
Copy link to contribution 30 to clipboard
Copy link
rose—
Maria Eagle
(Liverpool Garston) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 31 on
Share contribution 31 on
Share contribution 31 via
Copy link to contribution 31 to clipboard
Copy link
rose—
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 32 on
Share contribution 32 on
Share contribution 32 via
Copy link to contribution 32 to clipboard
Copy link
I will take the hon. Lady’s intervention, then I will come to my right hon. Friend.
Tessa Munt
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 33 on
Share contribution 33 on
Share contribution 33 via
Copy link to contribution 33 to clipboard
Copy link
I welcome this Bill. Will the Prime Minister reassure me and my constituents that organisations that are contractors for public authorities and public bodies will also be covered the provisions of the Bill? It is important that where responsibilities are deferred to other bodies, they too are captured by the clauses in this Bill.
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 34 on
Share contribution 34 on
Share contribution 34 via
Copy link to contribution 34 to clipboard
Copy link
The hon. Lady anticipates my next point, which I will make before taking an intervention from my right hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool Garston (Maria Eagle). We have to recognise that in some scandals, such as the Post Office Horizon scandal, the boundaries between the public sector and the private sector are complicated. In answer to the hon. Lady’s question, clause 4 of this Bill applies the duty to some private bodies, particularly those delivering public functions and those with relevant health and safety responsibilities, as well as relevant public sector contractors—in the Post Office case, Fujitsu—for that very reason. We have to recognise that the boundaries are blurred, and we need to make sure that the duty extends appropriately.
Maria Eagle
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 35 on
Share contribution 35 on
Share contribution 35 via
Copy link to contribution 35 to clipboard
Copy link
The Prime Minister knows that, for over two decades, the legal system failed to provide truth and justice to the Hillsborough families, and it was only a non-legal process—the Hillsborough independent panel—that finally set things right on the road to truth, justice and accountability. Does he see any prospect, therefore, that we will include in the legislation at a later stage provision to ensure that a Hillsborough independent panel-type process can be offered to families involved in future disasters, to try to circumvent the long-standing failure of the criminal justice system to offer truth and accountability to families quickly?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 36 on
Share contribution 36 on
Share contribution 36 via
Copy link to contribution 36 to clipboard
Copy link
I thank my right hon. Friend for her work and campaigning on this issue over many years. She makes a powerful point about the independent panel. I first met Bishop James Jones 15-plus years ago now, and I genuinely think he was among the first to listen properly—knowing what listening means—to those who were giving evidence to his panel, which is why the report that he made was so well received and respected. We will certainly give consideration to whether panels like that can serve a useful purpose in future.
Yasmin Qureshi
(Bolton South and Walkden) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 37 on
Share contribution 37 on
Share contribution 37 via
Copy link to contribution 37 to clipboard
Copy link
The Prime Minister is being very generous in taking all our questions. I congratulate him on introducing this Bill, but can the duty of candour be applied fully to all investigations, including independent panels, and not
just statutory inquiries? Does he agree that the command responsibility must rest personally with those in charge, not simply with the institution?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 38 on
Share contribution 38 on
Share contribution 38 via
Copy link to contribution 38 to clipboard
Copy link
This does apply to non-statutory inquiries, so my hon. Friend’s point is covered in the Bill. I will press on.
The second part of the duty of candour is a professional duty of candour for all public servants, because the Nolan principles of public service—honesty, integrity, accountability, selflessness, objectivity, openness and leadership—are not some kind of optional extra, but the very essence of public service itself. Every public authority will now be legally required to adopt a code of ethical conduct based on those principles, and to set out consequences for staff who do not comply, including disciplinary sanctions up to and including gross misconduct.
Rosie Wrighting
(Kettering) (Lab)
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 39 on
Share contribution 39 on
Share contribution 39 via
Copy link to contribution 39 to clipboard
Copy link
The Bill is a huge step forward for accountability and transparency for families who face what must feel like the most impossible of circumstances. Some families living in my constituency and the neighbouring constituency of Corby are still trying to get clarity about the possibility that dumped toxic waste and contaminated land have caused health complications. Could the Prime Minister spell out how the Bill will ensure that any public official who abuses their power and tries to cover it up will be held accountable?
The Prime Minister
Share
this specific contribution
Share a link to this specific contribution:
Share contribution 40 on
Share contribution 40 on
Share contribution 4